Hello I have now tried to form a log file that contains both happy case (500
recipients) and unhappy one (501 recipients)
To debug the case I created 999 bogus users with username
us...@listserv.kuntaliitto.fi to user...@listserv.kuntaliitto.fi
Because the log file is quite a big one (run with
> myhostname = apac3.apac.org.ni
In DNS: apac3.apac.org.ni = 165.98.119.11
BUT
165.98.119.11 != apac3.apac.org.ni
165.98.119.11 == pppleon11.ibw.com.ni.
Kim Albee:
> What we want is the ability to have users send email from their email -- and
> have that email be represented in the From Email line (which is by default
> envelope-sender), and use SPF record for identifying our server as
> authorized to send emails on behalf of their domain,
For tha
OK -- maybe I'm not asking my question in the right way... it appears that
in every case, the "from" email address field is also the envelope sender --
is there a way to separate that, so what appears in a user's inbox as the
'from email' shows up as the from field, not the envelope sender
automati
Basically this the config im running now !
Greetings !
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Oscar Mauricio Cruz Lazo <
osmcr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> thanks alot
>
> my postconf -n
>
>
> here my config postconf -n
>
> apac3:~ # mailq
> Mail queue is empty
> apac3:~ # postconf -n
> alias_maps =
thanks alot
my postconf -n
here my config postconf -n
apac3:~ # mailq
Mail queue is empty
apac3:~ # postconf -n
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases, hash:/var/lib/mailman/data/aliases
best_mx_transport = local
biff = no
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
daemon_directory
Sylvain Ferrand wrote:
Hello,
I would like to overwrite the "display-name" (i.e. the sender
description string in the the From: field. - cf. RFC 5322 sec 3.4) set
by the MUA. Is it possible to rewrite the "display-name" (1) in the
"From:" header on a postfix server ?
Thanks in advance,
Syl
Oscar Mauricio Cruz Lazo a écrit :
>
> Hi all
>
> I runnig a postfix server but now i notice Emails from my server is
> being blocked by some ISPs because they claim it has a bogus helo,
> I just checked the list and my IP is not listed as a spammer,
it has nothing to do with spammer listing. th
Zoltan Balogh a écrit :
> Hi List,
>
> I have an old postfix install where I am getting "timeout after
> CONNECT from" error messages upon e-mails being send from one
> particular host. The user is complaining that he is not able to send
> out any e-mail. Other users from the same system are sendi
Sjaak Eenhuis a écrit :
>
>> courierctpd: failed to create cache file. error no space left on device. It
>> feds out that my /home is 100% full. ugh.
>> Thanks, I didn't know that mail errors were logged. Obviously...
>
> I made some space. Btw, will old mail still be delivered. Is there a queue
>
>From: Oscar Mauricio Cruz Lazo
>To: postfix users list ;
>amavis-u...@lists.sourceforge.net; postfix-es
>Sent: Thu, February 25, 2010 8:44:33 PM
>Subject: bogus HELO name used
>
>
>Hi all
>
>I runnig a postfix server but now i notice Emails from my server is being
>blocked by some ISPs becau
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, LuKreme wrote:
On 25-Feb-2010, at 05:35, Larry Stone wrote:
example.com. 60 IN MX 10 mail.example.com.
where the 60 is the time-to-live in seconds and the 10 is the priority.
Er, that's not what my MX looks like at all in bind9.
MX
Hi all
I runnig a postfix server but now i notice Emails from my server is being
blocked by some ISPs because they claim it has a bogus helo,
I just checked the list and my IP is not listed as a spammer,
this only happens to certain email addresses, 97% of mail still goes through
fine, just the o
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:18:41AM -0300, Gerardo Herzig wrote:
> Hi all, im reading the docs about setting postifx with multiples
> instances [1]. At the "Setting up the null-client Postfix instance"
> part, there is a sample main.cf "which will be a local-submission null
> client:" file, with th
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:08:03 +1100
Adrian Overbury wrote:
> I think that there's an important step here that I always use when I'm
> doing a mail migration. It could really go anywhere above the 'wait for
> a Friday night' step, really. "Reduce the TTL on the domain to
> something quite smal
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 02:07:40PM -0600, Kim Albee wrote:
> Is there a filter or a mod that can be made to Postfix that would have the
> process that handles bounced emails within Postfix send the email to a
> different email address (i.e. email identified in specific header variable)
> rather th
Is there a filter or a mod that can be made to Postfix that would have the
process that handles bounced emails within Postfix send the email to a
different email address (i.e. email identified in specific header variable)
rather than the envelope-sender?
thanks,
Kim
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 01:42:27PM -0500, zhong ming wu wrote:
> > Postfix does not implement the "external" SASL mechanism for
> > authenticating users via TLS client certs.
>
> So it sends user/password to dovecot socket and get yes/no answer?
Postfix copies SASL protocol requests between the
On 25-Feb-2010, at 05:35, Larry Stone wrote:
>
> example.com. 60 IN MX 10 mail.example.com.
>
> where the 60 is the time-to-live in seconds and the 10 is the priority.
Er, that's not what my MX looks like at all in bind9.
MX 10 mail.example.com.
all the
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:48 AM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> Postfix does not implement the "external" SASL mechanism for
> authenticating users via TLS client certs.
So it sends user/password to dovecot socket and get yes/no answer?
>
> TLS is hop-by-hop, not end to end. With TLS the client auth
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 02:45:32PM +0200, Niemi Hannu wrote:
> I have been fighting with a problem with Postfix. There are some users that
> insist on sending mail to large groups of recipients (yes I know that mailman
> or similar is made for that) and there is a limit of number of recipients,
On 2/25/2010 11:34 AM, Carlos Williams wrote:
> I am getting ready to step up my Postfix version from
> postfix-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2 (Package maintainers version) to Simon's
> binary RPM 2.7.0 package. Currently I checked out the 'Release Notes":
>
> http://de.postfix.org/ftpmirror/official/postfix-2.7.
I am getting ready to step up my Postfix version from
postfix-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2 (Package maintainers version) to Simon's
binary RPM 2.7.0 package. Currently I checked out the 'Release Notes":
http://de.postfix.org/ftpmirror/official/postfix-2.7.0.RELEASE_NOTES
>From what I read, no functionalist ha
Yeah, it SHOULD be. Now, the question is, why it cuts on 500 recipients... I
made this 1002 setting to be sure the default (which SHOULD be 1000) was for
some reason off. But it didn't change anything.
And yes, I remembered to reload :)
hannu
>
>Lähettäj
Hi List,
I have an old postfix install where I am getting "timeout after
CONNECT from" error messages upon e-mails being send from one
particular host. The user is complaining that he is not able to send
out any e-mail. Other users from the same system are sending mail
happily without errors. User
Hi all, im reading the docs about setting postifx with multiples
instances [1]. At the "Setting up the null-client Postfix instance"
part, there is a sample main.cf "which will be a local-submission null
client:" file, with this:
.
.
# Send everything to the internal mailhub
#
relayhost = [mailhub.
> courierctpd: failed to create cache file. error no space left on device. It
> feds out that my /home is 100% full. ugh.
> Thanks, I didn't know that mail errors were logged. Obviously...
I made some space. Btw, will old mail still be delivered. Is there a queue I
need to flush?
Niemi Hannu wrote:
Hello
I have been fighting with a problem with Postfix. There are some users that
insist on sending mail to large groups of recipients (yes I know that mailman
or similar is made for that) and there is a limit of number of recipients,
which I have after extensive testing
>
> Exception e skrev:
>> Recently I did some updates and a reboot for my debian etch server. Now it
>> feds out that one mail account doesn't recieve mail anymore. I suspect there
>> is a relation.
>>
>> If I send a mail to a mail-only user on this server I see that it appears in
>> its folder.
>
Hello
I have been fighting with a problem with Postfix. There are some users that
insist on sending mail to large groups of recipients (yes I know that mailman
or similar is made for that) and there is a limit of number of recipients,
which I have after extensive testing managed to pinpoint to
On 2/25/10 2:35 AM, Bas Mevissen at ab...@basmevissen.nl wrote:
> Your domain has at least one MX record for receiving mail.
> Suppose it is:
>
> mydomain MX 10 1 day oldserver_ip
>
> Change it to
>
> mydomain MX 20 1 min oldserver_ip
> mydomain MX 10 1 min newserver_ip
MX records point t
Recently I did some updates and a reboot for my debian etch server. Now it
feds out that one mail account doesn't recieve mail anymore. I suspect there
is a relation.
If I send a mail to a mail-only user on this server I see that it appears in
its folder.
/var/spool/mailusers//Maildir
When I se
thanks for your answers
I finally modify the smtp_host_lookup option as the following :
smtp_host_lookup = dns,native
then hosts resolution works right again
Erwan David a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 09:21:05AM CET, Patrick Ben Koetter
said:
* Frank Bonnet :
Hello
I get this error
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 16:51 -0800, Terry Barnum wrote:
> When it's time to swap servers, is there a preferred recipe to move to new
> hardware while using the same domain? I googled and checked the FAQ and
> archives but didn't have a whole lot of luck.
>
Your domain has at least one MX record
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 09:21:05AM CET, Patrick Ben Koetter
said:
> * Frank Bonnet :
> > Hello
> >
> > I get this error since few hours :
> >
> > (Host or domain name not found. Name service error for
> > name=bart.esiee.fr type=A: Host not found, try again)
> >
> > the machine bart.esiee.fr h
* Frank Bonnet :
> Hello
>
> I get this error since few hours :
>
> (Host or domain name not found. Name service error for
> name=bart.esiee.fr type=A: Host not found, try again)
>
> the machine bart.esiee.fr has a FQDN and is
> on my LAN , any idea of what happen ?
Are /etc/hosts and /var/spo
forgotten to pay the domain registration fee?
suomi
On 02/25/2010 09:11 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
I get this error since few hours :
(Host or domain name not found. Name service error for
name=bart.esiee.fr type=A: Host not found, try again)
the machine bart.esiee.fr has a FQDN and is
on
Hello
I get this error since few hours :
(Host or domain name not found. Name service error for
name=bart.esiee.fr type=A: Host not found, try again)
the machine bart.esiee.fr has a FQDN and is
on my LAN , any idea of what happen ?
mail# nslookup bart
Server: 147.215.1.4
Address:
38 matches
Mail list logo
