On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Jeff Lacki wrote:
>
> > Im not nearly as versed in postfix as I would like to
> > be. Ive tried to figure this log message out but Im not
> > sure whats really going on:
> >
> > Jul 13 23:36:08 mysvr postfix/smtpd[14133]: NOQUEUE:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Jeff Lacki wrote:
> Im not nearly as versed in postfix as I would like to
> be. Ive tried to figure this log message out but Im not
> sure whats really going on:
>
> Jul 13 23:36:08 mysvr postfix/smtpd[14133]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> mms.nextel.com[170.206.225.68]: 45
Im not nearly as versed in postfix as I would like to
be. Ive tried to figure this log message out but Im not
sure whats really going on:
Jul 13 23:36:08 mysvr postfix/smtpd[14133]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
mms.nextel.com[170.206.225.68]: 450 4.7.1 :
Helo command rejected: Host not found; f
Andrew Thompson wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
This is not an effective anti-spam control if that's what you're
trying to use it for. You'll probably have better results with a
fairly low smtpd_hard_error_limit and working recipient validation
(clients are disconnected after $smtpd_hard_error_limit
Noel Jones wrote:
This is not an effective anti-spam control if that's what you're
trying to use it for. You'll probably have better results with a
fairly low smtpd_hard_error_limit and working recipient validation
(clients are disconnected after $smtpd_hard_error_limit bad recipients).
I'd
Jaime Kikpole wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Victor
Duchovni wrote:
Don't use a CNAME in a mail address.
Why not? After all, how would you handle vhosts if you can't send as
the CNAME record?
Sendmail often rewrites these. Postfix typically leaves CNAME domains
alone. The OP shoul
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Victor
Duchovni wrote:
>> Don't use a CNAME in a mail address.
Why not? After all, how would you handle vhosts if you can't send as
the CNAME record?
> Sendmail often rewrites these. Postfix typically leaves CNAME domains
> alone. The OP should avoid these, but
Martijn de Munnik wrote:
Hi,
On Jul 13, 2009, at 7:57 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
Martijn de Munnik wrote:
smtpd_recipient_limit = 25
only if you have 25 or fewer users.
I thought this means a user can send an e-mail to 25 users max at once?
After $smtpd_recipient_limit + 1 RCPT TO command
Helga Mayer:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm testing postscreen on our secondary smtp server.
> First results:
> https://rz-static.uni-hohenheim.de/hmayer/tmp/Screenshot-68.png
> There are hardly anymore rejects. I did not yet adjust mailgraph for the
> drops.
That is an interesting picture. It looks like drop
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Sun, July 12, 2009 22:47, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> > On Sun, 12 Jul 2009, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> >
> >> >> Anyway if it is a name server timeout, then I think this is always
> >> >> handled by a 450 response. In my case the mail was rejected.
> >>
Hi,
On Jul 13, 2009, at 7:57 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
Martijn de Munnik wrote:
smtpd_recipient_limit = 25
only if you have 25 or fewer users.
I thought this means a user can send an e-mail to 25 users max at once?
On Jul 13, 2009, at 11:12 PM, Martijn de Munnik wrote:
On Jul 13, 2009, at 10:59 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
Martijn de Munnik wrote:
Hi Noel, List,
Thanks for your reply! I changed things according to your settings
but I guess I overlooked a thing? Still they backup mailserver
relays everyth
Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
Jul 14 00:11:58 rap postfix/smtpd[1054]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from rap.rap.dk[127.0.0.1]: 450 4.1.8
: Sender address rejected: Domain not found;
from= to= proto=ESMTP helo=
Jul 14 00:11:58 rap postfix/smtpd[1054]: > rap.rap.dk[127.0.0.1]: 450
4.1.8 : Sender address r
Keld J?rn Simonsen:
> Is there a way to disambiguate between DNS timeouts and DNS errors,
> and discard the latter?
Postfix is only the messenger of the bad news. When the server
responds, Postfix acts accordingly. When the server does not
reply, Postfix assumes that this is a temporary error, bec
Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 06:19:40PM -0400, Rod Dorman wrote:
On Monday, July 13, 2009, 17:49:10, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
...
Are there distros that are known to have a postfix package that is set
up correctly wrt chroot?
OpenBSD
Well, I confin
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 06:19:40PM -0400, Rod Dorman wrote:
> On Monday, July 13, 2009, 17:49:10, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> > ...
> > Are there distros that are known to have a postfix package that is set
> > up correctly wrt chroot?
>
> OpenBSD
Well, I confine myself to Linux, as I am doing
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:49:10PM +0200, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 03:39:57PM +0200, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> > >
> > > It is chrooted.
> >
> > Thanks for spelling it out. I was just building on the defalt configuration
> > of my distro. There were many other chroot
On Monday, July 13, 2009, 17:49:10, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> ...
> Are there distros that are known to have a postfix package that is set
> up correctly wrt chroot?
OpenBSD
--
r...@polylogics.com "The avalanche has already started, it is too
Rod Dorman late for the pebbles
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 03:39:57PM +0200, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 09:26:44AM -0400, John Peach wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:24:04 +0200
> > Keld J__rn Simonsen wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> > > #
> > >
On Jul 13, 2009, at 10:59 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
Martijn de Munnik wrote:
Hi Noel, List,
Thanks for your reply! I changed things according to your settings
but I guess I overlooked a thing? Still they backup mailserver
relays everything for *...@validdomain.org. Invalid domains are not
re
Martijn de Munnik wrote:
Hi Noel, List,
Thanks for your reply! I changed things according to your settings but I
guess I overlooked a thing? Still they backup mailserver relays
everything for *...@validdomain.org. Invalid domains are not relayed.
Please don't top-post.
Valid recipients fo
Hi Noel, List,
Thanks for your reply! I changed things according to your settings but
I guess I overlooked a thing? Still they backup mailserver relays
everything for *...@validdomain.org. Invalid domains are not relayed.
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
con
On 12-Jul-2009, at 16:32, LuKreme wrote:
On Jul 12, 2009, at 8:41 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
Sounds like a MySQL (not Postfix) issue; debug there. Are there
any other
type of mysql error lines in the log?
Nope, and the errors are rare. OTOH, I use MySQL almost exclusively
for postfix.
Wel
Ok, so, in other words: that's a solution but not the better solution.
Now, i can ALSO use thge sendmail wrapper. I need to have a look at
postfwd code to see if and where i can increment mail counters.
In this way, i will use postfwd for mail coming from CGI scripts and
Remote SMTP, and the wrap
On Jul 13, 2009, at 12:10, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:00:33PM -0400, Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote:
Jul 13 11:53:06 hostname postfix/local[6159]: 0650B3059C: to=>,
relay=local, delay=0.13, delays=0.11/0/0/0.03, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent
(delivered to command: /usr/bin/procmail)
I'm trying to implement an email-to-fax gateway using Postfix +
Hylafax. Hylafax's provide faxmail command does function - but it
doesn't accomplish what I want. In particular, I would like to:
1. Send an e-mail with one or more attachments intended for faxing.
The attachments will already
Martijn de Munnik wrote:
Hi List,
A script just screwed my main.cf of a backup mx. Unfortunately I don't
have a backup of the main.cf. I restored the main.cf but one thing is
still not working as before. The relay*_for_stevie files contain the
domains and emailaddresses which accept mail on stev
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:34:00PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> Jaime Kikpole wrote:
>> I just migrated most users from one server to another one. However, a
>> few things still need to work on the first server. One of them is a
>> web-based program named Request Tracker (RT).
>> When RT sends an
Jaime Kikpole wrote:
I just migrated most users from one server to another one. However, a
few things still need to work on the first server. One of them is a
web-based program named Request Tracker (RT).
When RT sends an email to me, it is coming from
r...@atlas.cairodurham.org. I am trying
Hi List,
A script just screwed my main.cf of a backup mx. Unfortunately I don't
have a backup of the main.cf. I restored the main.cf but one thing is
still not working as before. The relay*_for_stevie files contain the
domains and emailaddresses which accept mail on stevie.youngguns.nl.
When I tes
I just migrated most users from one server to another one. However, a
few things still need to work on the first server. One of them is a
web-based program named Request Tracker (RT).
When RT sends an email to me, it is coming from
r...@atlas.cairodurham.org. I am trying to make that say
r...@c
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:00:33PM -0400, Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote:
> Jul 13 11:53:06 hostname postfix/local[6159]: 0650B3059C: to=,
> relay=local, delay=0.13, delays=0.11/0/0/0.03, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent
> (delivered to command: /usr/bin/procmail)
This looks good. What is in headers of the mes
On Jul 13, 2009, at 11:46, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:24:09AM -0400, Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote:
I must be doing something wrong here, because it isn't working as I
expect.
Here's what I see happening:
- email to non-groupwise-...@bar.edu (on a server running sendmail)
On Jul 13, 2009, at 11:51 AM, "ad...@gg-lab.net"
wrote:
Hi,
i don't think my situation keeps changing-
That's simple: on my evinronment users can send email via CGI + PHP +
SMTP (sasl), and i want to limit them "globally".
Example: user giorgio can send 100 emails. I want him locked also
Hi,
i don't think my situation keeps changing-
That's simple: on my evinronment users can send email via CGI + PHP +
SMTP (sasl), and i want to limit them "globally".
Example: user giorgio can send 100 emails. I want him locked also on
CGI, if he send 100 emails with PHP.
I can't:
- use a cus
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:24:09AM -0400, Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote:
> I must be doing something wrong here, because it isn't working as I expect.
> Here's what I see happening:
> - email to non-groupwise-...@bar.edu (on a server running sendmail) shows
> up on my system as being to both non-gro
Begin forwarded message:
On Jul 13, 2009, at 10:42, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:34:00AM -0400, Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote:
main.cf:
# Pick one:
#canonical_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/canonical
#virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/valias
#virt
On Jul 13, 2009, at 10:42, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:34:00AM -0400, Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote:
main.cf:
# Pick one:
#canonical_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/canonical
#virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/valias
#virtual_alias_domains = ... s
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:34:00AM -0400, Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote:
>>main.cf:
>> # Pick one:
>> #canonical_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/canonical
>> #virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/valias
>> #virtual_alias_domains = ... set me explicitly ...
>> #
>> #canonica
On Jul 13, 2009, at 10:06, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 11:01:01PM -0400, Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote:
Greetings, all.
I'm having trouble with a forwarded email setup, and I need to
munge an
inbound recipient address.
Here's what I have set up: f...@bar.edu is forwarded to o.
Keld Jørn Simonsen a écrit :
> iA problem I have again with the DNS (lack of query)
>
>
> I have in my mail queue:
>
> C074C641AF 2236 Sun Jul 12 15:40:56 k...@rap.rap.dk
> (host spike.porcupine.org[168.100.189.2] said: 450 4.1.7 :
> Sender address rejected: unverified address: host
> rap.
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 11:01:01PM -0400, Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote:
> Greetings, all.
>
> I'm having trouble with a forwarded email setup, and I need to munge an
> inbound recipient address.
>
> Here's what I have set up: f...@bar.edu is forwarded to o...@rab.net.
>
> bar.edu is running GroupWise
> # ==
> # service type private unpriv chroot wakeup maxproc command + args
> # (yes) (yes) (yes) (never) (100)
> # ==
> smtpin
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 09:26:44AM -0400, John Peach wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:24:04 +0200
> Keld J__rn Simonsen wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > #
> > ==
> > # service type private unpriv chroot wakeup maxproc command +
> > a
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 08:29:28AM -0400, John Peach wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:25:01 +0200
> Keld J__rn Simonsen wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 07:07:01AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> > > On 7/13/2009, Keld J__rn Simonsen (k...@dkuug.dk) wrote:
> > > > I am getting it via f
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:24:04 +0200
Keld J__rn Simonsen wrote:
[snip]
> #
> ==
> # service type private unpriv chroot wakeup maxproc command +
> args # (yes) (yes) (yes) (never) (100) #
> ==
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 08:28:16AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Keld Jørn Simonsen:
> [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 07:18:03AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > Keld J?rn Simonsen:
> > > > 450 indicates a temporary dns error, and I have set
> > > > u
On Jul 13, 2009, at 5:54 AM, "ad...@gg-lab.net"
wrote:
Lucian, i saw that solution, but i want something that can globally
limit EVERY mail sent:
i'll also offer smtp access, and a sendmail wrapper isn't a solution.
Benny: ok, so we are speaking about the evenlope sender, so, it seems
this
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:25:01 +0200
Keld J__rn Simonsen wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 07:07:01AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> > On 7/13/2009, Keld J__rn Simonsen (k...@dkuug.dk) wrote:
> > > I am getting it via fetchmail
> >
> >
> >
> > If you are getting it through fetchmail, then the
Keld J?rn Simonsen:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 07:18:03AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Keld J?rn Simonsen:
> > > 450 indicates a temporary dns error, and I have set
> > > unknown_address_reject_code = 550
> >
> > unknown_address_reject_code is fo
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 07:07:01AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 7/13/2009, Keld Jørn Simonsen (k...@dkuug.dk) wrote:
> > I am getting it via fetchmail
>
>
>
> If you are getting it through fetchmail, then the message has already
> been delivered... so you MUST NOT reject it later, *especial
Wietse Venema:
[ Charset UNKNOWN-8BIT unsupported, converting... ]
> Keld J_rn Simonsen:
> > 450 indicates a temporary dns error, and I have set
> > unknown_address_reject_code = 550
>
> unknown_address_reject_code is for permanent errors.
>
> In your case, the system library getnameinfo() return
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 07:18:03AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Keld Jørn Simonsen:
> > 450 indicates a temporary dns error, and I have set
> > unknown_address_reject_code = 550
>
> unknown_address_reject_code is for permanent errors.
>
> In your case, the system library getnameinfo() returns a
On Jul 13, 2009, at 4:51, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Mon, July 13, 2009 05:01, Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote:
I'm having trouble with a forwarded email setup, and I need to munge
an inbound recipient address.
stop forwarding mails so, simple no ?
Simple, yes, but it does not address my issue. As I
Here some details on cpanel limits:
http://forums.cpanel.net/email-exim/73464-how-does-new-max-emails-per-hour-tracking-work-2.html
2009/7/13 ad...@gg-lab.net :
> Lucian, i saw that solution, but i want something that can globally
> limit EVERY mail sent:
>
> i'll also offer smtp access, and a se
Keld J?rn Simonsen:
> 450 indicates a temporary dns error, and I have set
> unknown_address_reject_code = 550
unknown_address_reject_code is for permanent errors.
In your case, the system library getnameinfo() returns a
temporary error, therefore Postfix will reply with 450.
Since you also can't
On 7/13/2009, Keld Jørn Simonsen (k...@dkuug.dk) wrote:
> I am getting it via fetchmail
If you are getting it through fetchmail, then the message has already
been delivered... so you MUST NOT reject it later, *especially* if it is
spam - unless of course you really *want* to end up blacklisted..
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:10:18AM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> On Mon, July 13, 2009 10:30, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I have a few problems with my changed postfix configuration, maybe
> > somebody could help me?
> >
> > I am using fetchmail in cooperation with postfix, and I r
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:36:21AM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> On Mon, July 13, 2009 11:21, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> > iA problem I have again with the DNS (lack of query)
> >
> >
> > I have in my mail queue:
> >
> > C074C641AF 2236 Sun Jul 12 15:40:56 k...@rap.rap.dk
> > (host spike.
Lucian, i saw that solution, but i want something that can globally
limit EVERY mail sent:
i'll also offer smtp access, and a sendmail wrapper isn't a solution.
Benny: ok, so we are speaking about the evenlope sender, so, it seems
this is the solution.
2009/7/13 Benny Pedersen :
>
> On Mon, July
On Mon, July 13, 2009 11:21, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> iA problem I have again with the DNS (lack of query)
>
>
> I have in my mail queue:
>
> C074C641AF 2236 Sun Jul 12 15:40:56 k...@rap.rap.dk
> (host spike.porcupine.org[168.100.189.2] said: 450 4.1.7 :
> Sender address rejected: unverif
On Mon, July 13, 2009 09:51, ad...@gg-lab.net wrote:
> i want to limit mail sent via php mainly, so i can't limit via sasl
> simply because users aren't authenticated.
remove 127.0.0.1 in mynetworks, and make sasl usage from all what got sent from
this box, problem solved, next step is a policy
iA problem I have again with the DNS (lack of query)
I have in my mail queue:
C074C641AF 2236 Sun Jul 12 15:40:56 k...@rap.rap.dk
(host spike.porcupine.org[168.100.189.2] said: 450 4.1.7 :
Sender address rejected: unverified address: host
rap.rap.dk[85.81.22.91] said: 450 4.7.1 Client host
On Mon, July 13, 2009 10:30, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a few problems with my changed postfix configuration, maybe
> somebody could help me?
>
> I am using fetchmail in cooperation with postfix, and I repededly get
> the following error:
>
> fetchmail: SMTP error: 450 4.1.8 : Sende
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 7:01 PM, ad...@gg-lab.net wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i have benn googling for hours today, and can't solve this problem:
>
> I'm working on a free-hosting platform. As MTA, of course, i've
> choosen postfix. Now, to prevent abuse, i want to limit the number of
> email each user can se
On Mon, July 13, 2009 05:01, Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote:
> I'm having trouble with a forwarded email setup, and I need to munge
> an inbound recipient address.
stop forwarding mails so, simple no ?
--
xpoint
Hi
I have a few problems with my changed postfix configuration, maybe
somebody could help me?
I am using fetchmail in cooperation with postfix, and I repededly get
the following error:
fetchmail: SMTP error: 450 4.1.8 : Sender
address rejected: Domain not found
reading message k...@sia.dkuug.dk:
Benny,
i want to limit mail sent via php mainly, so i can't limit via sasl
simply because users aren't authenticated.
Of course i can't limit the host ip (all mail sent from my webserver).
The most beautiful thing would be limiting system user (each user has
an entry in /etc/passwd). Limiting th
On Sun, July 12, 2009 22:47, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jul 2009, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
>
>> >> Anyway if it is a name server timeout, then I think this is always
>> >> handled by a 450 response. In my case the mail was rejected.
>> >
>> > Yes, temporary errors always get a 450 response.
69 matches
Mail list logo
