On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:00:33PM -0400, Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote:
> Jul 13 11:53:06 hostname postfix/local[6159]: 0650B3059C: to=<o...@rab.net>,
> relay=local, delay=0.13, delays=0.11/0/0/0.03, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent
> (delivered to command: /usr/bin/procmail)
This looks good. What is in headers of the message in question? Did
any "o...@rab.net" addresses fail to be mapped to "f...@bar.edu"?
> Also, I hope you won't mind if I send unedited logs to you privately, with
> the request that the logs themselves not be forwarded to the list.
The logs don't need to be "unedited", just make clear and consistent
substitutions for any addresses you do not wish to disclose.
Ditto for the primary message headers, which should be posted here also,
with the same substitutions.
> One other thing I should note is that my virtual map (virtual_maps, not to
> be confused with virtual_alias_maps) is no longer working.
The "virtual_maps" feature is obsolete, it was long ago replaced with
virtual_alias_maps, and a backwards-compatible default was assigned:
virtual_alias_maps = $virtual_maps
> I run virtual
> domains on my server and have many addresses forwarded offsite; those
> forwards no longer work.
Add all your previous tables to virtual_alias_maps, stop using
"virtual_maps".
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majord...@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
