I run Debian etch and i use smtp.gmail.com as postfix relayhost.
I also have a list of senders from different domains allowed to relay
smtp traffic on my server .
While for local senders in $myorigin i want my postfix to relay smtp
with gmail , for users in the list i want my local postfix to not
r
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 7:30 PM, Robert Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your "less technical" users are right, it takes less time to look in a
> spam folder than it is to open a browser window and navigate to the
> web interface. I would have found it irritating in a very short time
> and some
Hi group
I'm writing to you as my only hope. I'm very dissapointed because I'm
black listed due to a misconfiguration that I haven't found where.
This is the problem. From a time, I've been watching my logs and this
is what I see:
Jul 14 23:48:21 server postfix/qmgr[11448]: A9044104A29: from=<>,
Hi group
I'm writing to you as my only hope. I'm very dissapointed because I'm
black listed due to a misconfiguration that I haven't found where.
This is the problem. From a time, I've been watching my logs and this
is what I see:
Jul 14 23:48:21 server postfix/qmgr[11448]: A9044104A29: from=<>,
Danny Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Im having some problem sending mail, i can receive mails but not send.
>
> The system is FreeBSD 6.3, im trying to make a mail server with virtual
> domains, and from ports i have installed the following:
>
> postfix-2.4.7,1
> courier-authli
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Sahil Tandon wrote:
Sender Address Verification (SAV) is done in Postfix with the
reject_unverified_sender parameter; see postconf(5) for details. Before
employing this feature, make sure you understand its implications and read
the ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.
Sahil,
On 7/29/08, Ville Walveranta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Robert Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Can't they add "X-Spam: yes"? For a paid service they're offering you
>> remarkably little options.
>
> I'm requesting that change as it would positively identif
Rich Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Charles Marcus wrote:
[...]
>> Are you doing SAV (Sender Address Verification)? You should NOT use SAV
>> for general mail reception, you should only do SAV probes for sending
>> domains you control and/or have gotten explicit perm
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Robert Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can't they add "X-Spam: yes"? For a paid service they're offering you
> remarkably little options.
I'm requesting that change as it would positively identify the spam
messages. They generally seem to buffer the spam on th
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 3:08 PM, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you're removing the blank line. always be careful with "last".
No, the first pass was just to collect information (i.e. whether the
"**SPAM**" exists on the Subject line). It didn't remove the blank
line in the end of the header.
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Charles Marcus wrote:
Post output of postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases, hash:/etc/postfix/major-aliases
body_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/body_checks
command_directory = /usr/sbin/
config_directory = /etc/postfix
daemon_d
On 7/26/08, Ville Walveranta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<...>
> The external service tags the spam Subject
> lines with **SPAM**, and currently there is no option to change that
> to a header tag on their side. I would like to do that locally so that
> the Subjects of all of the spam messages in th
Hello.
Im having some problem sending mail, i can receive mails but not send.
The system is FreeBSD 6.3, im trying to make a mail server with virtual
domains, and from ports i have installed the following:
postfix-2.4.7,1
courier-authlib-base-0.61.0
courier-authlib-mysql-0.61.0
courier-imap-4.3.
On 7/28/2008 5:03 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:
Postfix is rejecting mail from an address that should be allowed in. The
mail log tells me:
Jul 28 13:11:58 salmo postfix/smtpd[17243]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
wsip-xx-xxx-xx-xx.ph.ph.cox.net[xx.xxx.xx.xxx]: 450 4.1.7
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Sender addre
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Rich Shepard wrote:
Postfix is rejecting mail from an address that should be allowed in. The
mail log tells me:
More information.
proto=ESMTP helo=
I should have written this as 'somedomain.com'.
When I try to traceroute to the sending address I get as far as
On Sunday, 27 July 2008 17:29:41 +0200,
mouss wrote:
Hi mouss.
>> I am trying to configure my home Postfix so that the outgoing mail to
>> an external email from a user of my LAN are rewritten to a valid
>> account of mail, which would be to me especially useful if I would
>> want to send some ty
Postfix is rejecting mail from an address that should be allowed in. The
mail log tells me:
Jul 28 13:11:58 salmo postfix/smtpd[17243]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
wsip-xx-xxx-xx-xx.ph.ph.cox.net[xx.xxx.xx.xxx]: 450 4.1.7
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Sender address rejected: unverified
address: Address
Ville Walveranta wrote:
Here's the completed code that includes the "blank line check" -- the
body is neither scanned for "Subject: **SPAM**" (saves time and
prevents false positives) nor is the substitution string run against
the body (so that any occurrences of "Subject: **SPAM**" are not
touch
Carlos Williams wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:59 PM, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I fail to find this in the archives ;-p
and you're where? and you'd pay what?
I am in Orlando, FL. Price depends on the length of training. I guess
I would like to leave that open to see what that is wo
Here's the completed code that includes the "blank line check" -- the
body is neither scanned for "Subject: **SPAM**" (saves time and
prevents false positives) nor is the substitution string run against
the body (so that any occurrences of "Subject: **SPAM**" are not
touched in the body).
If someo
2008/7/28 mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Juan Miscaro wrote:
>>
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> I have STARTTLS, SMTP-AUTH, and SASL running with cleartext passwords
>> in a SQL backend for a while now. I am trying to switch over from
>> cleartext to crypt in terms of my passwords stored in MySQL. I have
>>
* Juan Miscaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I have STARTTLS, SMTP-AUTH, and SASL running with cleartext passwords
> in a SQL backend for a while now. I am trying to switch over from
> cleartext to crypt in terms of my passwords stored in MySQL. I have
> things running for IMAP with c
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Daniel L. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmmm...I always wanted to see Florida
To be clear, I am fully capable of installing a vanilla Postfix server
up and getting it to send and receive email. I am looking for someone
who has extensive Postfix understand
Furs wrote:
Hi everybody.
I'm trying to find a solution with postfix that permits
a whitelist and blacklist per domain.
whitelist/blacklist what? a client IP? a client domain? a helo? a sender
? ... etc.
Every domain has to have its own list.
no. but a single list should do.
I found
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:59 PM, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and you're where? and you'd pay what?
I am in Orlando, FL. Price depends on the length of training. I guess
I would like to leave that open to see what that is worth.
Ideally we would pay to have a consultant come down to Orlando
Juan Miscaro wrote:
Hi everybody,
I have STARTTLS, SMTP-AUTH, and SASL running with cleartext passwords
in a SQL backend for a while now. I am trying to switch over from
cleartext to crypt in terms of my passwords stored in MySQL. I have
things running for IMAP with crypt. For SMTP-AUTH I am
Hi everybody,
I have STARTTLS, SMTP-AUTH, and SASL running with cleartext passwords
in a SQL backend for a while now. I am trying to switch over from
cleartext to crypt in terms of my passwords stored in MySQL. I have
things running for IMAP with crypt. For SMTP-AUTH I am using the same
SQL tab
Does anyone know if there is a recommended U.S. school / training
camp that offers a Postfix support? I checked the Postfix website and
there appears to be some but they're international.
My company has training funds & the only thing I would really like to
have a better understanding of is Postf
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E9r=F4me_Oufella?=:
> I have a question regarding the queue handling methods in Postfix.
>
> Is there a way to guarantee that messages that come in through the
> smtpd(8) server, will be delivered to local mailboxes in the exact
> same order by the local(8) delivery agent ?
There
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:51:20AM -0400, J?r?me Oufella wrote:
> I have a question regarding the queue handling methods in Postfix.
>
> Is there a way to guarantee that messages that come in through the
> smtpd(8) server, will be delivered to local mailboxes in the exact
> same order by the loca
Furs wrote:
Hi everybody.
I'm trying to find a solution with postfix that permits
a whitelist and blacklist per domain.
Every domain has to have its own list.
I found header checks it's a possible solution.
but, there is another one? Can I use "sender/recipient" access
where I can put with "r
I have a question regarding the queue handling methods in Postfix.
Is there a way to guarantee that messages that come in through the
smtpd(8) server, will be delivered to local mailboxes in the exact
same order by the local(8) delivery agent ? Under normal, but also
non-normal times, heavy incomi
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 09:32:34PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What log message should I look for when a message has been deferred
> and Postfix has decided it is undeliverable? (I'm parsing the log and
> need to know how to distinguish this from an actual bounce.) Will the
> log conta
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> What log message should I look for when a message has been deferred
> and Postfix has decided it is undeliverable? (I'm parsing the log and
> need to know how to distinguish this from an actual bounce.) Will the
> log contain a 5xx message for that mail?
Look at the "sta
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > - Understand that Postfix refuses [EMAIL PROTECTED]:port as an email
> > destination.
> >
> > Wietse
> >
>
> Ok Wietse, thanks for the info... Do you know if there's any GPL mail
> server accepting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:port as an email destination?
That would be a sec
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:52:52AM +0200, Furs wrote:
>
> Hi everybody.
>
> I'm trying to find a solution with postfix that permits
> a whitelist and blacklist per domain.
You may want to use restriction classes[1] or, more sophisticated,
a policy server. You can write your own policy server[2]
As discussed in "Header check and script" thread, I modified the
yammer sub in Client.pm (yes, I'm sure it's not very pretty; my Perl
skills are very rusty.. but it seems to work). It doesn't yet check
for the end of the header (i.e. for a blank line) to prevent
replacement in the body as well, but
Hi everybody.
I'm trying to find a solution with postfix that permits
a whitelist and blacklist per domain.
Every domain has to have its own list.
I found header checks it's a possible solution.
but, there is another one? Can I use "sender/recipient" access
where I can put with "regexp" or "pc
> - Understand that Postfix refuses [EMAIL PROTECTED]:port as an email
> destination.
>
> Wietse
>
Ok Wietse, thanks for the info... Do you know if there's any GPL mail
server accepting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:port as an email destination?
Thanks
Antonio
kbajwa wrote:
CentOS 5.2
Postfix-2.3.3
Dovecot-1.1.1
Dovecot.Sieve-1.1.5
I have setup with:
home_mailbox = Maildir/ (/etc/postfix/main.cf) &
mail-location = maildir:~/Maildir (/etc/dovecot.conf)
I have created a 'test' user to test Sieve 'Vacation' setup. My questions
are:
1. Which folder
Jeff Weinberger wrote:
I don't know if this is possible in a virtual alias (or even virtual)
set up, but I would like to be able to set up a user name with a
wildcard domain. Here's what I mean:
I host several domains. I would like the address
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' to go to the same place (me).
Jeff Weinberger wrote:
Hi:
I"m using content filtering by using the following (this is the example)
syntax in master.cf:
smtp inet ...other stuff here, do not change... smtpd
-o content_filter=myfilter:myfilter
myfilter unix - n n - 10 pipe
42 matches
Mail list logo
