synfig 1.0-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-10-18
It is affected by these RC bugs:
797994: synfig: ABI transition needed for libstdc++ v5
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
htt
synfigstudio 1.0-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-10-18
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
797994: synfig: ABI transition needed for libstdc++ v5
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lis
Package: openni
Version: 1.5.4.0-13
Severity: important
In raspbian we run checks on built debs for armv7 tagged binary
packages. Your package was detected by these checks and on further
investigation. it seems that the following flags for all arm builds
(whether Debian armel, Debian armhf or
On 09/11/2015 10:38 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>>>
>>> There are also ardour4 entry in desktop file ... are they correct?
>>>
>>
>> dunno, they look fine to me;
>> do you have anything specific in mind.
>
> I just was not sure if binary now build is really ardour4 or just ardour
>
>
ah i see.
wh
Am Freitag, den 11.09.2015, 21:14 +0200 schrieb Jaromír Mikeš:
> ifneq (,$(findstring :$(DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU):,:amd64:))
> CXXFLAGS+=-msse -msse2 -mfpmath=sse
> endif
Please don't second-guess the compiler, it will choose "the right flags" [tm]
on amd64.
- Fabian
signature.asc
Description: This
2015-09-11 21:48 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig :
> On 09/11/2015 09:14 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>>
>> What about renaming man pages from ardour4.1 to ardour.1 ? also entry
>> in ardour.manpages file
>> Same for ardour4.xpm -> ardour.xpm and entry in menu file
>
> but is there any harm in having them
On 09/11/2015 09:14 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>
> What about renaming man pages from ardour4.1 to ardour.1 ? also entry
> in ardour.manpages file
> Same for ardour4.xpm -> ardour.xpm and entry in menu file
but is there any harm in having them called "ardour4"?
>
> Now when we will have just one
2015-09-11 16:42 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig :
> On 09/11/2015 04:24 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>>>
>>> anyhow, if creating a debugging package is as simple as adding
>>> DEB_DH_STRIP_ARGS := --dbg-package=ardour-dbg
>>> to the rules, there's no reason not to do it...
>>
>> That would be great! Th
FYI: The status of the pd-iemnet source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.1-3
Current version: 0.2.1-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
Hi Felipe,
2015-09-11 17:57 GMT+02:00 Felipe Sateler :
> On 11 September 2015 at 12:24, Debian FTP Masters
> wrote:
>> binary:libkodiplatform-dev is NEW.
>> binary:libkodiplatform16 is NEW.
>> source:kodiplatform is NEW.
>
> I just realized this has debian-multimedia@ as Maintainer. This should
>
On 11 September 2015 at 12:24, Debian FTP Masters
wrote:
> binary:libkodiplatform-dev is NEW.
> binary:libkodiplatform16 is NEW.
> source:kodiplatform is NEW.
I just realized this has debian-multimedia@ as Maintainer. This should
be changed to pkg-multimedia-maintainers@.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sa
2015-09-11 16:42 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig :
> On 09/11/2015 04:24 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>>>
>>> anyhow, if creating a debugging package is as simple as adding
>>> DEB_DH_STRIP_ARGS := --dbg-package=ardour-dbg
>>> to the rules, there's no reason not to do it...
>>
>> That would be great! Th
Package: vlc
Version: 2.2.1-3
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
since I installed the big gcc5-transition and all the package updates coming
along with it,
VLC is no longer working properly: When I open a movie, only the top-left part
of the window
actually shows movie content. The rest of t
On 09/11/2015 04:24 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>>
>> anyhow, if creating a debugging package is as simple as adding
>> DEB_DH_STRIP_ARGS := --dbg-package=ardour-dbg
>> to the rules, there's no reason not to do it...
>
> That would be great! Thank you IOhannes!
>
well, done and pushed.
btw, feel
Now to the list :(
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jaromír Mikeš
Date: 2015-09-11 16:24 GMT+02:00
Subject: Re: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing
To: IOhannes m zmölnig
2015-09-11 15:26 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig :
> On 09/11/2015 03:57 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>>> the new
On 09/11/2015 03:57 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>> the new "ardour" package will be exactly a single "ardour" binary
>> package (no more -dbg, -i686 and -altivec packages) - should we add
>> "Provides" for those who need that?
>
> No sure about -i686 and -altivec
i created transitional packages, as
Am Donnerstag, den 10.09.2015, 23:46 +0200 schrieb IOhannes m zmölnig:
> the new "ardour" package will be exactly a single "ardour" binary
> package (no more -dbg, -i686 and -altivec packages) - should we add
> "Provides" for those who need that?
Cleanest solution would be to provide transitional
17 matches
Mail list logo
