On 09/11/2015 03:57 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >> the new "ardour" package will be exactly a single "ardour" binary >> package (no more -dbg, -i686 and -altivec packages) - should we add >> "Provides" for those who need that? > > No sure about -i686 and -altivec
i created transitional packages, as fabian suggested. > But -dbg debugging package we should have. so why hasn't there been an ardour3-dbg_4.2~dfsg-1 package? anyhow, if creating a debugging package is as simple as adding DEB_DH_STRIP_ARGS := --dbg-package=ardour-dbg to the rules, there's no reason not to do it... fgmadsr IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
