On 09/11/2015 10:38 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >>> >>> There are also ardour4 entry in desktop file ... are they correct? >>> >> >> dunno, they look fine to me; >> do you have anything specific in mind. > > I just was not sure if binary now build is really ardour4 or just ardour > >
ah i see. what i did was: - used the "ardour3" repo to export the orig.tgz for the 4.* releases - imported ardour_4.0~dfsg1.orig into the "ardour" repo - rewound the "ardour3" repo to the commit right-after merging in upstream/4.0~dfsg1 - copied the entire debian/ folder over to the "ardour" repo. - replayed the follow-up git commits from the "ardour3" repo onto the "ardour" repo. + but manually re-did the various upstream imports (since i'm not very confident in replaying branch merges) in the end, this should give us identical debian/ directories in both the "ardour" repo and the "ardour3" repo (in the "-a4" family of branches), and at the same time preserving most of the git-history of the a4 packaging. (this is only half-true, as the headlines in debian/copyright needed adjusting: the source-package name is "ardour" and the version numbers have an epoch; i accomplished that by tampering with the git-patches) so after this, the 'ardour' repo would (theoretically) build exactly the same binary packages as the 'ardour3' repo: a single "ardour" deb, containing /usr/bin/ardour4 the rest you can see easily in the git history (--since fb0f3ee8) fgmdsar IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
