Now to the list :( ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jaromír Mikeš <mira.mi...@gmail.com> Date: 2015-09-11 16:24 GMT+02:00 Subject: Re: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing To: IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoel...@umlaeute.mur.at>
2015-09-11 15:26 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoel...@umlaeute.mur.at>: > On 09/11/2015 03:57 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >>> the new "ardour" package will be exactly a single "ardour" binary >>> package (no more -dbg, -i686 and -altivec packages) - should we add >>> "Provides" for those who need that? >> >> No sure about -i686 and -altivec > > i created transitional packages, as fabian suggested. > >> But -dbg debugging package we should have. > > so why hasn't there been an ardour3-dbg_4.2~dfsg-1 package? Ehm ... don't know ... there has been dbg package before in ardour package ... We removed it (for some reason which I don't remember ) and intended to reintroduce it again. What didn't happened :( > anyhow, if creating a debugging package is as simple as adding > DEB_DH_STRIP_ARGS := --dbg-package=ardour-dbg > to the rules, there's no reason not to do it... That would be great! Thank you IOhannes! regards mira _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
