Package: bs1770gain
Version: 0.4.3-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
The first build of bs1770gain on the autobuilders showed a common error
on several architectures:
ffsox_csv2avdict.c:261:10: error: comparison is always false due to limited
range of data type [-Werror=type-limits]
if (EOF==
Package: inkscape
Version: 0.91-4
Severity: minor
This package has a Recommends for perlmagick which is a transitional
package that will be removed after jessie+2.
Please update your dependency to libimage-magick-perl.
--
Martin Michlmayr
Linux for HP Helion, Hewlett-Packard
__
2015-06-18 22:55 GMT+02:00 James Cowgill :
Hi James,
> It's not a concurrent compile issue - the failed build was non
> -parallel.
>
> I've run the build on a few of mipsel machines and it built fine every
> time so I don't think it's a bug in gcc.
>
> Also mips64el built it fine (uses almost the
Hi,
On 18.06.2015 18:57, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> 2015-06-09 21:53 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun
> :
>> I have now implemented this and it works fine.
>> It's in the extra branch of the ffmpeg git repository [1].
> I have tested the branch and it works nicely for me.
Thanks for testing it. :)
> Is
On 18.06.2015 18:55, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2015-06-18 00:42:24, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>> The solution is thus to filter out -Bsymbolic-functions from LDFLAGS,
>> as is done in attached patch. I tested it and it fixes this problem.
>
> Thanks, fixed in git using DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_STRIP.
On Thu, 2015-06-18 at 21:29 +0200, Robin Gareus wrote:
> On 06/18/2015 03:43 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> > 2015-06-18 13:26 GMT+02:00 umläute :
> > > isn't that what #788231 is all about?
> > >
> > > anyhow, #788210 is tagged as unreproducible, so it might be worth
> > > digging somemore into the r
On 06/18/2015 03:43 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> 2015-06-18 13:26 GMT+02:00 umläute :
>> On 2015-06-18 10:33, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>>> 2015-06-18 9:09 GMT+02:00 "IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)"
>>> :
On 06/18/2015 02:50 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> 2015-06-09 18:20 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš :
>
binary:python-soundfile is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.
Packages are routinely processed through to the
pysoundfile_0.7.0-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
pysoundfile_0.7.0-2.dsc
pysoundfile_0.7.0-2.debian.tar.xz
python-soundfile_0.7.0-2_all.deb
python3-soundfile_0.7.0-2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debia
Hi Alessio,
2015-06-18 19:25 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia :
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>> While the team has not announced a formal decision the majority of the
>> team supports FFmpeg (which you don't ;-).
>
> I've never denied that: [1]
> However you have to give peopl
2015-06-18 16:58 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)
:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 2015-06-18 15:43, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>>
>>> a very wild and uneducated check reveals that the build is
>>> parallelized (DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=5). could that somehow
>>> be
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> While the team has not announced a formal decision the majority of the
> team supports FFmpeg (which you don't ;-).
I've never denied that: [1]
However you have to give people enough time to ***think***,
***review*** things, and ***speak up*
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 09:58:19 +0200
Source: giada
Binary: giada
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.9.6~dfsg1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
Changed-By: Jaromír Mikeš
D
2015-06-17 21:04 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš :
> Hi all,
>
> giada has been accepted and I need already fix build on arm64:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=giada&arch=arm64&ver=0.9.6~dfsg1-1&stamp=1434558805
>
> Can somebody grant me DM flag?
Thank you Felipe ;)
___
giada_0.9.6~dfsg1-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
giada_0.9.6~dfsg1-2.dsc
giada_0.9.6~dfsg1-2.debian.tar.xz
giada_0.9.6~dfsg1-2_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
___
Hi Dave,
On 06/17/2015 10:08 PM, david avery wrote:
> what is the plan for any updates to the Jessie tree for Audacity now
> that 2.1.0 is out and 2.1.1 is in RC state?
It is normally Benjamin Drung that takes care of the Audacity uploads.
But if he is too busy, I would consider helping out after
Hi All,
2015-06-09 21:53 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun :
> Hi IOhannes,
>
> On 09.06.2015 09:03, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
>> On 2015-06-09 06:35, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
>>> Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2015, 00:26 +0200 schrieb Andreas
>>> Cadhalpun:
So one can just use two directories
Control: tags -1 + pending
On 2015-06-18 00:42:24, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> Package: libx265-59
> Version: 1.7-2
> Tags: patch
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> The 8-bit variant of libx265-59 can dlopen the 10-bit variant,
> so that it can be used by programs linked against the 8-bit library.
> ffmpeg
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #789111 [libx265-59] libx265-59: does not support requested bitDepth 10 due
to -Bsymbolic-functions in Ubuntu
Added tag(s) pending.
--
789111: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=789111
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bu
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 06:53:24 +
Source: bs1770gain
Binary: bs1770gain bs1770gain-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.4.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Team
Changed-By: Pette
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 05:38:33 +
Source: bs1770gain
Binary: bs1770gain bs1770gain-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.4.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Team
Changed-By: Pette
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-06-18 15:43, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>
>> a very wild and uneducated check reveals that the build is
>> parallelized (DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=5). could that somehow
>> be causing the problem?
>
> x42-plugins not having parallel build enable
2015-06-18 13:26 GMT+02:00 umläute :
> On 2015-06-18 10:33, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>> 2015-06-18 9:09 GMT+02:00 "IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)"
>> :
>>> On 06/18/2015 02:50 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
2015-06-09 18:20 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš :
>>
> I asked removal mipsel build
> https://b
On 2015-06-18 10:33, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> 2015-06-18 9:09 GMT+02:00 "IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)"
> :
>> On 06/18/2015 02:50 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>>> 2015-06-09 18:20 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš :
>
I asked removal mipsel build
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=7882
2015-06-18 9:09 GMT+02:00 "IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)"
:
> On 06/18/2015 02:50 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>> 2015-06-09 18:20 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš :
>>> I asked removal mipsel build
>>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788231
>>> Is it fine just like this or other step is ne
On 06/18/2015 02:50 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> 2015-06-09 18:20 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš :
>> 2015-06-09 15:01 GMT+02:00 Felipe Sateler :
>>
>>> Note that you still need to ask for removal on mipsel of the package.
>>> I would instead just ask for removal, and let x42 build again when the
>>> issue
26 matches
Mail list logo
