Dear
I hereby demand for your good relationship which will be based on
mutual understanding and trust that can lead us to a better future,
get back to me if your interested.
Yours Sincerely,
Miss.Angela
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
p
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 21:37:17 +0100
Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> The problem with your tests is that you can only exchange frontend
> *and* library for comparison. Could you try again with different
> fontends for the exact same libfaad2 again, e.g. mplayer, mplayer2,
> vlc, totem, xine?
Hi Fabian
Hi,
I have tried to raise this issue to upstream:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Hi Uoti,
>
> What do you think about this issue? Is this something that, in your
> opinion, smplayer should fix, or can you restore compatibility in
> mplayer2 (which I would think would b
Am Montag, den 25.03.2013, 12:31 + schrieb Julian Hughes:
> Meanwhile the "official" faad binary itself surely would not be
> one of the frontends which doesn't use libfaad properly?
I wouldn't say that the libfaad library nor its official frontend are
flawless. It is just that all patches ad
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 703868 + moreinfo
Bug #703868 [src:libav] libav: Internal error: found 2 (choice -> promotion)
mappings for a single choice.
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
703868: htt
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 09:47:36 +0100
Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> This commit refers to the frontend code and does not touch libfaad
> itself.
>
> I am not that sure anymore. It seems that the library is fine to play
> gapless and that its the frontends that need to get patched in order
> to cop
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:25 AM, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> at bottom :-
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> Besides having libavcodec54 being replaced with libavcodec-extra-54
>> (the latter is binary compatible with the former, but provides more
>> functionality, hence
Hi.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:03 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Having said this, this leaves the libdca package with no supporters at
> all. I would therefore formally orphan the package in the next upload,
> unless supporters object and add themselves to the Uploaders field.
I don't really care
at bottom :-
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Besides having libavcodec54 being replaced with libavcodec-extra-54
> (the latter is binary compatible with the former, but provides more
> functionality, hence the "-extra-"), what exact problems do you
> experience?
that's
Am Montag, den 25.03.2013, 10:24 +0100 schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
> Besides having libavcodec54 being replaced with libavcodec-extra-54
> (the latter is binary compatible with the former, but provides more
> functionality, hence the "-extra-"), what exact problems do you
> experience?
Does anyone h
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 6:55 AM, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> Source: libav
> Version: 6:9.4-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
> I was updating the system today and came across this :-
>
> $ sudo aptitude install libswscale2=6:9.4-1 libswscale-dev=6:9.4-1
> libavutil-dev=6:9.4-1 libavcod
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am Montag, den 25.03.2013, 08:03 +0100 schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
>> Moreover, I've noticed that Fabian has removed himself from Uploaders.
>> That's okay, nobody can be forced to work on package he does not feel
>> like, but I also notice
Am Sonntag, den 24.03.2013, 22:59 + schrieb Julian Hughes:
> The relevant patch seems to be:
> http://www.rockbox.org/tracker/task/12185
> though I'm not knowledgeable enough to determine if this patches
> libfaad itself, rockbox's own code, or both. Anyway I hope it is
> useful.
This commit
Am Montag, den 25.03.2013, 08:03 +0100 schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
> Moreover, I've noticed that Fabian has removed himself from Uploaders.
> That's okay, nobody can be forced to work on package he does not feel
> like, but I also notice that now only Sam is left in the Uploaders
> field.
Rationale:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> control: tags -1 pending
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 21.03.2013, 22:32 +0400 schrieb Alexander V.
> Kudrevatykh:
>> It will be nice if libdca0 starts use multiarch
>
> Fixed in GIT and ready for upload.
Not copying the bug, but still relevant
15 matches
Mail list logo
