Re: Introduction

Hi again! Another package I finished is panucci. It is an audio and podcast player with resuming function. It interacts great with gpodder. This is a pre- version from git, but works very good! I hope to get an invitation to your group! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed mess

Re: [SCM] faad2 packaging branch, master, updated. debian/2.7-4-5-ga421d73

Am 16.08.2010 18:41, schrieb Adrian Knoth: This seems to be a pretty big patch that should be implemented upstream. As a workaround, one might get along with something like this: #ifndef PATH_MAX #define PATH_MAX 1024 #endif Thanks for the feedback! I wasn't yet finished with this patch, anyw

libmp4v2 is needed for AAC support

gtkpot 1.0.0, which has been released last week, is able to dlopen() libmp4v2: ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-

Bug#593162: marked as done (audacity: Audacity fails to load libavformat)

Am 16.08.2010 22:54, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: If this requires faac, then right, we don't support non-free stuff and actually do care for licensing issues. No, but it requires libmp4v2 which is licensed under the MPL whereas gtkpod itself is licensed under the GPL. So, yes, this is a licensin

Re: uploaded first pkg: pd-motex

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 00:22:25 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote: > On 16/08/10 17:47, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > >> It seems that this thread gets easily hijacked ;) Returning to the >> Subject, I think pd-motex is ready for upload, thanks all for the >> feedback! > > How are you editing debia

Re: uploaded first pkg: pd-motex

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 01:03:57 (CEST), Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> How are you editing debian/changelog? The timestamp is old! > > Ah, oops, I forgot dch. I've been using emacs. You might want to install the 'dpkg-dev-el' package, which features debian-changelog-mode. Here, you can easil

Re: uploaded first pkg: pd-motex

On Aug 16, 2010, at 8:04 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On 16/08/10 19:03, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Aug 16, 2010, at 6:22 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On 16/08/10 17:47, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: It seems that this thread gets easily hijacked ;) Returning to the Subject, I think pd-m

Re: uploaded first pkg: pd-motex

On 16/08/10 19:03, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > On Aug 16, 2010, at 6:22 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: > >> On 16/08/10 17:47, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> >>> It seems that this thread gets easily hijacked ;) Returning to the >>> Subject, I think pd-motex is ready for upload, thanks all fo

Re: uploaded first pkg: pd-motex

On Aug 16, 2010, at 6:22 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On 16/08/10 17:47, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: It seems that this thread gets easily hijacked ;) Returning to the Subject, I think pd-motex is ready for upload, thanks all for the feedback! How are you editing debian/changelog? The times

Re: [Thank you] Felisz Cumpleaños...

On 16/08/10 18:27, Juan federico Martinez< wrote: > Querida Comunidad DebianFeliz Cumpleaños por miles de buenos y nuevos > cumpleaños haciendo el Sitestema Operativo Universal! Gracias por > garantizar nuestro libre acceso a la información y a la gestión de nuestra > cultura! Translation: De

[Thank you] Felisz Cumpleaños...

Querida Comunidad DebianFeliz Cumpleaños por miles de buenos y nuevos cumpleaños haciendo el Sitestema Operativo Universal! Gracias por garantizar nuestro libre acceso a la información y a la gestión de nuestra cultura! -- This is message was sent to you from http://thanks.debian.net _

Re: uploaded first pkg: pd-motex

On 16/08/10 17:47, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > It seems that this thread gets easily hijacked ;) Returning to the > Subject, I think pd-motex is ready for upload, thanks all for the > feedback! How are you editing debian/changelog? The timestamp is old! Also, there is no need to ship the GP

Re: uploaded first pkg: pd-motex

On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 14:30 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On 16/08/10 14:24, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 09:38 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > >> On 2010-08-16 03:31, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > I'm not a pd expert, but if I install some extensions,

Bug#593162: marked as done (audacity: Audacity fails to load libavformat)

On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 20:45:45 (CEST), Aaron Barany wrote: >> Well, for exactly reasons like this, I find installing libraries from >> 3rd party repositories problematic at least. > > I agree it's not ideal, but unfortunately there's some functionality that > isn't present in the main repositori

Re: uploaded first pkg: pd-motex

On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 20:50:50 (CEST), IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > On 2010-08-16 20:24, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> >> I don't see why this is Debian-specific though. It really is an >> upstream issue, this should be documented as part of zexy, not Debian. >> > > sure, but right now i h

Re: uploaded first pkg: pd-motex

On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 08:55:19PM +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: On 2010-08-16 20:30, Felipe Sateler wrote: I don't see why this is Debian-specific though. It really is an upstream issue, this should be documented as part of zexy, not Debian. I think I understand now, and I agree with Ha

Re: gmerlin-avdecoder redux

On 2010-08-12 19:33, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > Do you think you could do the upstream-tarball.mk thing to the > gmerlin-avdecoder package? The folders in question are: > > lib/libwin32dll > lib/GSM610 > regarding the lib/GSM610 folder, on the gmerlin list people don't see why it shouldn't

Re: uploaded first pkg: pd-motex

On 2010-08-16 20:30, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> I don't see why this is Debian-specific though. It really is an >> upstream issue, this should be documented as part of zexy, not Debian. > > I think I understand now, and I agree with Hans. That documentation > should go upstream, not in a debian rea

Re: uploaded first pkg: pd-motex

On 2010-08-16 20:24, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > I don't see why this is Debian-specific though. It really is an > upstream issue, this should be documented as part of zexy, not Debian. > sure, but right now i have my debian-maintainer hat on, and zexy does not have a README. if an appli

Bug#593162: marked as done (audacity: Audacity fails to load libavformat)

> Well, for exactly reasons like this, I find installing libraries from > 3rd party repositories problematic at least. I agree it's not ideal, but unfortunately there's some functionality that isn't present in the main repositories. (for example, a build of gtkpod that supports AAC) > And I've as

Re: uploaded first pkg: pd-motex

On 16/08/10 14:24, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 09:38 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: >> On 2010-08-16 03:31, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: I'm not a pd expert, but if I install some extensions, I expect to be able to use them right away, without having to

Re: uploaded first pkg: pd-motex

On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 09:38 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > On 2010-08-16 03:31, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > >> > >> I'm not a pd expert, but if I install some extensions, I expect to be > >> able to use them right away, without having to invoke pd with special > >> args. I'm getting the im

[Thank you] Thanks

Thanks for the effort guys. Really is much appreciated. Words are not enough to thank. -- This is message was sent to you from http://thanks.debian.net ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http:/

[Thank you] Thanks

Thanks everyone for helping to mentor me however stupid the questions and happy Debian Appreciation Day! -- This is message was sent to you from http://thanks.debian.net ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth

qsampler 0.2.2-2 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the qsampler source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.2.2-1 Current version: 0.2.2-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receiv

Re: [SCM] faad2 packaging branch, master, updated. debian/2.7-4-5-ga421d73

On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:27:14PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > +-char aacFileName[255]; > > +-char audioFileName[255]; > > +-char adtsFileName[255]; > > ++char aacFileName[PATH_MAX + 1]; > > ++char audioFileName[PATH_MAX + 1]; > > ++char adtsFileName[PATH_MAX + 1]; >

jconvolver 0.8.7-2 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the jconvolver source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.8.7-1 Current version: 0.8.7-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will rece

audacity 1.3.12-5 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the audacity source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.3.12-4 Current version: 1.3.12-5 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will rece

Re: [SCM] faad2 packaging branch, master, updated. debian/2.7-4-5-ga421d73

On 16/08/10 10:36, fabian-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: > The following commit has been merged in the master branch: > commit a421d733a6b9f24c72326e08bddccdbd5bc0ddf3 > Author: Fabian Greffrath > Date: Mon Aug 16 16:39:32 2010 +0200 > > Extend file name buffers for longer path names.

Bug#591802: FTBFS on sparc: [po/fr/LC_MESSAGES/csound5.mo] Error -11

Dear release team, On 14/08/10 10:31, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On 06/08/10 14:12, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> Felipe Sateler (06/08/2010): >>> I also just managed to build it on smetana. Looks like the buildd is >>> borked. >>> >>> What should I do next? >> >> I guess I'm going to give it back again

Processed: bug 590021 is forwarded to http://trac.jackaudio.org/ticket/189

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 590021 http://trac.jackaudio.org/ticket/189 Bug #590021 [jackd1] jackd1: watchdog problems Bug #464886 [jackd1] jackd: wrongly killed by watchdog Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://trac.jackaudio.org/ticket/189'. Set Bug forwarded-t

Re: gmerlin-avdecoder redux

On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:32:44AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: On 15/08/10 07:13, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 11:33:51AM +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: On 08/15/2010 09:00 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 21:30:32 (CEST), IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: Wel

Introduction

Hi! My name is Thomas Maass from Germany. I am working with Debian several years. I have started with SuSe 8.0, and came to Debian with Woody. Since then I stayed on Debian. Now I want to help. I'd like to join the Debian multimedia team. I have created an alioth account and subscribed to the maili

traverso_0.49.2-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: traverso_0.49.2-1.debian.tar.gz to main/t/traverso/traverso_0.49.2-1.debian.tar.gz traverso_0.49.2-1.dsc to main/t/traverso/traverso_0.49.2-1.dsc traverso_0.49.2-1_i386.deb to main/t/traverso/traverso_0.49.2-1_i386.deb traverso_0.49.2.orig.tar.gz to main/t/traverso/traverso_0.4

Re: gmerlin-avdecoder redux

On 15/08/10 07:13, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 11:33:51AM +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: >> On 08/15/2010 09:00 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >>> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 21:30:32 (CEST), IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: >>> >>> Well, the point of symbols file is actually to review th

[Thank you] Terminal server/Workstation

I love debian GNU/Linux because this linux distro after being installed is ready for use and play music off-line. This is perfect where people don't have internet connectivity. The box installed either with Debian GNU/Linux lenny or Debian Edu 5.0.4 will run perfectly well and users/students/pup

Processing of traverso_0.49.2-1_i386.changes

traverso_0.49.2-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: traverso_0.49.2-1.dsc traverso_0.49.2.orig.tar.gz traverso_0.49.2-1.debian.tar.gz traverso_0.49.2-1_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___

Re: Licensing of gmerlin-avdecoder regression tests

On 2010-08-16 13:21, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > As I understand it, in principle we are safe if we can ensure that > 4-clause BSD only affects code parts that are not compiled into any of > the binary code that we redistribute. > > Ideal for us (and for other distributors, I guess) would be if

[Thank you] Love you!

Thank you so much for your lifes! It's always goodt to know that people like you exist in this world. -- This is message was sent to you from http://thanks.debian.net ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.d

Re: uploaded first pkg: pd-motex

On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 08:28:05PM -0400, Alexandre Quessy wrote: Hello, 2010/8/12 Jonas Smedegaard :  2. Release a tarball (with debian subdir stripped) I just wanted to stress out the fact that the debian directory need to be out of the upstream tarball. (and repository) It took me a few

Bug#593162: marked as done (audacity: Audacity fails to load libavformat)

On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:39:13PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 09:25:12 (CEST), Aaron Barany wrote: and the standard squeeze install has 0.5.1. (which also means that the standard squeeze libraries might experience the same problem) And I've asked you to check this.

Bug#593162: marked as done (audacity: Audacity fails to load libavformat)

reopen 593162 thanks On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 07:37:45AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 00:27:04 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Bug hereby closed. Please do tell us if your experienced problem is reproducible using only Debian packages, and we will investigate further.

Processed: Re: Bug#593162: marked as done (audacity: Audacity fails to load libavformat)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 593162 Bug #593162 {Done: Jonas Smedegaard } [audacity] audacity: Audacity fails to load libavformat > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 593162: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug

Re: Licensing of gmerlin-avdecoder regression tests

On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:12:29AM +0200, Burkhard Plaum wrote: hope this gets through, since I'm not subscribed. Worked fine (not sure if strings were pulled behind the curtain) Am 14.08.2010 23:04, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: Hi Burkhard (cc public Debian multimedia team mailinglist), I sug

Re: gmerlin-avdecoder redux

On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 01:12:14AM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Sat, 2010-08-14 at 21:30 +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: Another little detail, I recall that gmerlin-avdecoder 1.0.3 depends on a certain version on gavl, I believe that's 1.1.1 or 1.1.2. Also, I don't quite underst

Re: Licensing of gmerlin-avdecoder regression tests

On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:12:29 (CEST), Burkhard Plaum wrote: >> >> More troublesome, but maybe also more difficult to solve, I discovered >> that some source files are licensed as 4-clause BSD which is >> incompatible with GPLv2. >> >> These are the files I found containing 4-clause BSD licensin

Bug#593162: marked as done (audacity: Audacity fails to load libavformat)

On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 09:25:12 (CEST), Aaron Barany wrote: > Just to provide a bit more information, I'm using debian-multimedia, which > is why my ffmpeg libraries are newer than what's in the standard debian > repositories. This thread on Audacity forums ( > http://forum.audacityteam.org/viewt

Re: ITP: libcrystalhd2 -- Library for Broadcom Crystal HD video decoder cards

On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 08:19:40 (CEST), Andres Mejia wrote: > On Tuesday 10 August 2010 23:38:09 Reinhard Tartler wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 14:39:19 (EDT), Andres Mejia wrote: >> > Is there any progress with getting libcrystalhd2 into Debian? I would >> > like to help if that's alright. >

Re: Licensing of gmerlin-avdecoder regression tests

Hi, hope this gets through, since I'm not subscribed. Am 14.08.2010 23:04, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: Hi Burkhard (cc public Debian multimedia team mailinglist), I am a Debian developer and recently got involved in the maintainance of multimedia project packaging. During a copyright and licens

Bug#588468: vlc should provide correct error message

Package: vlc Version: 1.1.2-1 Severity: normal Among with the error reported into bug #588468, vlc displays an error message in the gnome GUI which says "there is nothing to do to correct this problem". Instead, it should tell the user to install the vlc-plugin-zbvi package. With best regards, H

Re: gmerlin-avdecoder redux

On 2010-08-16 07:12, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> >> and of course the debian/copyright has to be updated; hans? > > Wow, its not pretty in the land of copyright statements. There are more > files with the bad BSD license: > > lib/base64.c > lib/os.c > include/bgav_sem.h right. see jonas'

Re: Maintaining tasks files

On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 07:32:38PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 17:46:18 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote: > > On 13/08/10 10:57, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 09:49:01 (CEST), Andreas Tille wrote: > >> Well, I think defining these tasks is not easy at

Bug#593162: marked as done (audacity: Audacity fails to load libavformat)

Just to provide a bit more information, I'm using debian-multimedia, which is why my ffmpeg libraries are newer than what's in the standard debian repositories. This thread on Audacity forums ( http://forum.audacityteam.org/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=28048) documents the problem, and also includes a patc

Re: uploaded first pkg: pd-motex

On 2010-08-16 03:31, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> >> I'm not a pd expert, but if I install some extensions, I expect to be >> able to use them right away, without having to invoke pd with special >> args. I'm getting the impression that we are not living up to that >> expectation. > > You can

Re: separate discussion and development lists

On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 11:05:39PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > What do "Skolelinux" mean[1]? In the sense that it was an external fork (like DeMuDi, but for different reasons) which now in the Debian Edu effort tries to merge back to Debian. In my eyes this currently happens also with DeMuDi

Re: separate discussion and development lists

On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:08:03AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > We could say: bug reports go to pkg-multimedia, all other discussion > goes to debian-multimedia? I'm still not sure if it is a good move or > not. I've not seen much discussion around multimedia going on... but > maybe we are discou