On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 08:55:19PM +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
On 2010-08-16 20:30, Felipe Sateler wrote:I don't see why this is Debian-specific though. It really is an upstream issue, this should be documented as part of zexy, not Debian.I think I understand now, and I agree with Hans. That documentation should go upstream, not in a debian readme.while my other mail might sound a bit sarcastic, please note that i totally agree.but it's still true that current upstream doesn't handle it, and most likely there won't be an upstream (bugfix) release just to add a README.so should the explanation be left out, or do you think it would be a good idea to add a README via a patch?
It makes perfect sense to me to add a README.Debian for information as long as upstream lack certain documentation in their releases.
- Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
