On 2014-09-19 19:34, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
On 19 Sep 2014, at 15:59, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
heraclitus actually said, "everything _flows_" (panta rhei).
No he said: Πάντα ῥεῖ ;-)
true... :-D
On 19 Sep 2014, at 15:59, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
> heraclitus actually said, "everything _flows_" (panta rhei).
No he said: Πάντα ῥεῖ ;-)
thanks for the warm welcome. :)
the self vm while interesting, isn't as portable as "squeak" and it's
derived systems.
~mayuresh
On 2014-09-19 18:06, Thierry Goubier wrote:
Welcome back!
You convinced me to have a look at Self, which I didn't in, what, more
than 15 years? They even have mu
what i've wanted is a pure-objects system.
somehow, none of the options (python, ruby, obj-c) come close to
fulfilling my requirements the way smalltalk does.
i do have certain ideas i wish to explore which require an object system
to as deep a level as possible with a certain liveness to it (
Welcome back!
Doru
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
> hello all,
>
> i had to do it.
> after listening to everybody's comments about my questions to the list, i
> went out and checked on the current state of squeak and self.
>
> looks like squeak and self definitely need a
Welcome back!
You convinced me to have a look at Self, which I didn't in, what, more than
15 years? They even have multiple host windows :)
Thierry
2014-09-19 14:07 GMT+02:00 Mayuresh Kathe :
> hello all,
>
> i had to do it.
> after listening to everybody's comments about my questions to the li
it all comes down to what you want. You are not obliged to even use
Smalltalk in the first place, what matter is what you want to do ? What
project you have in mind ? what are your goals ? how you want to achieve
them ? etc
Pharo comes with its own set of problems and flaws like any other language
welcome back !
On 19 Sep 2014, at 14:07, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
> hello all,
>
> i had to do it.
> after listening to everybody's comments about my questions to the list, i
> went out and checked on the current state of squeak and self.
>
> looks like squeak and self definitely need a lot of a
hello all,
i had to do it.
after listening to everybody's comments about my questions to the list,
i went out and checked on the current state of squeak and self.
looks like squeak and self definitely need a lot of attention from
experienced developers and visionaries.
since i don't fall sq
