I am using the github interface to do so like this
https://github.com/kilon/Ephestos/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=ephestos
github also provides a set of keywords to refine searches, I think also
regex is supported,you can find more info in these links
https://help.github.com/articles/searching-github
Could you give examples of code searches that you would be able to do in
the history.
I think that for searching the history of a method or class, it is simpler
(and faster) to do it in git than it is to do it in monticello.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Dimitris Chloupis
wrote:
> Github has
Github has a search code facility , unless you mean something else. We
could take advantage of that and unite it with our ability to browse
implementors and classes. There is no limit how deeply we can integrate
with git and github and we can extend both via Pharo to make them more
Pharo friendly.
2016-07-26 9:01 GMT+02:00 Serge Stinckwich :
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Sean Glazier
> wrote:
> > Thank you, Peter for documenting that :-). While I think git tools are
> OK,
> > my opinion though is that Smalltalk hub should be moved forward as well.
> At
> > cincom the Store experience
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Sean Glazier wrote:
> Thank you, Peter for documenting that :-). While I think git tools are OK,
> my opinion though is that Smalltalk hub should be moved forward as well. At
> cincom the Store experience started out painful and it has its quirks, but
> one of the
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 08:08:49PM -0300, Hernán Morales Durand wrote:
> 2016-07-25 19:33 GMT-03:00 Sean Glazier :
>
> > Thank you, Peter for documenting that :-). While I think git tools are OK,
> > my opinion though is that Smalltalk hub should be moved forward as well. At
> > cincom the Store e
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 06:33:48PM -0400, Sean Glazier wrote:
> Thank you, Peter for documenting that :-). While I think git tools are OK,
> my opinion though is that Smalltalk hub should be moved forward as well.
While SmalltalkHub works for code storage, it is also just that, a storage.
Trying t
On 07/25/2016 03:33 PM, Sean Glazier wrote:
I git you are working with files and text and it does not have the
notion of classes and methods and the value of being able to see the
history of the class / methods.
FileTree is the layer that lives between the directory structure on disk
and the
>
>
> Well I wasn't sure if I should be reporting things now (because obviously
> it's incomplete), and I saw 58 issues on github, so didn't want to add
> more.
> But if you want some feedback :)
>
Yes, feedback is necessary... even knowing that you are using it is good
news for me.
>
2016-07-25 19:33 GMT-03:00 Sean Glazier :
> Thank you, Peter for documenting that :-). While I think git tools are OK,
> my opinion though is that Smalltalk hub should be moved forward as well. At
> cincom the Store experience started out painful and it has its quirks, but
> one of the advantages
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:49:41PM +0200, Nicolas Passerini wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Peter Uhnak wrote:
>
> > IceBerg, which is hopefully the future of git in Pharo (
> > https://github.com/npasserini/iceberg )
> >
>
> Well, I hope so :)
>
> Iceberg is under development, but be
Thank you, Peter for documenting that :-). While I think git tools are OK,
my opinion though is that Smalltalk hub should be moved forward as well. At
cincom the Store experience started out painful and it has its quirks, but
one of the advantages is that I could write tools to do things like brows
I look forward to using Iceberg !
Kind Regards,
Sean Glazier
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Peter Uhnak wrote:
> Hi Juraj,
>
> I've finally forced myself to finish a guide on using gitfiletree:
> https://www.peteruhnak.com/blog/2016/07/25/how-to-use-git-and-github-with-pharo/
> so hopefull
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Peter Uhnak wrote:
> IceBerg, which is hopefully the future of git in Pharo (
> https://github.com/npasserini/iceberg )
>
Well, I hope so :)
Iceberg is under development, but beta testers and feedback are welcome. I
will be happy to help you if you intend to ado
Hi Peter,
thanks for documenting all that :)
Thierry
Le 25/07/2016 à 19:28, Peter Uhnak a écrit :
Hi Juraj,
I've finally forced myself to finish a guide on using gitfiletree:
https://www.peteruhnak.com/blog/2016/07/25/how-to-use-git-and-github-with-pharo/
so hopefully it will be of some use
Hi Juraj,
I've finally forced myself to finish a guide on using gitfiletree:
https://www.peteruhnak.com/blog/2016/07/25/how-to-use-git-and-github-with-pharo/
so hopefully it will be of some use to you.
Couple of notes:
* GitFileTree loaded from Catalog still doesn't work in Pharo 6, so
Hi Alexandre,
I will first give a try. I think once the Pharo community moves to GitHub, it
will help to all. It could be painful, but SmalltalkHub is also painful and we
are loosing other opportunities that GitHub service offers.
I agree that it could be painful. I am fine using external GIT
Hi Juraj,
Although I find very appealing to work with Git, it is still very painful. Some
of the issues I feel right now: difficult of merging, checking for source code
differences, there is unfortunately a difference between installing using
Metacello and cloning a repository, …
We can discus
Hi Juraj,
I haven't created a Pharo6 configuration for GitFileTree, for now loading
should be done by Metacello.
Metacello new
baseline: 'FileTree';
repository: 'github://dalehenrich/filetree:pharo6.0_dev/repository';
load: 'Git'
2016-07-25 14:41 GMT+02:00 Juraj Kubelka :
> Hi,
>
>
Hi,
can you point me to a latest (best) way to use GitHub for Pharo projects (Pharo
6)?
Is the GitFileTree project the way to use it?
How does ConfigurationOf change?
Thanks!
Juraj
20 matches
Mail list logo
