> > > Well I wasn't sure if I should be reporting things now (because obviously > it's incomplete), and I saw 58 issues on github, so didn't want to add > more.
> But if you want some feedback :) > Yes, feedback is necessary... even knowing that you are using it is good news for me. > * (confusing) The colors of the working copy / local repo should > be switched, because now it's showing me new code in red, and removed code > in green, which is confusing > Yes, I know. I was stubborn in putting my version in the left, but I didn't find the way to customize the diff tool to show colors properly. Also the diff does not highlight correctly, at some point I will have to get my hands on it, but I didn't have the time yet. > * (really minor) Opening the synchronizing window by double > clicking on the repository (instead of clicking on the button) will open it > four times > Again, yes... I do not know if this is a bug of Glamour, I've posted a question but didn't get answers... I have to insist :) > * (docs) from readme file it's not clear whether I have to run the > update command; running it will brick the installation > Update is not mandatory, but should be a useful way to get the latest version. I'm not sure of having understood you, is that you tried it and it failed? > * (yay!) I am really happy I can use it side-by-side with > gitfiletree so I always have a fallback option > :+1: > * (unsure) I wasn't sure from the docs / experiments whether I can > point it to local clone, or always have to use github > Yes you can. When creating a repository, just change the default location. (Yet it is a bit confusing because it still asks you for a remote url instead of using that of the clone you selected... I have to improve it.) > I am really looking forward to this project, and I am slowly starting to > use it for some smaller projects, so more feedback will certainly come. :) > > Thanks! > > Peter > > Thank you!
