I am using the github interface to do so like this https://github.com/kilon/Ephestos/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=ephestos
github also provides a set of keywords to refine searches, I think also regex is supported,you can find more info in these links https://help.github.com/articles/searching-github/ https://help.github.com/articles/advanced-search/ https://help.github.com/articles/search-syntax/ https://help.github.com/articles/searching-code/ https://help.github.com/articles/searching-issues/ https://help.github.com/articles/searching-users/ On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 3:19 PM Nicolas Passerini <npasser...@gmail.com> wrote: > Could you give examples of code searches that you would be able to do in > the history. > > I think that for searching the history of a method or class, it is simpler > (and faster) to do it in git than it is to do it in monticello. > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.al...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Github has a search code facility , unless you mean something else. We >> could take advantage of that and unite it with our ability to browse >> implementors and classes. There is no limit how deeply we can integrate >> with git and github and we can extend both via Pharo to make them more >> Pharo friendly. >> >> On the subject of smalltalkhub it was always of question who will >> maintain it. But is one thing to want something another to take control and >> responsibility for it. None stoping anyone from contributing to anything. >> Problem is sthub will need a ton of work to be a good alternative to >> github. >> >> On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 at 01:36, Sean Glazier <sglazier...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Thank you, Peter for documenting that :-). While I think git tools are >>> OK, my opinion though is that Smalltalk hub should be moved forward as >>> well. At cincom the Store experience started out painful and it has its >>> quirks, but one of the advantages is that I could write tools to do things >>> like browse senders and implementors in the repository. I git you are >>> working with files and text and it does not have the notion of classes and >>> methods and the value of being able to see the history of the class / >>> methods. It is valuable when needing to understand not just the current >>> implementation but where it came from. In Store, I could search and see >>> when a method was present of a class and in what version lets say it got >>> dropped unintentionally for instance. Even more important I think is to >>> also note thing like renames and in cincom namespace renames and moves. >>> I was working a while back on a way to have a persistent diary for a >>> class that could note these histories and maintained and more importantly >>> searchable from the image. >>> I wrote tools too, to attach to a number of databases (repositories) and >>> search for classes and the comments. Helpful when you are searching to see >>> if someone else has solved a problem before. Git tools can tell you a lot >>> about the repository you are publishing to and comparing code etc. But it >>> does not help you to search across repositories and the data. >>> >>> I know this idea is a tall order. If we improved our tools to beable do >>> this, no matter what the repository is behind it, that would be very >>> helpful and powerful. I think it is a challenge in git because it is >>> dealing with text and does not have a notion of what a class is etc. If we >>> continue and put in more powerful search abilities, it will require using >>> different paradigm in representing code so we can do more powerful things >>> with the repository. We can browse the class without loading it but that >>> gets us only so far. >>> >>> Just my 0.02 ;-) >>> >>> >>> >>> Kind Regards, >>> >>> Sean Glazier >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Peter Uhnak <i.uh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Juraj, >>>> >>>> I've finally forced myself to finish a guide on using gitfiletree: >>>> https://www.peteruhnak.com/blog/2016/07/25/how-to-use-git-and-github-with-pharo/ >>>> so hopefully it will be of some use to you. >>>> >>>> Couple of notes: >>>> * GitFileTree loaded from Catalog still doesn't work in Pharo >>>> 6, so use the script Thierry provided >>>> * There's some pain associated with some operations (e.g. >>>> merging, loading), this will be addressed sooner or later by IceBerg, which >>>> is hopefully the future of git in Pharo ( >>>> https://github.com/npasserini/iceberg ) >>>> >>>> Peter >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 11:47:24AM -0400, Juraj Kubelka wrote: >>>> > Hi Alexandre, >>>> > >>>> > I will first give a try. I think once the Pharo community moves to >>>> GitHub, it will help to all. It could be painful, but SmalltalkHub is also >>>> painful and we are loosing other opportunities that GitHub service offers. >>>> > >>>> > I agree that it could be painful. I am fine using external GIT tools. >>>> Even for Java (or other) projects I use external GIT tools. The important >>>> is that we can easily deploy projects and people can load it (,e.g., >>>> Catalog Browser). >>>> > >>>> > Cheers, >>>> > Juraj >>>> > >>>> > > On Jul 25, 2016, at 09:14, Alexandre Bergel < >>>> alexandre.ber...@me.com> wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > > Hi Juraj, >>>> > > >>>> > > Although I find very appealing to work with Git, it is still very >>>> painful. Some of the issues I feel right now: difficult of merging, >>>> checking for source code differences, there is unfortunately a difference >>>> between installing using Metacello and cloning a repository, … >>>> > > We can discuss it if you want (I am back in Chile). >>>> > > >>>> > > Alexandre >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > >> On Jul 25, 2016, at 8:41 AM, Juraj Kubelka < >>>> juraj.kube...@icloud.com> wrote: >>>> > >> >>>> > >> Hi, >>>> > >> >>>> > >> can you point me to a latest (best) way to use GitHub for Pharo >>>> projects (Pharo 6)? >>>> > >> >>>> > >> Is the GitFileTree project the way to use it? >>>> > >> >>>> > >> How does ConfigurationOf change? >>>> > >> >>>> > >> Thanks! >>>> > >> Juraj >>>> > > >>>> > > -- >>>> > > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>>> > > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>>> > > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>> >
