providing debug
information
on those, as well as native speaker wording.
Cheers,
//GeorgiosFrom 8dfe12b08378571add6e1d178bed97a61e988593 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Georgios Kokolatos
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 09:58:49 +
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/2] Prepare pg_dump for additional compression met
List of relations
Schema | Name| Type | Owner | Table | Persistence | Access method |
Size| Description
Since '\dl' already contains description, it might be worthwhile to consider to
add the column `Access privileges`
without introducing a verbose version.
Thoughts?
Cheers,
//Georgios
g the above as:
show_verbose = strchr(cmd, '+') ? true : false;
else if (strcmp(cmd + 3, "list") == 0
success = do_lo_list(show_verbose);
Thoughts?
Cheers,
//Georgios
ments. Finally the
integrity of the compressed files is verified.
I hope you find this useful.
Cheers,
//Georgios
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/ZCm1J5vfyQ2E6dYvXz8si39HQ2gwxSZ3IpYaVgYa3lUwY88SLapx9EEnOf5uEwrddhx2twG7zYKjVeuP5MwZXCNPybtsGouDsAD1o2L_I5E%3D%40pm.me
v1-0001-Intr
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, March 10, 2021 1:23 PM, Georgios
wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Thursday, February 18, 2021 10:54 AM, Amit Langote amitlangot...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 6
Hi,
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, February 18, 2021 10:54 AM, Amit Langote
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 6:52 PM Amit Langote amitlangot...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Based on the discussion at:
> > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6929d485-2d2a-da46-3681-4a400a3d794f%40en
PartitionTupleRouting and not add
a couple of functions to get the necessary info? If I have read the code
correctly the only members actually needed to be exposed are num_partitions
and partitions. Not a critique, I am just curious.
Cheers,
//Georgios
of columns, reordered, and names
changed, a little opt-in flexibility with types too doesn't seem
misplaced.
end quote.
I will add that creating a view on the remote server with type flexibility that
you wish and then create foreign tables against the view, might address your
problem.
Respectfully,
//Georgios
> makes it clear what's its purpose.
My limited opinion on the matter after spending some time yesterday through
the related code, is that with the current api it is easy to miss something
and underestimate or just be sloppy. If only from the r
ixed rather
vaguely with this patch. I am not claiming that increasing the memory used by
the elements is not needed, I am claiming that I can not clearly see how is that
specific increase needed.
Thank you for your patience,
//Georgios -- https://www.vmware.com
>
> [1] https://forums.postgresql.fr/viewtopic.php?pid=32138#p32138 sorry, it's
> all
> in French.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, March 2, 2021 5:51 PM, Vik Fearing wrote:
> On 3/2/21 4:06 PM, Georgios Kokolatos wrote:
>
> > As a minor gripe, I would note the addition of list_int_cmp.
> > The block
> >
> > - /* S
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: not tested
Implements feature: not tested
Spec compliant: not tested
Documentation:not tested
Hi,
this is a useful feature, thank you for implementing. I gather that it f
Hi,
this patch fails on the cfbot yet it has received an update during the current
CF.
I will move it to the next CF and mark it there as Waiting on Author.
Cheers,
Georgios
The new status of this patch is: Needs review
This patch fails in the cfbot for quite some time now.
I shall close it as Return With Feedback and not move it to the next CF.
Please feel free to register an updated version afresh for the next CF.
Cheers,
//Georgios
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, November 13, 2020 10:50 AM, Julien Rouhaud
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 8:34 PM Georgios Kokolatos
> gkokola...@protonmail.com wrote:
>
> > The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
> > ma
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, November 12, 2020 9:31 AM, Laurenz Albe
wrote:
> I wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2020-11-10 at 15:03 +0000, Georgios Kokolatos wrote:
> >
> > > I noticed that the cfbot fails for this patch.
> > > For this, I am setti
x. This is gin_extract_value_trgm() and is indeed using
generate_trgm().
I have no opinion over Alexander's second comment regarding costing.
I change the status to 'Waiting on Author', but please feel free to override
my opinion if you feel I am wrong and reset it to 'Needs review&
Hi,
I noticed that this patch fails on the cfbot.
For this, I changed the status to: 'Waiting on Author'.
Cheers,
//Georgios
The new status of this patch is: Waiting on Author
Hi,
I noticed that this patch fails on the cfbot.
For this, I changed the status to: 'Waiting on Author'.
Cheers,
//Georgios
The new status of this patch is: Waiting on Author
Hi,
just a quick comment that this patch fails on the cfbot.
Cheers,
//Georgios
Hi,
I noticed that this patch fails on the cfbot.
For this, I changed the status to: 'Waiting on Author'.
Cheers,
//Georgios
The new status of this patch is: Waiting on Author
Hi,
I noticed that this patch fails on the cfbot.
For this, I changed the status to: 'Waiting on Author'.
Cheers,
//Georgios
The new status of this patch is: Waiting on Author
Hi,
I noticed that this patch fails on the cfbot.
For this, I changed the status to: 'Waiting on Author'.
Cheers,
//Georgios
The new status of this patch is: Waiting on Author
Hi,
I noticed that this patch is failing on the cfbot.
For this, I changed the status to: 'Waiting on Author'
Cheers,
Georgios
The new status of this patch is: Waiting on Author
Hi,
I noticed that the cfbot fails for this patch.
For this, I am setting the status to: 'Waiting on Author'.
Cheers,
//Georgios
The new status of this patch is: Waiting on Author
changing the status to "Ready for Committer".
For what little is worth, I learned a lot from this patch, thank you.
Cheers,
Georgios
The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer
Hi,
thank you for your contribution.
I did notice that the cfbot [1] is failing for this patch.
Please try to address the issue for the upcoming commitfest.
Cheers,
//Georgios
[1] http://cfbot.cputube.org/dave-cramer.html
Hi,
thank you for you contribution.
I did notice that the cfbot [1] is failing for this patch.
Please try to address the issues for the upcoming Commitfest.
Cheers,
//Georgios
[1] http://cfbot.cputube.org/magnus-hagander.html
Hi,
thank you for your contribution.
I did notice that the cfbot [1] is failing for this patch.
Please try to address the issues if you can for the upcoming commitfest.
Cheers,
//Georgios
[1] http://cfbot.cputube.org/esteban-zimanyi.html
Hi,
thank you for your contribution.
I did notice that the cfbot [1] is not failing for this patch.
Cheers,
//Georgios
[1] http://cfbot.cputube.org/daniel-gustafsson.html
Hi,
I noticed that according to the cfbot this patch no longer applies.
As it is registered in the upcoming commitfest, it would be appreciated
if you could rebase it.
Cheers,
//Georgios
Hi,
this patch is in "Ready for committer" state and the Cfbot is happy.
Is there any committer that is available for taking a look at it?
Cheers,
//Georgios - CFM 2020-11
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, 10 September 2020 00:36, Justin Pryzby
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 12:35:19PM +0000, Georgios Kokolatos wrote:
>
> > I will humbly disagree with the current review. I shall refrain from
> > changing the status though bec
added in the
documentation.
Have you considered adding something in doc/src/sgml/ref/psql-ref.sgml? If no,
will you consider it? If yes, why did you discard it?
Regards,
Georgios
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: tested, passed
Implements feature: not tested
Spec compliant: not tested
Documentation:not tested
Version 2 of the patch, implements a useful feature. Based on the mailing
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 07:41, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 08:16:19AM +0000, Georgios wrote:
>
> > Please find version 7 attached which hopefully addresses the error along
> > with a proper
> > expansion
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, 19 August 2020 11:07, Georgios wrote:
>
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Friday, 7 August 2020 09:02, Asim Praveen pa...@vmware.com wrote:
>
> > > On 05-Aug-2020, at 7:01 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.
Thank you for the patch.
My high level review comment:
The patch seems to be implementing a useful and requested feature.
The patch applies cleanly and passes the basic regress tests. Also the
commitfest bot is happy.
A first pass at the code, has not revealed any worthwhile comments.
Please all
added it.
> > Attached a new patch for the same.
> > I felt patch is in shape for committer to have a look at this.
>
> The patch tester shows it's failing xmllint ; could you send a fixed patch ?
>
> /usr/bin/xmllint --path . --noout --valid postgres.sgml
> ref/
ht become a bit slow
in large files. Please find v3 which simply continues reading the line if
fgets fills the buffer and there is still data to read.
Also this version, implements Alvaro's suggestion to break API compatibility.
To that extent, ecpg regress has been slightly modified to use the
test suits. It should
not hurt to do a bit better though.
//Asim and Georgios
0001-Use-stringInfo-instead-of-char-in-replace_string.patch
Description: Binary data
0001-Heap-allocated-string-version-of-replace_string.patch
Description: Binary data
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, July 25, 2020 2:41 AM, vignesh C wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 7:35 PM Georgios gkokola...@protonmail.com wrote:
>
> > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> > On Saturday, July 11, 2020 3:16 PM, vignesh C vignes...@gmail.com w
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, July 21, 2020 11:52 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 1:35 AM Georgios Kokolatos
> gkokola...@protonmail.com wrote:
>
> > As a general overview, the series of patches in the mail thread do match
> > t
apply the
same here. The expression in the branch is already asserted for in macro, why
not switch there and remove the responsibility from the caller?
Any thoughts on the above?
Cheers,
Georgios
The new status of this patch is: Waiting on Author
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, July 11, 2020 3:16 PM, vignesh C wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 1:24 PM Georgios gkokola...@protonmail.com wrote:
>
> > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> > On Monday, July 6, 2020 3:12 AM, Michael Paquier mich...@paquier.xyz w
As a general overview, the series of patches in the mail thread do match their
description. The addition of the stricter, explicit use of instrumentation does
improve the design as the distinction of the use cases requiring a pin or a
lock is made more clear. The added commentary is descriptive
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, July 6, 2020 3:12 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 07:13:10AM +0530, vignesh C wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure if we should include showViews, I had seen that the
> > access method was not getting selected for view.
>
> +1. These have no
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, June 20, 2020 3:15 PM, vignesh C wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 6:13 PM Georgios gkokola...@protonmail.com wrote:
>
> > > Few comments:
> > >
> > > - if (pset.sversion >= 12)
> > >
> > &
calculate_relation_size can be adapted to call into the TableAm
for those kinds of relations that makes sense. If agreed, a more complete patch
can be provided.
Cheers,
//Georgios
0001-Use-tableam-for-pg_table_size.patch
Description: Binary data
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, June 15, 2020 3:20 AM, vignesh C wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 6:45 PM Georgios gkokola...@protonmail.com wrote:
>
> >
>
> > > Please add it to the commitfest at https://commitfest.postgresql.org/28/
> >
> > Than
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, June 10, 2020 12:08 PM, Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> On 2020-06-10 11:42, Georgios wrote:
>
> > Postgres create table statement supports `LIKE source_table [like_option...
> > ]`
> > to specify `a table from which the
parameters that interact both at relation and
column level, especially when the source relation is column oriented.
If the possibility for such a statment is not discarded, a patch can be readily
provided.
Cheers,
//Georgios
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/sql-createtable.html
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, June 9, 2020 1:34 PM, David Rowley wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 23:03, Georgios gkokola...@protonmail.com wrote:
>
> > A small patch is attached [1] to see if you think it makes sense. I have
> > not included any
> >
as needed.
Cheers,
//Georgios
0001-Include-AM-in-listTables-output.patch
Description: Binary data
Thank you for updating the status of the issue.
I have to admit that I completely missed the CF bot. Lesson learned.
For whatever is worth, my previous comment that the patch improves
readability also applies to the updated version of the patch.
The CF bot seems happy now, which means that your
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: not tested
Implements feature: not tested
Spec compliant: not tested
Documentation:not tested
It looks good and does what it says on the tin.
One minor nitpick I feel I s
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: not tested
Implements feature: not tested
Spec compliant: not tested
Documentation:not tested
In my humble opinion the patch improves readability, hence gets my +1.
No fu
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: not tested
Implements feature: not tested
Spec compliant: not tested
Documentation:not tested
> Ah, I see. I think I got that from ExplainPrintSettings. I've
> corrected m
>> + int num_workers = planstate->worker_instrument->num_workers;
>> + int n;
>> + worker_strs = (StringInfo *) palloc0(num_workers *
>> sizeof(StringInfo));
>> + for (n = 0; n < num_workers; n++) {
>>
>> I think C99 would be better here. Also no parenthesis needed.
>
>
> P
tern void ExplainCloseWorker(ExplainState *es);
+extern void ExplainFlushWorkers(StringInfo *worker_strs, int num_workers,
ExplainState *es);
No need to expose those, is there? I feel there should be static.
Awaiting for answer or resolution of these comments to change the status.
//Georgios
> Sounds good, I'll try that format. Any idea how to test YAML? With the
> JSON format, I was able to rely on Postgres' own JSON-manipulating
> functions to strip or canonicalize fields that can vary across
> executions--I can't really do that with YAML.
Yes, this approach was clear in the patch
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: tested, failed
Implements feature: not tested
Spec compliant: not tested
Documentation:not tested
The current version of the patch (v2) applies cleanly and does what it sa
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: not tested
Implements feature: not tested
Spec compliant: not tested
Documentation:not tested
This is a high level review only. However, seeing that there is a conflict an
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: not tested
Implements feature: not tested
Spec compliant: not tested
Documentation:not tested
Version 3 of the patch looks ready for committer.
Thank you for taking the t
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: not tested
Implements feature: not tested
Spec compliant: not tested
Documentation:not tested
For whatever it is worth, the patch looks good to me.
A minor nitpick would
Hi,
you are right in saying that my comment didn't offer much of a constructive
explanation.
Apologies for that.
To the issue at hand. Tests were run in the same manner as in all other cases
and the test
in question was the only one to fail in the whole tree.
By looking a bit closer to the err
Hi,
I applied the patch on current master and run the tests, but I am afraid that
the newly introduced test failed on installcheck-world:
```t/016_min_consistency.pl . # Looks like your test exited with 29
before it could output anything.
t/016_min_consistency.pl . Dubio
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: tested, failed
Implements feature: not tested
Spec compliant: not tested
Documentation:not tested
The second version of this patch seems to be in order and ready for commi
Overall the patch looks good and according to the previous discussion fulfils
its purpose.
It might be worthwhile to also check for errors on close in SaveSlotToPath().
pgstat_report_wait_end();
CloseTransientFile(fd);
/* rename to permanent file, fsync file and directo
69 matches
Mail list logo