‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Wednesday, March 10, 2021 1:23 PM, Georgios <gkokola...@protonmail.com> 
wrote:

>
>
> Hi,
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On Thursday, February 18, 2021 10:54 AM, Amit Langote amitlangot...@gmail.com 
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 6:52 PM Amit Langote amitlangot...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > Based on the discussion at:
> > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6929d485-2d2a-da46-3681-4a400a3d794f%40enterprisedb.com
> > > I'm posting the patch for $subject here in this new thread and I'll
> > > add it to the next CF per Tomas' advice.
> >
> > Done:https://commitfest.postgresql.org/32/2992/
>
> apparently I did not receive the review comment I sent via the commitfest app.
> Apologies for the chatter. Find the message-id here:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/161530518971.29967.9368488207318158252.pgcf%40coridan.postgresql.org

I continued looking a bit at the patch, yet I am either failing to see fix or I 
am
looking at the wrong thing. Please find attached a small repro of what my 
expectetions
were.

As you can see in the repro, I would expect the
 UPDATE local_root_remote_partitions SET a = 2;
to move the tuples to remote_partition_2 on the same transaction.
However this is not the case, with or without the patch.

Is my expectation of this patch wrong?

Cheers,
//Georgios

>
> > Amit Langote
> > EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment: repro.sql
Description: application/sql

Reply via email to