On Mon, 2024-10-07 at 20:11 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 04:36:09PM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > I think that the removal of the "adminpack" extension should
> > be listed in the section "migration to v17" as an incompatibility.
> >
> > I have seen one complaint that pg_
Denis Laxalde a écrit :
Michael Paquier a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 12:50:32PM +0500, Ibrar Ahmed wrote:
The patch requires a rebase, please do that.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 454 (offset 28 lines). 1 out of 5 hunks FAILED
-- saving rejects to file doc/src/sgml/ref/grant.sgml.rej
There has
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 6:25 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 06:33:29PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > > It is better to write the above statement as:
> > > > "pg_upgrade now preserves replication slots on
> > > > publishers and full subscription's state on subscribers". This i
Michael Paquier писал(а) 2024-10-08 05:01:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 02:39:13PM +0300, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
I was looking at enabling partition-wise join with whole row vars. My
main
motivation
was to enable push down DML with partition-wise join in postgres_fdw.
The
work is
based on the ea
On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 9:43 AM Peter Smith wrote:
>
> Hi Shubham, I don't have any new comments for the patch v36-0002.
>
> But, according to my records, there are multiple old comments not yet
> addressed for this patch. I am giving reminders for those below so
> they don't get accidentally overl
On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 at 18:47, Andrei Lepikhov wrote:
> Thanks, I suppose CATALOG_VERSION_NO was the only reason for this fail.
Please leave the cat version bump out of your patch. It's a waste of
time and resource if you plan to post another patch every time a
committer bumps the cat version.
Dav
On 10/8/24 08:19, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 04:25:59PM +0700, Andrei Lepikhov wrote:
I have written a sketch patch to implement the idea with aggregate
prosupport in code - see the attachment.
My intention was to provide an example, not a ready-to-commit patch.
As I see, the
Hi Kuroda-san,
> > I have also modified the tests in 0001 patch. These changes are only
> > related to syntax of writing tests.
>
> LGTM. I found small improvements, please find the attached.
I have applied the changes and updated the patch.
Thanks & Regards,
Shlok Kyal
From 07f94de76be177d0e397
Hi, here are some review comments for patch v11.
==
contrib/pg_logicalinspect/specs/logical_inspect.spec
1.
nit - Add some missing spaces after commas (,) in the SQL.
nit - Also update the expected results accordingly
==
doc/src/sgml/pglogicalinspect.sgml
2.
+
+
+ The pg_logicalins
On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 10:06 PM jian he wrote:
>
> assume v40 is the latest version.
make_bitmap_paths_for_or_group
{
/*
* First, try to match the whole group to the one index.
*/
orargs = list_make1(ri);
indlist = build_paths_for_OR(root, rel,
On 7/8/24 19:45, Andrei Lepikhov wrote:
On 3/11/2023 23:43, Tomas Vondra wrote:
On 9/11/23 10:04, Lepikhov Andrei wrote:
* Determine bucketsize fraction and MCV frequency for the inner
* relation. We use the smallest bucketsize or MCV frequency estimated
* for any individual hashclause; th
On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 09:54:21AM +, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 01:26:49PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> This would rely on the fact that we would use the ProcNumber for the
>> dshash key, and this information is not provided in pg_stat_activity.
>> Perhaps we should
On 9/23/24 20:02, Andrei Lepikhov wrote:
On 12/9/2024 12:12, David Rowley wrote:
On Thu, 12 Sept 2024 at 21:51, Andrei Lepikhov wrote:
Initial problem causes wrong cost_sort estimation. Right now I think
about providing cost_sort() the sort clauses instead of (or in addition
to) the pathkeys.
On 8/23/24 01:46, Andrei Lepikhov wrote:
Just a rebase onto current master to make cf-bot be happy.
--
regards, Andrei Lepikhov
From 73472897442516f0df4ed945cda28d125df08197 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Andrei V. Lepikhov"
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 11:20:46 +0700
Subject: [PATCH v2] Introduce th
On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 12:41:16PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> One benefit of supporting something like pg_ls_summariesdir() is that
> it allows us to view the last modification time of each WAL summary file
> and estimate when they'll be removed based on wal_summary_keep_time.
>
> Of course, we c
On 2024/10/07 23:35, Nathan Bossart wrote:
On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 10:07:10AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 10:02:11AM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
Could you explain why you feel the existing support functions are
insufficient?
Because it is not possible to outsourc
On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 04:47:12PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> The commit fest 2024-09 should have ended one week ago, so I have been
> taking one step ahead and I have begun cleaning up things. As of now,
> there is still a total of 113 patches marked as "Needs Review", and I
> hope that my n
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 09:47:20AM +0800, Junwang Zhao wrote:
> Thanks for your review.
The SPLIT/MERGE grammar has been reverted in 3890d90c1508, so this
patch concept does not apply anymore.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Dear Shlok,
> I have tested this part. I observed that ,whenever we insert data in a
> partition table, the function 'get_rel_sync_entry' is called and a
> hash entry is created for the corresponding leaf node relid. So I feel
> while invalidating here we can specify 'PUBLICATION_PART_LEAF' . I
>
On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 01:31:55PM +0200, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> I noticed I attached an older version of the patch which still had 1
> assertion failure case remaining (thanks cfbot), so here's v3 which
> solves that problem.
Peter G., this is in your area of expertise. Could you look at
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 11:05:56AM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> I tried implementing this, see the attached 0002 patch that replaces the
> fake LSN with an atomic counter in shared memory. It seems to work (more
> testing needed), but I can't say I'm very happy with the code :-(
While scanning qui
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 05:34:25PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> I got to do the detailed benchmarking on the latest version of the patch
> series, so here's the results. My goal was to better understand the
> impact of each patch individually - especially the two parts introduced
> by Matthias, but
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 02:39:13PM +0300, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
> I was looking at enabling partition-wise join with whole row vars. My main
> motivation
> was to enable push down DML with partition-wise join in postgres_fdw. The
> work is
> based on the earlier patches of Ashutosh Bapat [1].
T
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 09:08:00PM +0300, Сергей Соловьев wrote:
> From b5e779771e8a7582951aff6f43a716e9e5975884 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: "Sergey Solovev"
> Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 17:02:13 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] Add log_transaction configuration setting
CF bot is red, please provide a re
On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 02:39:20PM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> This is a series of patches to change styles, in assorted sources.
> IMO, this improves a tiny bit and is worth trying.
>
> 1. Avoid dereference iss_SortSupport if it has nulls.
> 2. Avoid dereference plan_node_id if no dsm area.
> 3
On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 03:44:01AM +, masahiro.ik...@nttdata.com wrote:
> Although I plan to support "Rows Removed by Non Key Filtered"(or "Skip Scan
> Filtered"),
> I'd like to know whether the current direction is good. One of my concerns is
> there might
> be a better way to exact quals fo
I wrote:
> I get this error when running pgindent with perl 5.40:
>
> Attempt to call undefined import method with arguments ("devnull") via
> package "File::Spec" (Perhaps you forgot to load the package?) at
> src/tools/pgindent/pgindent line 10.
> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at s
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 07:34:30AM +0200, Joel Jacobson wrote:
> Hmm, strange, the commitfest system didn't pick up the email with patch 0006
> for some reason,
> with message id 0c5a6b79-408c-4910-9b2e-4aa9a7b30...@app.fastmail.com
>
> It's rebased to latest HEAD, so not sure why.
>
> Maybe it
I get this error when running pgindent with perl 5.40:
Attempt to call undefined import method with arguments ("devnull") via
package "File::Spec" (Perhaps you forgot to load the package?) at
src/tools/pgindent/pgindent line 10.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at src/tools/pgindent/pgi
On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 04:25:59PM +0700, Andrei Lepikhov wrote:
> I have written a sketch patch to implement the idea with aggregate
> prosupport in code - see the attachment.
> My intention was to provide an example, not a ready-to-commit patch.
> As I see, the only problem there lies in the test
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 06:33:29PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > It is better to write the above statement as:
> > > "pg_upgrade now preserves replication slots on
> > > publishers and full subscription's state on subscribers". This is
> > > because replication slots are preserved on publishers.
On Fri, 2024-10-04 at 15:24 +0200, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
> Great! I had been planning to do this myself so great to see that you
> already did it before me. Will take a look at this work later.
Great! We'll need to test whether there are any regressions in the
regex & pattern matching code due t
On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 04:36:09PM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> I think that the removal of the "adminpack" extension should
> be listed in the section "migration to v17" as an incompatibility.
>
> I have seen one complaint that pg_upgrade fails if the extension
> is installed, but a dump/restore
> On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 22:20:55 +0900
> Yugo Nagata wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 15:16:52 +0900
>> Yugo NAGATA wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, 01 Oct 2024 10:33:50 +0900 (JST)
>> > Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>> >
>> > > >> That's because non-breaking space (nbsp) is not encoded as 0xa0 in
>> > > >> UTF-8. nb
On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 07:25:11PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Yes. This change on CREATE INDEX was introduced by 2af07e2f7 together with
> > other commands, but it was missed to be mentioned in the commit message
> > although the description was added to the documentation.
> >
> > The change
On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 01:19:59AM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> Commit 430ce189fc45 unexpectedly caused psql to report the error
> "error: trailing data found" when a connection URI contains
> a whitespace, e.g., in a parameter value. For example,
> the following command used to work but no longer d
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 02:20:21PM +0900, Yugo NAGATA wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Sep 2024 21:19:11 -0400
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 02:19:21PM +0900, Yugo Nagata wrote:
> > > On Thu, 9 May 2024 00:03:50 -0400
> > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have committed the first
On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 10:45 AM Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Generally looks good. Should we have a check in
> setJsonLexContextOwnsTokens() that we haven't started parsing yet, for
> the incremental case?
Good catch. Added in v4.
> > At the moment, we have a test matrix consisting of "standard front
Robert Haas writes:
> On Sat, Oct 5, 2024 at 3:35 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>> BTW, getting off the question of EXPLAIN output for a moment,
>> I don't understand why disable_cost is still a thing. The
>> one remaining usage seems trivial to replace, as attached.
> I believe I commented on that somewh
On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 8:56 AM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In
> "Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations"
> on Fri, 27 Sep 2024 16:33:13 -0700,
> Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>
> >> * 0005 (that add "void *opaque" to Copy{From,To}StateData)
> >> has a bit ne
On 05/10/2024 22:51, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas writes:
Sadly Windows' IO::Socket::UNIX hasn't been implemented on Windows (or
at least on this perl distribution we're using in Cirrus CI):
Socket::pack_sockaddr_un not implemented on this architecture at
C:/strawberry/5.
On Thu, 5 Sept 2024 at 23:28, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> Okay, I've done this now.
Is this blocked on anything? I feel it's ready to merge at this point.
I'd really like to not have this problem with trailing whitespace in
sgml files anymore.
On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 03:37:35PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 09:28:54AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> Correct, sorry for being unclear. The consistency argument would be to
>> expand
>> pg_upgrade to report all invalid databases rather than just the first found;
>
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 11:59:48AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 30 Sep 2024, at 11:03, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> >
> I think there's an unnecessary underscore in config.sgml.
> >
> > I was wrong. The particular byte sequences just looked an underscore
> > on my editor but the byte seq
On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 09:28:54AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 1 Oct 2024, at 00:20, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > Daniel Gustafsson writes:
> >>> On 30 Sep 2024, at 16:55, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> TBH I'm not finding anything very much wrong with the current
> >>> behavior... this has to be
On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 02:00:05PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> I refrained from introducing INT64_HEX_FORMAT/UINT64_HEX_FORMAT in c.h
> because I felt there was a nonzero chance of that causing problems with
> third-party code on the back-branches. We could probably add them for v18,
> though.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 02:10:47PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> Alright. I was able to back-patch it to v12 without too much trouble,
> fortunately. I'll commit that soon unless anyone else has feedback.
Committed, thanks!
I refrained from introducing INT64_HEX_FORMAT/UINT64_HEX_FORMAT in c.h
Tomas Vondra writes:
> 3) unnecessary ListCell in DataChecksumsWorkerMain() on line 1345,
>shadowing earlier variable
All the ListCell variables can be eliminated by using the foreach_ptr
and foreach_oid macros instead of plain foreach.
- ilmari
On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 12:02 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Geoghegan writes:
> > To be clear, I don't think that it's essential that we have equivalent
> > behavior in those cases where the patch applies its transformations. I
> > have no objections to committing the patch without any handling for
>
On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 12:02 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Geoghegan writes:
> > To be clear, I don't think that it's essential that we have equivalent
> > behavior in those cases where the patch applies its transformations. I
> > have no objections to committing the patch without any handling for
>
Thomas Munro writes:
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 12:11 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmm, I should think that if you break anything in tab-complete.in.c,
>> the breakage would propagate to tab-complete.c without difficulty.
>> Do you have an example of something that the preprocessor would mask?
> Fair poi
On Sun, Oct 6, 2024 at 11:17 PM Hunaid Sohail wrote:
>
> PQpass - no need
>
I would include this as presence/absence.
I concur on all of the rest.
>
> For PQparameterStatus, some parameters are already used.
> server_version and application_name were already discussed and removed in
> v12 and
On 2024/10/06 18:35, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 08:12:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
OK, if there's no objections let's push both remaining patches
to HEAD only.
Done as of f22e84df1dea and 430ce189fc45.
Commit 430ce189fc45 unexpectedly caused psql to report the error
"er
On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 1:39 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 08:16:00PM +0800, jian he wrote:
> > about v5 0001
> > select_with_parens:
> > '(' select_no_parens ')'{ $$ = $2; }
> > | '(' select_with_parens ')'{ $$ = $2; }
> >
On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 12:02 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Oy. I don't agree with that *at all*. An "optimization" that changes
> query semantics is going to be widely seen as a bug.
I don't believe that I said otherwise?
It's just rather unclear what query semantics really mean here, in
detail. At lea
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 10:32 AM Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> It doesn't make a huge difference in practice, because we'll still end
> the scan once the leaf level is reached. But it matters more when
> array keys are involved, where there might be more than one descent to
> the leaf level. Plus we mi
On Mon, 2024-10-07 at 10:17 +0300, Alena Rybakina wrote:
> > diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/perform.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/perform.sgml
> > index ff689b65245..db906841472 100644
> > --- a/doc/src/sgml/perform.sgml
> > +++ b/doc/src/sgml/perform.sgml
> > @@ -578,6 +578,28 @@ WHERE t1.unique1 < 100 AND t1.un
Peter Geoghegan writes:
> To be clear, I don't think that it's essential that we have equivalent
> behavior in those cases where the patch applies its transformations. I
> have no objections to committing the patch without any handling for
> that.
Oy. I don't agree with that *at all*. An "optim
Committed with the limit set to 512 bytes. We have plenty of time to
adjust this limit as needed before it takes effect in v18.
--
nathan
On Mon, 2024-10-07 at 11:14 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I accept that my commit created this problem and I'm
> certainly willing to be involved too if we need to sort out more
> things.
Thanks you. I think it is great that disabled nodes are now handled
better, so I appreciate the change as such.
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 11:14 AM Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I think a better approach would be to make the list of disabled indexes
> a GUC setting, which would then internally have an effect similar to
> enable_indexscan, meaning it would make the listed indexes unattractive
> to the planner.
>
>
On Sun, Sep 1, 2024 at 11:44 AM bigbro...@hotmail.com
wrote:
> I have reanalysed the code of function _bt_first. I notice that using a
> multi-attribute index
> if we can't identify the starting boundaries and the following attributes
> markded not required ,
> that means we need start at first
On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 11:28 AM Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2024-Oct-03, Robert Haas wrote:
> > One general thing to think about is that we really document very
> > little about EXPLAIN. That might not be good, but we should consider
> > whether it will look strange if we document a bunch of stuff
On 2024-Oct-03, Robert Haas wrote:
> One general thing to think about is that we really document very
> little about EXPLAIN. That might not be good, but we should consider
> whether it will look strange if we document a bunch of stuff about
> this and still don't talk about anything else.
I comp
On Sat, Oct 5, 2024 at 1:37 AM David Rowley wrote:
> Thanks for explaining your point of view. I've not shifted my opinion
> any, so I guess we just disagree. I feel a strong enough dislike for
> the current EXPLAIN output to feel it's worth working harder to have a
> better output.
>
> I won't pu
On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 2:40 PM Robert Haas wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 2:20 PM Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 2:00 PM Alexander Korotkov
> > wrote:
> > > Yes, transformAExprIn() does the work to coerce all the expressions in
> > > the right part to the same type. Simil
On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 10:37 PM David Rowley wrote:
> I'd encourage anyone else on the sidelines who has an opinion on how
> to display the disabled-ness of a plan node in EXPLAIN to speak up
> now, even if it's just a +1 to something someone has already written.
> It would be nice to see what mo
On Sat, Oct 5, 2024 at 3:35 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> BTW, getting off the question of EXPLAIN output for a moment,
> I don't understand why disable_cost is still a thing. The
> one remaining usage seems trivial to replace, as attached.
I believe I commented on that somewhere upthread, but maybe I me
Hi All,
Suggestions
==
When analyzing real-time data collected by PostgreSQL,
it can be difficult to tune the current PostgreSQL server for satisfactory
performance.
Therefore, we propose Vertical Clustered Indexing (VCI), an in-memory column
store function that holds data in a state su
Hi,
I did a quick review today. First a couple minor comments:
1) monitoring.sgml
typos: number of database -> number of databases
calcuated -> calculated
2) unnecessary newline in heapam.c (no other changes)
3) unnecessary ListCell in DataChecksumsWorkerMain() on line 1345,
shadowing e
On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 10:07:10AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 10:02:11AM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> Could you explain why you feel the existing support functions are
>> insufficient?
>
> Because it is not possible to outsource the scan of pg_wal/summaries/
> to a
Hi,
On 2024-10-05 20:51:50 +0100, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
> Socket version 2.028 (included in Perl 5.32) provides pack_sockaddr_un()
> on Windows, so that can be fixed by bumping the Perl version in
> https://github.com/anarazel/pg-vm-images/blob/main/packer/windows.pkr.hcl
> to something
assume v40 is the latest version.
in group_similar_or_args
we can add a bool variable so
boolmatched = false;
foreach(lc, orargs)
{
if (match_index_to_operand(nonConstExpr, colnum, index))
{
matches[i].indexnum = indexnum;
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 22:20:55 +0900
Yugo Nagata wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 15:16:52 +0900
> Yugo NAGATA wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 01 Oct 2024 10:33:50 +0900 (JST)
> > Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> >
> > > >> That's because non-breaking space (nbsp) is not encoded as 0xa0 in
> > > >> UTF-8. nbsp in UTF-8 is
On Thu, 03 Oct 2024 12:23:34 +0900 (JST)
Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > parameter in this case (it is an "optional" parameter, though). However,
> > when we refer to the stored catalog value, we should call it an option or
> > a property and calling it parameter is not suitable.
>
> Not sure. The store
Thanks for your review!
On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 4:27 PM jian he
wrote:
mentioning maxerror is a
bigint type
or explicitly mentioning the maximum allowed value of "maxerror" would
be great.
Added a description that it allows positive bigint.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 11:43 PM Fujii Masao
w
Glad to hear it. Thank you!
On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 2:50 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 03:59:08PM -0300, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> > Nice... LGTM!
>
> I have noticed that this was still in the CF. After fixing a couple
> of inconsistencies in the markups and the na
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 at 12:52, Shlok Kyal wrote:
>
> Hi Kuroda-san,
>
> Thanks for reviewing the patch.
> >
> > 1.
> > I feel the name of SnapBuildDistributeNewCatalogSnapshot() should be
> > updated because it
> > distributes two objects: catalog snapshot and invalidation messages. Do you
> > hav
On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 at 12:26, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
wrote:
>
> Dear Vignesh,
>
> > One key point to consider is that the lock on transaction objects will
> > be held for a longer duration when using streaming in parallel. This
> > occurs because the parallel apply worker initiates the transaction
> On 7 Oct 2024, at 09:47, Michael Paquier wrote:
> The commit fest 2024-09 should have ended one week ago, so I have been
> taking one step ahead and I have begun cleaning up things.
Thanks for doing this, much appreciated!
--
Daniel Gustafsson
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 01:26:49PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 01:56:34PM +, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> > No problem at all! (I re-explained because I'm not always 100% sure that my
> > explanations are crystal clear ;-) )
>
> We've discussed a bit this patch of
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 12:53:43PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 04:45:24AM +, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 04:07:58PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> >> As an additional benefit of this approach, the client can set a
> >> connection varia
On Saturday, October 5, 2024, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>
> Rebase needed after f22e84df1, so here's an update that rebases
> up to HEAD and adds the missing "static". No other changes.
>
> (Anybody want to review this? I'm getting tired of rebasing it,
> and we're missing out on the clang build time sa
> On 3 Oct 2024, at 23:13, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 11:15:02AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I have committed 0001 (the new option) and 0004 (the docs tweak). I think
>> there is consensus for the rest, too, but I'll leave it for a few more days
>> to think about. I
> On Sun, Oct 06, 2024 at 12:01:29PM GMT, Joe Conway wrote:
> On 10/6/24 11:36, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Based on the feedback in [1], here is my attempt at implementing system
> > views for versions reporting. It adds pg_system_versions for showing
> > things like core version, compile
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 05:04:18PM -0700, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> I've reviewed v10 patch and here are some comments:
Thanks for looking at it!
>
> +static void
> +ValidateAndRestoreSnapshotFile(XLogRecPtr lsn, SnapBuildOnDisk *ondisk,
> + const char *path)
On 2024-Oct-06, Tom Lane wrote:
> Soumyadeep Chakraborty writes:
> > Attached is a simple patch to directly use heap scan routines in
> > vac_update_datfrozenxid(), avoiding the multilayer overhead from the
> > sysscan infrastructure.
Though if there's anybody with a Postgres fork using catalog
Hi,
It’s been a long gap in the activity of this thread, and I apologize
for the delay. However, I have now returned and reviewed the other
threads [1],[2] that have made changes in this area. I would like to
share a summary of the discussion that took place among Robert,
Andres, Bharath, and Tom
Hey,
Le mer. 2 oct. 2024 à 11:12, Benoit Lobréau a
écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your imput ! I will fix the doc as proposed and do the split
> as soon as I have time.
>
>
I've done the split, but I didn't go any further than that.
Two patches attached:
* v5-0001 adds the metrics (same patch tha
Le lun. 7 oct. 2024 à 02:18, Michael Paquier a écrit :
> On Sun, Oct 06, 2024 at 03:32:02PM +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> > I'm not sure I follow. That would mean that every time a query is
> executed,
> > it always gets the same amount of workers. Which is not guaranteed to be
> > true.
> >
Hi all,
The commit fest 2024-09 should have ended one week ago, so I have been
taking one step ahead and I have begun cleaning up things. As of now,
there is still a total of 113 patches marked as "Needs Review", and I
hope that my non-auto-vacuuming will be over tomorrow.
If you are an author o
On 03.10.2024 23:10, Laurenz Albe wrote:
On Thu, 2024-10-03 at 14:24 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 1:35 PM Alena Rybakina wrote:
I prepared a patch that includes the information we can add.
One general thing to think about is that we really document very
little about EXPLAI
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 02:56:37PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> It doesn't appear to me that this got committed. On the procedural
> question, I would personally treat it as a non-back-patchable bug fix
> i.e. master-only but without regard to feature freeze. However, I can
> see arguments for eithe
93 matches
Mail list logo
