Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> writes: > To be clear, I don't think that it's essential that we have equivalent > behavior in those cases where the patch applies its transformations. I > have no objections to committing the patch without any handling for > that.
Oy. I don't agree with that *at all*. An "optimization" that changes
query semantics is going to be widely seen as a bug.
regards, tom lane
