On Sun, Oct 6, 2024 at 11:17 PM Hunaid Sohail <hunaidp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > PQpass - no need > I would include this as presence/absence. I concur on all of the rest. > > For PQparameterStatus, some parameters are already used. > server_version and application_name were already discussed and removed in > v12 and v29 respectively. Do we need other parameters? > Ok, I'll need to go read the reasoning for why they are deemed unneeded and form an opinion one way or the other. > >> Within that framework having \conninfo[+[CSE][…]] be the command - >> printing out only the table specified would be the behavior (specifying no >> suffix letters prints all three) - would be an option. >> > > 3 separate tables without suffix? > Yes, the tables need headers specific to their categories. I do like the idea of having 4 though, placing settings into their own. Premised on having all or most of the available parameters being on the table. If it only ends up being a few of them then keeping those in the status table makes sense. David J. >
