not sure this is the only problem.
Could anyone have suggestions or tips for the postgres configuration and
the problem we're encountering?
The postgresql version is 7.4.8 on a Dual Xeon with 4Gb of Ram.
Apache frontends are Apache 1.3.33 with PHP 4.3.11.
Thank you in
that error but I obtain
that error only after two/three hours of testing.
Thank you for your help,
Denis
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
er disk on another raid container.
I'll let go the test for all the night and tomorrow I'll let you know
the results...
Thank you for your help,
Denis
Jeff Trout wrote:
On Jul 27, 2005, at 4:22 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Already checked.
We set a machine with only pg_pool insta
r problems that I must to check. I think they are
caused by my application.
As soon as I have some results, I'll let you know.
Thank you,
Denis
Jeff Trout wrote:
On Jul 27, 2005, at 10:46 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm now testing with pg_pool installed on each apache fr
With the last test I made, the database is swapping but in a very slow
way... 100K every 10 minutes and that seems to not be a problem... in
the sense that the server doesn't slow down...
Today I'll make other tests and let you know.
Thank you,
Denis
Scott Marlowe wrote:
On We
Ok, I figured out how to get the archiver going again. This is what I have
in the postgresql.conf file.
archive_command = 'yblogger %p wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In my development system the file system where $PGDATA resides filled up.
cp: writing
`/usr/local/pgsql/archlog/ybcdr
integer of 30 digits:
Text Field
30 bytes + sizeof(text data structure)
Composite type
8 bytes + sizeof(composite data structure)
What of the two data structures (text or composite) will use more disk
space?
Thank you,
--
Doct. Eng. Denis Gasparin
---
Edistar srl
00.000 of records => 65.159.168 bytes
numeric: 1.000.000 of records => 74.895.702 bytes
text: 1.000.000 of records => 77.340.672 bytes
The "text" table is only 16% larger than mycode one (I was expecting 100%!).
Any idea?
Thank you,
Denis
Douglas McNaught wrote:
Denis Gaspari
If i compile the -march=i586 the regression test reports no problems.
Any tips?
Thank you,
Doct. Eng. Denis Gasparin
---
Edistar Srl
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an
You can try to use this latest PostgreSQL ODBC driver with VS Express. Here
is the driver https://www.devart.com/odbc/postgresql/
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
o get rid of the temporary
> tables.
>
RESET SESSION command is available only in 8.2 branch, isn't it?
I tried to issue the command in a 8.1 server and the answer was: ERROR:
unrecognized configuration parameter "session"
Is there available a patch for the 8.1 version of postgresql?
Thank you,
Denis
and alive...
Moreover this does not happen with other filesystems...
Any idea?
We're running 8.1.9 on Linux Ubuntu with kernel 2.6.17-11 and xfs progs
2.8.10-1
Thank you in advance for your help,
Denis
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Hav
Setting PGHOST solved the problem!
It was not clear to me that pg_ctl is actually a client and it doesn't
read the configuration from postgresql.conf
Thank you,
Denis
Tom Lane ha scritto:
> Denis Gasparin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> We configured the u
1 and OS is linux with kernel 2.6.
The server will be connected to the SAN using a 4Gb fibre channel link.
Thank you in advance,
Denis
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index
because there aren't autovacuum info columns on
pg_stat_all_tables (as there are for 8.2.x).
Also I'm asking this because the size of the pg_clog is >200M and I am
worried about possible transaction ID wraparound failures...
Thank you,
Denis
Tom Lane ha scritto:
> Karl Denninger <
rocessing because there aren't autovacuum info columns on
pg_stat_all_tables (as there are for 8.2.x).
Also I'm asking this because the size of the pg_clog is >200M and I am
worried about possible transaction ID wraparound failures
Thank you,
Denis
---(end of
rmal log messages (instead of
debug2)?
I think it could be useful because in this way you can also know what
tables are used more often then other...
If i'm not wrong, the old autovacuum process in 7.4 and 8.0 did that...
Denis
ogram.
This program issues delete commands to the pg_largeobject table in order
to erase the rows of the los no more referenced.
Autovacuum is up and running... but now i'm thinking it doesn't examine
system tables such as pg_largeobject...
Am I wrong?
Thank you,
Denis
---
x_fsm_pages is 2 (the default value).
I suspect I must change this to a higher value... but how high should
this value be?
Thank you in advance,
Denis
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
milar solution on postgres?
What to do you think about this?
Thank you,
Denis
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
tc..
Ok. I knew that. I made the question because it seems that, for example,
Oracle in release 11g is moving to a similar solution in order to solve
connection pooling problems.
For example look at the following link:
http://pbarut.blogspot.com/2007/08/oracle-11g-drcp-databa
Hello. I had a strange issue with postgresql 9.3 server. Load on server
rapidly increased, queries which took about 4ms were executed for 100ms and
creation a foreign key on empty table blocked all queries to server. After
server restart everithing became fine again, the same foreign key was
create
ALYZE the tables the original query will run in a few ms
instead of 15 seconds, it actually uses the same query plan that swapping the
tables creates.
So it runs the index scan on inner_tab_1 first.
It's a bit surprising that with ANALYSE it picks a plan that is so much worse.
Any one able
instead returns only the value with not null values.
I tested the example also in PostgreSQL 8.1 and it works correctly (two
records).
So the question is: what has changed from 8.1 to 8.2?
Thank you in advance for your help,
Denis
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general
...
Does someone has a better suggestion ?
Thanks a lot in advance !
Denis
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Hello everyone,
Denis BUCHER a écrit :
> I have a system that must each day import lots of data from another one.
> Our system is in postgresql and we connect to the other via ODBC.
>
> Currently we do something like :
>
> SELECT ... FROM ODBC source
> foreach row {
>
Hello everyone,
I need to execute an external script from Postgresql, it could be in
perl, in bash/shell, in whatever...
Any help would be appreciated ! I just need a very simple example if
possible...
I already searched on the web but found nothing...
Denis
--
Sent via pgsql-general
Hello,
Denis BUCHER a écrit :
> I need to execute an external script from Postgresql, it could be in
> perl, in bash/shell, in whatever...
>
> Any help would be appreciated ! I just need a very simple example if
> possible...
>
> I already searched on the web but found no
unction that makes everything
transparent to use the "local" postgresql customer database :
SELECT * FROM hds_findcustomer(10234);
This function :
1. Returns the customer if present in postgres
2. Otherwise executes the external script (check and update)
3. And returns the customer if updated
Denis
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
thout it but, it's a little strange not to be able to list
the objects present in the database...
Denis
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
; count
>> ---
>> 86703
>> (1 ligne)
>
> My table is there and I can access it !!!
>
> Any hint or help would be greatly appreciated !
>
> I can do without it, but it's a little strange not to be able to list
> the objects present in the database...
Denis
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
|
hasrules | hastriggers
-+---++++--+-
bw_import_as400 | clients | postgres || f | f
| f
rma | clients | postgres || t | f
| f
(2 lignes)
Thanks a lot for your help :-)
Denis
Wojtek a écrit
taire
-+-+---+--
import | customers | table | postgres
rma | customers | table | postgres
(2 lignes)
I really don't understand what's happening here ?
Denis
> That's what I found, do you see something inside that looks interesting ?
>
> # SELECT * FROM pg_c
gt;> rma | customers | table | postgres
>> (2 lignes)
>>
>>
> you have two tables 'customers', one in schema 'import', the other one
> in schema 'rma'
Yes that's correct
> I assume you want to keep two copies of this table, right?
Yes, in fact they are two different tables...
Denis
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Hello,
> # VACUUM pg_catalog.pg_class;
> VACUUM
> # VACUUM pg_catalog.pg_tables;
> ATTENTION: ignore « pg_tables » --- could not execute VACUUM on indexes,
> views or system tables
> VACUUM
Denis
Bill Bartlett a écrit :
> Possible xid rollover problem? (We saw beh
Hello Tom,
Tom Lane a écrit :
> Denis BUCHER writes:
>> I really don't understand what's happening here ?
>
> "\dt customers" will show you the customers table that's visible
> according to your search_path setting. Apparently schema "import
h_path configuration.
>
> I suppose you have something like 'rma, import, ...' for search_path, so it
> only displays rma.customers and not impor.customers.
Yes that's correct. Therefore my "problem" is the "normal" behavior of
\dt. But "norm
Tom Lane a écrit :
> Denis BUCHER writes:
>> Yes that's correct. Therefore my "problem" is the "normal" behavior of
>> \dt. But "normal" means "expected". But I don't find it very
>> secure/handy, because you expect to see a
:
ALTER TABLE mytable ADD COLUMN field integer;
ERROR: must be the owner of the mytable relation
Therefore, how to give right to some user on tables structure ???
Thanks a lot for any help, this problem is always giving us lots of
difficulties...
Denis
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list
mytable_owner;
> GRANT mytable_owner TO myself, mycolleague, ... ;
>
> I highly recommend reading the GRANT command reference page.
>
> regards, tom lane
That's great, in fact this is the right solution, I didn't think about
it... Thanks a lot...
Den
Hello,
Tom Lane a écrit :
> "Raymond O'Donnell" writes:
>> On 12/09/2009 16:44, Denis BUCHER wrote:
>>> ERROR: must be the owner of the mytable relation
>
>> The clue is in the error message :-) GRANTing ALL doesn't make them
>> the own
Denis BUCHER a écrit :
> Tom Lane a écrit :
>> "Raymond O'Donnell" writes:
>>> On 12/09/2009 16:44, Denis BUCHER wrote:
>>>> ERROR: must be the owner of the mytable relation
>>> The clue is in the error message :-) GRANTing ALL doesn
how postgres
can clean himself again...
Thanks a lot for any advice...
Denis
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Problem:
It is necessary to synchronize the "users" table with an
external storage of passwords (krb5)
I made a trigger:
CREATE TRIGGER "10_krb5"
AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE OR DELETE
ON users
FOR EACH ROW
EXECUTE PROCEDURE user2krb5_python();
Everything works, except that when you d
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:29:49 -0600
Scott Marlowe wrote:
> 2009/10/30 Denis Feklushkin :
> >
> > Problem:
> > It is necessary to synchronize the "users" table with an
> > external storage of passwords (krb5)
> >
> > I made a trigger:
> >
>
ould never
> trust the data without comparing it to a backup.
>
> So - make sure your last backup restores OK. Check your hardware works.
> Make sure you have fsync turned on and your disks are syncing when they
> say they do.
Yes finally we started back from the last backup (a script
in advance
Denis Gasparin
---
Edistar SRL
I have a table with an xml type column, and while I can make regex
queries like this successfully:
=> select id from form_d where 'kumar' ~* any(
CAST(xpath('//PersonsList/PersonName/LastName/text()', data) as TEXT[]) );
id
--
97e1541b-27f
Hi David,
On 12/20/2012 08:48 PM, David Johnston wrote:
-Original Message-
From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-
ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Denis Papathanasiou
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 7:56 PM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: [GENERAL
On 12/21/2012 10:35 AM, David Johnston wrote:
If you look at the four examples which follow the posix match table in the
docs (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/functions-
matching.html#FUNCTIONS-POSIX-TABLE),
some of them work from the left side, e.g.:
'abc' ~ '(b|d)' true
In my orig
urned value=3) but this is not the case...
Is it the correct behaviour?
Thank you,
Denis
y solution that worked in that case was :
* /usr/bin/pg_ctl stop
Have a nice day !
Denis
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
After reading the documentation on Full Text Search here
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/textsearch-tables.html I
created the following table and index:
CREATE TABLE item (
pk uuid primary key,
...
[more columns here]
...
searchable_text text not null
);
CREATE INDEX item_
After reading the documentation on Full Text Search here
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/textsearch-tables.html I
created the following table and index:
CREATE TABLE item (
pk uuid primary key,
...
[more columns here]
...
searchable_text text not null
);
CREATE INDEX ite
Same version of postgresql (backup and restore) ?
If not, some small adaptations are always necessary...
What do you get as errors or warnings ?
Denis
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
nging any line of data or code in sql !
Incredible, isn't it ?
Denis
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
As a follow-up to my question from this past Saturday
(http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2010-08/msg00624.php), I
experimented with adding two types of indices to the same text column:
CREATE INDEX item_eng_searchable_text_idx ON item USING
gin(to_tsvector('english', searchable_text));
Not per se, but maybe looking at the actual outputs of the two function
calls would be enlightening. I suspect you'll find that the search
conditions you are getting are not equivalent.
Strictly speaking they're not, b/c the plainto_tsquery() is chaining
several tokens together.
However, a
we need examples of your explain analyze. I don't want to waste my time
reading theoretical reasoning :)
Here's an actual 'explain analyze' example:
alerts=> CREATE INDEX node_val_tsv_idx ON node USING
gin(to_tsvector('english', val));
CREATE INDEX
alerts=> explain analyze select item_pk fr
That index doesn't match the query, so it can't be used. Try
select item_pk from node where
tag='primaryIssuer.entityType' and
to_tsvector('english', val) @@ plainto_tsquery('Limited Partnership');
Tom and Oleg: thank you for clarifying this.
I see where I made the mistake in applying the e
l problems of any kind. Any idea?
Thank you in advance,
Denis Gasparin
Edistar SRL
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Tom Lane ha scritto:
> Denis Gasparin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I'm evaluating to issue the drop_caches kernel command (echo 3 >
>> /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches) in order to free unused pagecache, directory
>> entries and inodes.
>>
>
&
IMHO the client application is already confused and it's in Prod.
Shouldn't he perhaps terminate/abort the IDLE connections in Prod and
work on correcting the problem so it doesn't occur in Dev/Test??
On 11/24/09, Matthew Wakeling wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Lorenzo Allegrucci wrote:
>> Anyway
Bouncing the app will roll back the transactions. If there were any
pending updates/inserts, wouldn't he be able to see them in one of the
system tables...
On 11/24/09, Matthew Wakeling wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Denis Lussier wrote:
>> IMHO the client application is alread
fails, and there is a very strange error !
There is a "E" before the street field !
This is an extract of the dump :
'ST311PHANIE ROBERT', NULL, E'RTE DES TATTES D\\''OIE 5',
311 is shown instead of accent
Does someone knows what could be this problem ?
D
reat, then it's not a bug but "String Constants with C-Style
Escapes" !
But this seems to be a 8.4 feature not supported by 7.4.6 ?
If you have an idea on how to have 7.4.6 accept it...
Thanks a lot for your help :-)
Denis
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
I m new to PostgreSQL so please tell me the drawbacks of is this solution
Your Table 3 should not be a table it should be a array.
CREATE TABLE table3
(
ori_des int[][]
);
for origin area_n and destination area_m if count is k, then ori_des[n][m] = k.
--- On Tue, 19/5/09, Carso
Title: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase
It may be hard for u to
resist if those wacky guyz from Redwood offered eight figures (and I'm not
counting the ones to the right of the decimal point).
--Luss
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
behalf of Marc G. FournierSent: Fri 10/
Hi All,
EnterpriseDB recently sent out email advertising new support offerings.
Unfortunately, the email was incorrectly sent to some people who should
not have received it. We apologize for the error, and are taking steps
to avoid such mistakes in the future.
-Denis Lussier
CTO & Founder
Korry Douglas has an EDB sponsored project called pg_migrator on
pgfoundry. I believe it works for upgrading from 8.1 to 8.2 except
for tables that use the ip address datatype. It works by just
replacing the 8.1 system catalogs with the 8.2 system catalogs. I
believe the on-disk images for 8.1
Oracle provides a free tool for converting TSQL into PL/SQL.
You can then use the PL/SQL on an EnterpriseDB database, if this doesn't
work for ya... PL/SQL is quite a bit closer to PLpgSQL than TSQL is so
you'll be well on your way.
--Luss
http://www.enterprisedb.com
On 2/9/07, johnf <[EMAIL
Pavel is doing nice work on Orafce & the EnterpriseDB PG Community Fund is
now sponsoring him to do more.
On 2/10/07, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Denis Lussier wrote:
> Oracle provides a free tool for converting TSQL into PL/SQL.
>
> You can then u
-
test12345678
I expected:
NOTICE: (test12345678)
test_text
------
test12345678
Where is the error?
Thank you,
Denis
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org/
Peter Eisentraut ha scritto:
> Am Montag, 12. März 2007 12:47 schrieb Denis Gasparin:
>
>> I wrote a simple c stored procedure that accepts only one text parameter
>> that i want to convert to a c string.
>> The problem is that i obtain the C string correctly but with s
n why Postgresql is using seqscan when it should not?
I tryed also to vacuum analyze and reindex all the database but it
didn't change anything.
Thank you in advance,
Denis
Database and query infos
The database is made of four tables. Here it is an extract of the
definitition:
table
sql_stmt_b7a713b0 AS select * from test where field=$1
EXECUTE [PREPARE: select * from test where field=$1]
Speaking about postgresql performance...
would not it be more efficient executing directly the query in the first
case ($db->query) than
preparing a statement without parameters and then
How can I calculate the number of second in some interval? Neither
the secods part, nor the seconds after midnight... Just the full
quantity of the seconds. I haven't find any function.
Thanks in advance.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: don't for
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 04:08:53AM +0600, Denis Zaitsev wrote:
> How can I calculate the number of second in some interval? Neither
> the secods part, nor the seconds after midnight... Just the full
> quantity of the seconds. I haven't find any function.
>
> Thanks in adv
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 06:30:24PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Denis Zaitsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > How can I calculate the number of second in some interval? Neither
> > the secods part, nor the seconds after midnight... Just the full
> > quantity of the s
indexed numeric and composite?
Thank you,
Denis
Douglas McNaught wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I need to store very large integers (more of 30 digits).
Er,
What's wrong with the NUMERIC type? That can go up to hundreds of
digits.
-Doug
---(e
possible if this is a problem or not...
Thank you,
Denis
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
Hi Richard.
Thank you for your reply. I rewrote the store procedure to accept
integer instead of smallint.
What i don't understand is why the casting is working in 7.2.3. What
has been changed from that?
Thank you,
--
Doct. Eng. Denis Gasparin: [EMAIL PROT
g up the issue at the right time, however my
main focus at that time was to bring the production system back to normal..
Regards
- --
Denis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-nr2 (Windows XP)
iD8DBQFAnh+gvsCA6eRGOOARAlivAKCl8aIuii8GeSFLetWn+exBVXnptwCeKMUr
wjAEgS7gP1LQeS/xZdiC03
/tsearch/V2/regprocedure_7.4.patch.gz
Best Regards
- --
Denis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-nr2 (Windows XP)
iD8DBQFAniUSvsCA6eRGOOARAtJpAKCt4Wcrea3bIxu8fXw/5ZNFACdohwCfZPDf
UuCk1dXLx8SCS4/qMniC2z4=
=871m
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
---(end of broadcast
t maybe someone else knows ?
Regards
- --
Denis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-nr2 (Windows XP)
iD8DBQFAnPzivsCA6eRGOOARAl1OAKC0zcgN409n7ylgyHV61J9/o4LsBgCgqEpJ
yT24Y03fQItzhbRlxHyUg8s=
=YBoz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
---(end of broadcast)
updates it is not an issue too (I mean if do not update more than
25% of DB each day).
Actually for anyone listening for such advices I would recommend to create a
test installation, and stress test it before go to production. Interbase has
its own problems.
--
Sincerely Yours,
Denis Perchi
new_table WHERE col1 = 'value'.
The problem is that when i do an explain this is the query plan:
Seq Scan on new_table (cost=0.00..1116.38 rows=500 width=44)
Can anyone explain me why it doesn't use the index I have created?
Thank you for you help
It contains 5 records. I have to do vacuum analyze on the table after
having issued the "CREATE INDEX" to create the index?
Please, let me know...
Regards,
Denis
At 19.03 23/08/01, Doug McNaught wrote:
>Denis Gasparin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi to all
27;ll check what the statistics say about the SELECT on the primary
key query.
When i've done, i'll tell you...
Denis
At 19.03 23/08/01, Doug McNaught wrote:
>Denis Gasparin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi to all!
> > I have created a table using the
Now i have tried creating the table and the inserting...
The results are the same...
Is it possible that the query planner thinks that is best a sequential scan
when an index on the table is present?
I'm using postgresql 7.1.3 on a redhat 7.1.
Thanks for the help,
Denis
P.S.: I'm so
sql 7.1.2 on RedHat 7.1. All the regress tests has been
completed correctely during installation.
Please, let me know as soon as possible...
Regards,
Eng. Denis Gasparin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Programmer & System Administrator - Edistar srl
solved in
some future release
At this point, is it safe to use BIGINT datatype and indexes on those fields?
Thank for your answers,
Regards,
Eng. Denis Gasparin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Programmer & System Administrator - Edistar srl
At 14.57 24/08/01, Denis Gasp
g to your experience? Is there others
different solutions?
Thank for the tips...
Regards,
Eng. Denis Gasparin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Programmer & System Administrator - Edistar srl
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
On Wednesday 19 September 2001 11:25, Tom Lane wrote:
> Denis Perchine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > BTW, using begin; lock table; create index;drop index;commit; is not
> > working,
>
> ??
>
> regression=# create table foo (f1 text);
> CREATE
> re
Hello !
Ok...
I wrote a small text against that virus just in case you need it !
http://www.horus.ch/virus180901.txt
A bientôt !
Denis Bucher
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
...
All my apologies and happy postgresql'ing :-)
Denis
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
On Wednesday 19 September 2001 11:25, Tom Lane wrote:
> Denis Perchine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > BTW, using begin; lock table; create index;drop index;commit; is not
> > working,
>
> ??
>
> regression=# create table foo (f1 text);
> CREATE
> re
e link...
In conclusion, the new VACUUM command as described above will be include in
the 7.2 version of Postgresql?
Denis Gasparin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Programmer & System Administrator - Edistar srl
---(end of broadcast)--
e link...
In conclusion, the new VACUUM command as described above will be include in
the 7.2 version of Postgresql?
Denis Gasparin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Programmer & System Administrator - Edistar srl
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
Ok, little language qui pro quo...
I'm sorry for the error...
Denis
At 15/10/01 17.00, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 10:40:17AM +0200, Denis Gasparin wrote:
> > >
> > >It's long since done.
> >
> > ==>> This means that it wil
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo