Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2

On 05/18/2017 08:49 AM, Martin Goodson wrote: On 18/05/2017 15:20, Adrian Klaver wrote: If I remove that link then I can compile. Have no idea why. Hi! OP here, and here's the feedback on what I'm getting after unlinking as suggested yesterday: I tried removing/unlinking as suggested and,

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2

On 18/05/2017 15:20, Adrian Klaver wrote: If I remove that link then I can compile. Have no idea why. Hi! OP here, and here's the feedback on what I'm getting after unlinking as suggested yesterday: I tried removing/unlinking as suggested and, just like Adrian, it worked OK for me! :) T

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2

On 05/17/2017 02:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Adrian Klaver writes: >> I could build repmgr against Postgres source and on Ubuntu install of >> EDB Postgres. The issue seems to be a combination of RH and EDB Postgres >> installation. To me it looks like ld is finding >> /lib64/libldap_r-2.4.so.2 libra

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2

Adrian Klaver writes: > I could build repmgr against Postgres source and on Ubuntu install of > EDB Postgres. The issue seems to be a combination of RH and EDB Postgres > installation. To me it looks like ld is finding > /lib64/libldap_r-2.4.so.2 library before the /opt/PostgreSQL/9.6/lib/ > o

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2

On 05/17/2017 01:28 PM, Martin Goodson wrote: On 17/05/2017 20:11, Adrian Klaver wrote: I thought you where working on VM you had access/rights to. That is not the case? I have sudo access on the redhat box we're working on so technically I could do this, yup. But whilst our Unix team are

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2

On 17/05/2017 20:11, Adrian Klaver wrote: I thought you where working on VM you had access/rights to. That is not the case? I have sudo access on the redhat box we're working on so technically I could do this, yup. But whilst our Unix team are happy for us to do whatever the heck we like

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2

On 05/17/2017 12:01 PM, Martin Goodson wrote: On 17/05/2017 17:19, Adrian Klaver wrote: Spun up a RH 7.3 instance and tried the compile and got the same error. Good to know it's reproducible, and not just me :) I'll have a word with our UNIX team about unlinking this (and relinking afterwa

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2

On 17/05/2017 17:19, Adrian Klaver wrote: Spun up a RH 7.3 instance and tried the compile and got the same error. Good to know it's reproducible, and not just me :) To fix, find the checking library in /lib64/libldap_r-2.4.so.2. [root@localhost repmgr-2.0]# cd /lib64/ [root@localhost lib64]#

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2

On 17/05/2017 16:15, Adrian Klaver wrote: On 05/17/2017 07:26 AM, Martin Goodson wrote: On 16/05/2017 18:46, Adrian Klaver wrote: Per Tom's suggestion try ldd /db_demo/app/postgres/9.6.2-3/lib/libldap_r-2.4.so.2 Hello. Apologies for the delay in replying - medical appointment this morning

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2

On 05/17/2017 07:26 AM, Martin Goodson wrote: On 16/05/2017 18:46, Adrian Klaver wrote: Per Tom's suggestion try ldd /db_demo/app/postgres/9.6.2-3/lib/libldap_r-2.4.so.2 Hello. Apologies for the delay in replying - medical appointment this morning :) Anyway, executed that command as suggeste

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2

On 05/17/2017 07:26 AM, Martin Goodson wrote: On 16/05/2017 18:46, Adrian Klaver wrote: Per Tom's suggestion try ldd /db_demo/app/postgres/9.6.2-3/lib/libldap_r-2.4.so.2 Hello. Apologies for the delay in replying - medical appointment this morning :) Anyway, executed that command as suggeste

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2

On 16/05/2017 18:46, Adrian Klaver wrote: Per Tom's suggestion try ldd /db_demo/app/postgres/9.6.2-3/lib/libldap_r-2.4.so.2 Hello. Apologies for the delay in replying - medical appointment this morning :) Anyway, executed that command as suggested and this is the output I got. pginst@testd

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2

On 05/16/2017 08:39 AM, Martin Goodson wrote: On 16/05/2017 15:58, Adrian Klaver wrote: For completeness what does: ls -al /usr/lib64/libssl.so show? (Trimming things down a bit to keep things a little bit more readable, now we've got the package dependencies issue sorted. Hopefully. Hop

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2

Martin Goodson writes: /bin/ld: warning: libssl.so.1.0.0, needed by /db_demo/app/postgres/9.6.2-3/lib/libpq.so, may conflict with libssl.so.10 /lib64/libldap_r-2.4.so.2: undefined reference to `ber_sockbuf_io_udp' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > Drat. Didn'

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2

On 16/05/2017 16:39, Martin Goodson wrote: On 16/05/2017 15:58, Adrian Klaver wrote: /bin/ld: warning: libssl.so.1.0.0, needed by /db_demo/app/postgres/9.6.2-3/lib/libpq.so, may conflict with libssl.so.10 /lib64/libldap_r-2.4.so.2: undefined reference to `ber_sockbuf_io_udp' collect2: error: l

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2

On 16/05/2017 15:58, Adrian Klaver wrote: For completeness what does: ls -al /usr/lib64/libssl.so show? (Trimming things down a bit to keep things a little bit more readable, now we've got the package dependencies issue sorted. Hopefully. Hope that's OK?) I can see the following: $ ls -l

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2

On 05/16/2017 07:22 AM, Martin Goodson wrote: On 16/05/2017 14:42, Adrian Klaver wrote: On 05/16/2017 04:36 AM, Martin Goodson wrote: On 15/05/2017 00:17, Martin Goodson wrote: That list would be: systemd libxslt-devel pam-devel openssl-devel readline-devel libmemcached-devel libicu-devel

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2

On 16/05/2017 14:42, Adrian Klaver wrote: On 05/16/2017 04:36 AM, Martin Goodson wrote: On 15/05/2017 00:17, Martin Goodson wrote: Tomorrow I'll have to see about getting that set-up on an RHEL 7 box :) Thank you so much, everybody, for your help! It's been invaluable! Regards, Martin.

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2

On 05/16/2017 04:36 AM, Martin Goodson wrote: On 15/05/2017 00:17, Martin Goodson wrote: Tomorrow I'll have to see about getting that set-up on an RHEL 7 box :) Thank you so much, everybody, for your help! It's been invaluable! Regards, Martin. *Sigh*. And things were going so well. With

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2

On 15/05/2017 00:17, Martin Goodson wrote: Tomorrow I'll have to see about getting that set-up on an RHEL 7 box :) Thank you so much, everybody, for your help! It's been invaluable! Regards, Martin. *Sigh*. And things were going so well. With Adrian and Devrim's help I was able to get re

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 2 - compilation issues.

On 14/05/2017 21:49, Adrian Klaver wrote: I spun up an Ubuntu 16.04 instance and: RHUbuntu build-essential libxslt-devellibxslt1-dev(this also pulled in libicu-dev) pam-devel libpam0g-dev openssl-devel libssl-dev readline-devel

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 2 - compilation issues.

On 5/14/2017 2:20 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: A bit outdated but: http://raghavt.blogspot.com/2015/01/configuring-automatic-failover-using.html the advice on that page to unlink a library in /lib64 on an RPM managed system makes me very leery of the rest of the article. -- john r pierce,

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 2 - compilation issues.

On 05/14/2017 02:38 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote: On 05/14/2017 02:20 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: On 05/14/2017 01:42 PM, Martin Goodson wrote: Do you happen to know if there's any documentation anywhere on installing/configuring repmgr with Enterprise DB PostgreSQL (community, *not* Advanced)? A b

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 2 - compilation issues.

On 05/14/2017 02:20 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On 05/14/2017 01:42 PM, Martin Goodson wrote: >> Do you happen to know if there's any documentation anywhere on >> installing/configuring repmgr with Enterprise DB PostgreSQL (community, >> *not* Advanced)? > > A bit outdated but: > > http://raghav

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 2 - compilation issues.

On 05/14/2017 01:42 PM, Martin Goodson wrote: Do you happen to know if there's any documentation anywhere on installing/configuring repmgr with Enterprise DB PostgreSQL (community, *not* Advanced)? A bit outdated but: http://raghavt.blogspot.com/2015/01/configuring-automatic-failover-using.htm

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 2 - compilation issues.

On 05/14/2017 11:22 AM, Devrim Gündüz wrote: Hi Josh, On Fri, 2017-05-12 at 08:18 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: This is your problem. As Adrian already mentioned, you should be running the PGDG apt repos. I don't think this is a productive answer. Really? The OP has had a thread of 28 mes

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 2 - compilation issues.

On 05/14/2017 11:26 AM, Devrim Gündüz wrote: Hi Martin, On Fri, 2017-05-12 at 16:13 +0100, Martin Goodson wrote: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lselinux /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lssl /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lcrypto /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgssapi_krb5 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz collect2: err

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 2 - compilation issues.

On 14/05/2017 19:26, Devrim Gündüz wrote: Hi Martin, On Fri, 2017-05-12 at 16:13 +0100, Martin Goodson wrote: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lselinux /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lssl /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lcrypto /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgssapi_krb5 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz collect2: error:

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 3 - libraries resolved, still can't compile :(

On 05/14/2017 01:21 PM, Devrim Gündüz wrote: Hi, On Sun, 2017-05-14 at 12:59 -0700, Adrian Klaver wrote: We don't support OpenSuSE, that might be the reason. Who is we EnterpriseDB. and what don't you support? OpenSuSE, as I wrote in the previous email. You might need to rewrite this

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 3 - libraries resolved, still can't compile :(

Hi, On Sun, 2017-05-14 at 12:59 -0700, Adrian Klaver wrote: > > We don't support OpenSuSE, that might be the reason. > > Who is we EnterpriseDB. > and what don't you support? OpenSuSE, as I wrote in the previous email. Regards, -- Devrim Gündüz EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com Pos

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 3 - libraries resolved, still can't compile :(

On 05/14/2017 11:31 AM, Devrim Gündüz wrote: Hi Adrian, On Sun, 2017-05-14 at 09:00 -0700, Adrian Klaver wrote: I understand. I just installed EDB Postgres 9.6.3 on my openSUSE Leap 42.2 machine and tried to compile repmgr against it. No joy. We don't support OpenSuSE, that might be the rea

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 2 - compilation issues.

On 05/14/2017 11:29 AM, Devrim Gündüz wrote: Hi again Martin, On Fri, 2017-05-12 at 16:13 +0100, Martin Goodson wrote: testdb@repm:/postgresql/software/repmgr/repmgr-3.3.1$ sudo make USE_PGXS=1 install BTW, please patch these two files first and change PG_CONFIG = pg_config to PG_CONFIG= /p

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 3 - libraries resolved, still can't compile :(

Hi Adrian, On Sun, 2017-05-14 at 09:00 -0700, Adrian Klaver wrote: > I understand. I just installed  EDB Postgres 9.6.3 on my openSUSE Leap  > 42.2 machine and tried to compile repmgr against it. No joy. We don't support OpenSuSE, that might be the reason. Regards, -- Devrim Gündüz Enterprise

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 2 - compilation issues.

Hi again Martin, On Fri, 2017-05-12 at 16:13 +0100, Martin Goodson wrote: > testdb@repm:/postgresql/software/repmgr/repmgr-3.3.1$ sudo make  > USE_PGXS=1 install BTW, please patch these two files first and change PG_CONFIG = pg_config  to PG_CONFIG= /postgresql/software/pg/9.6.2/bin/config (ap

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 2 - compilation issues.

Hi Martin, On Fri, 2017-05-12 at 16:13 +0100, Martin Goodson wrote: > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lselinux > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lssl > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lcrypto > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgssapi_krb5 > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > Make

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 2 - compilation issues.

Hi Josh, On Fri, 2017-05-12 at 08:18 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > This is your problem. As Adrian already mentioned, you should be running  > the PGDG apt repos. I don't think this is a productive answer. I could just compile repmgr on my CentOS 7 box against EPAS 9.6. Someone with a few pack

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 3 - libraries resolved, still can't compile :(

On 05/14/2017 02:43 AM, Martin Goodson wrote: On 12/05/2017 18:57, Adrian Klaver wrote: On 05/12/2017 09:19 AM, Martin Goodson wrote: On 12/05/2017 16:59, Adrian Klaver wrote: To make things easier I would remove the deb installed Postgres, it just adds complexity to the situation without

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 3 - libraries resolved, still can't compile :(

On 05/14/2017 02:43 AM, Martin Goodson wrote: On 12/05/2017 18:57, Adrian Klaver wrote: On 05/12/2017 09:19 AM, Martin Goodson wrote: On 12/05/2017 16:59, Adrian Klaver wrote: Progress of a sort. Kinda. On a clean Ubuntu server 17.04 virtual machine I've installed PostgreSQL 9.6 using

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 3 - libraries resolved, still can't compile :(

On 12/05/2017 18:57, Adrian Klaver wrote: On 05/12/2017 09:19 AM, Martin Goodson wrote: On 12/05/2017 16:59, Adrian Klaver wrote: Configuring Automatic failover using Replication Manager 2.0 on PostgreSQL 9.3.5 http://raghavt.blogspot.com/2015/01/configuring-automatic-failover-using.html

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 2 - compilation issues.

On 05/12/2017 09:19 AM, Martin Goodson wrote: On 12/05/2017 16:59, Adrian Klaver wrote: Configuring Automatic failover using Replication Manager 2.0 on PostgreSQL 9.3.5 http://raghavt.blogspot.com/2015/01/configuring-automatic-failover-using.html "In this post, am demonstrating Replicatio

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 2 - compilation issues.

On 05/12/2017 09:14 AM, Martin Goodson wrote: On 12/05/2017 16:48, Adrian Klaver wrote: On 05/12/2017 08:30 AM, Martin Goodson wrote: On 12/05/2017 16:18, Joshua D. Drake wrote: The EDB installer allows you to specify where to install PostgreSQL, and uses /opt/PostgreSQL/ for the default.

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 2 - compilation issues.

On 12/05/2017 16:59, Adrian Klaver wrote: Configuring Automatic failover using Replication Manager 2.0 on PostgreSQL 9.3.5 http://raghavt.blogspot.com/2015/01/configuring-automatic-failover-using.html "In this post, am demonstrating Replication Manager on single node(localhost) on RHEL 6.

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 2 - compilation issues.

On 12/05/2017 16:48, Adrian Klaver wrote: On 05/12/2017 08:30 AM, Martin Goodson wrote: On 12/05/2017 16:18, Joshua D. Drake wrote: Thanks for the response. The problem is I'm kind of stuck with using EnterpriseDB's community edition installers. It's a company policy. I can't install Postg

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 2 - compilation issues.

On 05/12/2017 08:30 AM, Martin Goodson wrote: On 12/05/2017 16:18, Joshua D. Drake wrote: On 05/12/2017 08:13 AM, Martin Goodson wrote: Hello. Thanks for the response. The problem is I'm kind of stuck with using EnterpriseDB's community edition installers. It's a company policy. I can't in

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 2 - compilation issues.

On 05/12/2017 08:30 AM, Martin Goodson wrote: On 12/05/2017 16:18, Joshua D. Drake wrote: Thanks for the response. The problem is I'm kind of stuck with using EnterpriseDB's community edition installers. It's a company policy. I can't install PostgreSQL using repositories, I ** have ** to u

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 2 - compilation issues.

On 05/12/2017 08:13 AM, Martin Goodson wrote: Hello. Yesterday I had problems getting repmgr installed, since our PostgreSQL installs to a non-standard place, and doesn't use any postgresql repositories/packages. The responses I got generally seemed to be 'you need to compile it'. Time for

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 2 - compilation issues.

On 12/05/2017 16:18, Joshua D. Drake wrote: On 05/12/2017 08:13 AM, Martin Goodson wrote: Hello. Yesterday I had problems getting repmgr installed, since our PostgreSQL installs to a non-standard place, and doesn't use any postgresql repositories/packages. The responses I got generally seemed

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 2 - compilation issues.

On 05/12/2017 08:13 AM, Martin Goodson wrote: Hello. Yesterday I had problems getting repmgr installed, since our PostgreSQL installs to a non-standard place, and doesn't use any postgresql repositories/packages. The responses I got generally seemed to be 'you need to compile it'. I'm running u

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB install of Postgres on Ubuntu 10.04 library path issues - no version information available (required by /lib/libblkid.so.1)

(Please CC to the list... This could be useful to other people too..) On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Scott Chapman wrote: > Thanks! That worked great. > Nice to hear that it solved the issue. -- Thanks & Regards, Ashesh Vashi EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB install of Postgres on Ubuntu 10.04 library path issues - no version information available (required by /lib/libblkid.so.1)

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Scott Chapman wrote: > Downloaded > http://get.enterprisedb.com/postgresql/postgresql-9.1.3-1-linux.run > Ran it. Install went fine. > StackBuilder install of PostGIS 1.5 failed. No error given. I can't > find it in the logs. So I ran /tmp/edb_postgis_1_5_pg91.b

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB-xDBReplicationServer java process on OS X.

On Jun 5, 2011, at 4:02 PM, piscesboy wrote: > I have a process called "java" showing up in my Activity Monitor that > uses a good amount of CPU (4 - 8% average, 100 - 120% on occasion). It > reports that "launchd" is its parent process and that postgres is its > user. > > I did a ps axv|grep ja

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB-xDBReplicationServer java process on OS X.

On 06/05/2011 03:32 AM, piscesboy wrote: I have a process called "java" showing up in my Activity Monitor that uses a good amount of CPU (4 - 8% average, 100 - 120% on occasion). It reports that "launchd" is its parent process and that postgres is its user. I did a ps axv|grep java and found out

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB

It is my understanding that EnterpriseDB has many extensions built on top of PostgreSQL 8.1, and I doubt that an EnterpriseDB backup could be restored into the open source version of PostgreSQL. It would probably error out once it tried to create a stored procedure with the oracle compatib

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB

Matthew Hixson wrote: > Just a normal, downloaded from www.postgresql.org, PostgreSQL 8.1 > database. I imagine Terry's question stems from what would appear to be a straightforward scenario, and hence the need to ask. For the second part of your question, are you asking simply if you can dump a

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB

Terry Fielder wrote: By "regular PostgreSQL" do you mean a PostgreSQL 7.x install? No he probably means the current Open Source release from the PostgreSQL Development group thus 8.1.3. Joshua D. Drake Terry Fielder [EMAIL PROTECTED] Associate Director Software Development and Deployment

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB

Just a normal, downloaded from www.postgresql.org, PostgreSQL 8.1 database. -M@ On May 5, 2006, at 4:56 PM, Terry Fielder wrote: By "regular PostgreSQL" do you mean a PostgreSQL 7.x install? Terry Fielder [EMAIL PROTECTED] Associate Director Software Development and Deployment Great Gulf H

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB

By "regular PostgreSQL" do you mean a PostgreSQL 7.x install? Terry Fielder [EMAIL PROTECTED] Associate Director Software Development and Deployment Great Gulf Homes / Ashton Woods Homes Fax: (416) 441-9085 Matthew Hixson wrote: http://www.enterprisedb.com/news_events/press_releases/04_24_06.

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB

Benjamin Arai wrote: Is the PL support in EnterpriseDB worth the money? Are there any specific benefits that I should specifically be aware of? It depends.. do you want plSQL/Oracle compatibility? If so... then probably. If not... then the base PostgreSQL pl support is more then enough conside

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Benjamin Arai") wrote: > Is the PL support in EnterpriseDB worth the money?  Are there any > specific benefits that I should specifically be aware of? I dunno; this is a PostgreSQL list, and many (most?) of us have never used EnterpriseDB. The people that can answer your *seco

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB mentioned in eweek, and...

Klint Gore wrote: On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 21:54:45 -0500, Tony Caduto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I agree, SCO is vile, but Borland what the heck are they thinking. It's borland. Every few years they fly off in a bizarre direction. If kylix is anything to go by, they won't be doing mu

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB mentioned in eweek, and...

On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 21:54:45 -0500, Tony Caduto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree, SCO is vile, but Borland what the heck are they thinking. It's borland. Every few years they fly off in a bizarre direction. If kylix is anything to go by, they won't be doing much anyway. Perhaps someone f

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB mentioned in eweek, and...

Tony Caduto wrote: according to the article they "make postgresql" :-) http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1846635,00.asp Worse, they are partnering with SCO. Sorry Denis/Andy I just can't agree with that one. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake ---(end of broadcast)-

Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB mentioned in eweek, and...

I agree, SCO is vile, but Borland what the heck are they thinking. Tony Joshua D. Drake wrote: Tony Caduto wrote: according to the article they "make postgresql" :-) http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1846635,00.asp Worse, they are partnering with SCO. Sorry Denis/Andy I just can't