On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 09:20:33AM -0800, Steve Atkins wrote:
> packages, so there are an awful lot of versions of the postgresql
> application, some very different from a users point of view.
>
> I tend to think of that as feature as much as bug, but it does
> cause some confusion while trying to
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Don't get me wrong the debugger is certainly useful but I see no
technical argument (and I am sure you will correct me if I am wrong :))
that deems it needs to be in core.
Joshua D. Drake
I would have to disagree.
So if you are using Oracle do you have to go throu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 11:00:36 -0500
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Something like that could work well for modules that are moderately
> independent of the core database version. I'm afraid that won't be
> true for the plpgsql debugger, unfort
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 02:03:50PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> At some point it might get integrated, but right now it seems to need
> its own release schedule. We put the core hooks in for 8.2 but the
> thing didn't actually get published for many months after that.
What I'd prefer, in any case,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 12:34:36 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 09:20:33AM -0800, Steve Atkins wrote:
> > packages, so there are an awful lot of versions of the postgresql
> > application, some very different fr
On Nov 15, 2007, at 8:57 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 10:41:23AM -0600, Tony Caduto wrote:
So if you are using Oracle do you have to go through the hassle of
finding it, then compiling and installing it?
This canard comes up every time we discuss keeping the codebase
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 11:57:28 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (None of this is an argument against Tom's point that deep-in-there
> hooks at least have to be shipped with the core stuff. The same is
> true for replication, for insta
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 10:41:23AM -0600, Tony Caduto wrote:
>
> So if you are using Oracle do you have to go through the hassle of
> finding it, then compiling and installing it?
This canard comes up every time we discuss keeping the codebase lean, and I
say the same thing every time: Oracle (a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 10:41:23 -0600
Tony Caduto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> I would have to disagree.
>
:)
> So if you are using Oracle do you have to go through the hassle of
> finding it, then compiling and installing it?
That is what t
Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 02:03:50PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> At some point it might get integrated, but right now it seems to need
>> its own release schedule. We put the core hooks in for 8.2 but the
>> thing didn't actually get published for many mon
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:44:39 -0500
> brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I should have pointed out that I wasn't questioning whether or not
> > there was an article that stated this. I was simply pointing out that
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:01:04 +
Richard Huxton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:49:37 -0600
> > Tony Caduto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Her
Tony Caduto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Who said anything was incorrect? It's just a bit misleading (the Info
> Week Article).
Three out of the four features mentioned in your quote are not part of
core Postgres, so the author was obviously taking a very wide view of
what "Postgres" is. Or was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:44:39 -0500
brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I should have pointed out that I wasn't questioning whether or not
> there was an article that stated this. I was simply pointing out that
> the debugger was *not* included in the r
Tony Caduto wrote:
brian wrote:
I don't know what you're referring to when you say it was "advertised
as a feature" but it's not a part of the PG release. You can get it here:
Here ya go:
http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=201803375
From the article:
After n
> --- Original Message ---
> From: Richard Huxton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: 14/11/07, 19:01:04
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PLpgsql debugger question
>
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > -BEGIN P
Richard Huxton wrote:
So you're saying the finished plpgsql debugger will be available from
www.postgresql.org ?
"After nine months of work, the new features in 8.3 will be available
at www.postgreSQL.org. They will include:
* A finished PL/pgSQL debugger"
There is no mention of an
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:49:37 -0600
Tony Caduto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here ya go:
http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=201803375
I see nothing incorrect in that article.
Sincerely,
Jo
Richard Huxton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> It is a pgfoundry project which is part of PostgreSQL. A quick co
>> of /trunk shows that it is not in contrib.
> Which is probably an error IMHO. If anything makes sense as part of
> /contrib it's a procedural-language debugg
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:49:37 -0600
Tony Caduto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here ya go:
http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=201803375
Now you know what I am talking about :-)
I see nothing incor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:49:37 -0600
Tony Caduto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> Here ya go:
>
> http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=201803375
>
> Now you know what I am talking about :-)
I see nothing incorrect in that a
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Which is probably an error IMHO. If anything makes sense as part of
/contrib it's a procedural-language debugger module.
Take it up with those who didn't submit it for inclusion :)
Fair enough.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
---(end of broa
brian wrote:
I don't know what you're referring to when you say it was "advertised
as a feature" but it's not a part of the PG release. You can get it here:
Here ya go:
http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=201803375
From the article:
After nine months of work,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 18:40:26 +
Richard Huxton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > So the debugger is a feature of 8.3. It just isn't included in core.
> >
> >>> Is it going to be included as a contrib module or something else?
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
So the debugger is a feature of 8.3. It just isn't included in core.
Is it going to be included as a contrib module or something else?
It is a pgfoundry project which is part of PostgreSQL. A quick co
of /trunk shows that it is not in contrib.
Which is probably an err
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:46:07 -0500
brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tony Caduto wrote:
> >
> > Back in Sept the debugger was advertised as a feature of 8.3, so if
> > it's not included how is it a feature?
Advocacy of PostgreSQL includes more than
Tony Caduto wrote:
Back in Sept the debugger was advertised as a feature of 8.3, so if it's
not included how is it a feature?
Is it going to be included as a contrib module or something else? I am
talking about the server side stuff not the EDB GUI client.
I don't know what you're referri
Tom Lane wrote:
Tony Caduto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
As I understand it the debugger functions are included by default in
8.3,
That's incorrect.
regards, tom lane
Ok, thanks for the info.
Back in Sept the debugger was advertised as a feature of 8.3, so
Tony Caduto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As I understand it the debugger functions are included by default in
> 8.3,
That's incorrect.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
Hi,
Does anyone know if there is a debugger function that will return the
line numbers that are executable?
Also, is the debugger code available at pgfoundry the GUI client that
EnterpriseDB has done or is the module that needs to be installed on the
server?
As I understand it the debugger
30 matches
Mail list logo
