Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch adds all missing export symbols to libnci_test.dll that are
> needed by t/pmc/nci.t.
Thanks, applied.
leo
Either
--- S03.pod.old 2005-02-06 13:12:21.0 +0100
+++ S03.pod 2005-02-06 13:12:46.0 +0100
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@
autoincrement ++ --
exponentiation **
symbolic unary ! + - ~ ? * ** +^ ~^ ?^ \
-multiplicative * / % x xx +& +<< +>> ~& ~<< ~>>
+
I actually just looked over the patch and it was actually for changing
'name' to 'comment', not 'description'.
I am actually going to agree with you, 'comment' does seem the best
fit. 'description' would be my second choice, and 'label' third.
- Steve
On Feb 5, 2005, at 3:23 PM, Ian Langworth w
# New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer
# Please include the string: [perl #34073]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34073 >
Hi,
this patch repairs the creation of executables from Parrot bytecode files.
# New Ticket Created by Jeff Dik
# Please include the string: [perl #34072]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34072 >
Hi,
Parrot's been failing to build on my ibook without a little help.
Here's the error:
C
(Sorry for the cross-posting; announcement of future releases will
appear only on the perl6-compiler list.)
Quite appropriately, on Day 6 of Pugs, I have released Pugs 6.0.0.
It should be on a CPAN near you in a few hours, under the Perl6::Pugs
namespace. You may install it from the CPAN shell j
Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon writes:
> Alexey Trofimenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >my $var = "test";
> >my @arr := $var;
> > error? or maybe it would be the same weirdness, like in former example? or
> > maybe it's a ["test"]?
>
> The := operator uses the same rules as parameter passing.
On Feb 6, 2005, at 2:16 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 06:59:26PM -0500, Ian Langworth wrote:
'comment', however, seems just right -- it implies a short, optional
description.
I like comment, too. It already has a meaning in Perl (and every other
language) and its just the sa
Last I checked, IPC::Open3 has portability issues.
Right. My original patch made T::H::S use that, but I now prefer to
put
that burden on the program that uses the module to make sure that
diagnostics come in correctly.
I should NOT have applied that? It's already on my trunk.
xoa
--
Andy Lester
Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> assign nci_dlvar_float, nci_dlvar_float_decl
This calls Undef::assign, which morphs the Undef to the RHS type. So the
Undef becomes an array and
> N2 = nci_dlvar_float[0]
this succeeds.
leo
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> assign nci_dlvar_float, nci_dlvar_float_decl
> This calls Undef::assign, which morphs the Undef to the RHS type. So the
> Undef becomes an array and
>> N2 = nci_dlvar_float[0]
> this succeeds.
I see. Does this morphing
On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 10:40 -0800, Jeff Dik wrote:
> So, I just commented out line 14 of jit/ppc/core.jit [patch attached],
> recompiled, and ran "make fulltest". Only one test failed (test 5 of
> t/dynclass/pyclass.t). I'm guessing that merely commenting that line
> out is *not* The Right Way(T
On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 15:08 -0500, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Last I checked, IPC::Open3 has portability issues.
Right. My original patch made T::H::S use that, but I now prefer to put
that burden on the program that uses the module to make sure that
diagnostics come in correctly.
> There's als
Leon Brocard sent the following bits through the ether:
> http://astray.com/tmp/phalanx.html
This now mentions core modules and notices Mandrake contrib
(Module-Packaged 0.79 just hit CPAN), so Mandrake jumps from 28 -> 87.
Leon
--
Leon Brocard.http://www.astray.co
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 03:12:20PM -0500, Stevan Little wrote:
> I sent Schwern a patch to change 'names' to 'description', but then
> Andy brought up the idea of 'labels'. At the time, Schwern said it was
> 'in the pipeline', but I expect its actually been moved out since.
If its not in the RT
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 04:47:55PM -0800, chromatic wrote:
> > Let me second that one! Of course, Andy's already made it clear that
> > he doesn't have a lot of time, but I still don't mind kicking 'im. :)
>
> I think the right approach is to patch T::H::S to collect diagnostic
> information and
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 06:59:26PM -0500, Ian Langworth wrote:
> 'comment', however, seems just right -- it implies a short, optional
> description.
I like comment, too. It already has a meaning in Perl (and every other
language) and its just the same.
So as of right now, that's official.
On Feb 6, 2005, at 3:16 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 06:59:26PM -0500, Ian Langworth wrote:
'comment', however, seems just right -- it implies a short, optional
description.
I like comment, too. It already has a meaning in Perl (and every other
language) and its just the sa
Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see. Does this morphing work as designed? Creating an array out of
> an undef feels somewhat wrong.
Yes and yes ;)
A longer answer is: all operators currently need an existing LHS. The
canonical way is:
lhs = new Undef
lhs = a b
While we AFAIK
19 matches
Mail list logo
