On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 03:12:20PM -0500, Stevan Little wrote: > I sent Schwern a patch to change 'names' to 'description', but then > Andy brought up the idea of 'labels'. At the time, Schwern said it was > 'in the pipeline', but I expect its actually been moved out since.
If its not in the RT queue its likely to get/have been lost. > Personally, I view them as 'descriptions' since thats what I usually > write. But 'labels' makes sense too, if you use them that way. However, > 'name' just never made since to me though, and initially was a source > of confusion when I first read Test::Tutorial and co. I'm leaning towards agreeing "label" being marginally better than "name" and its shorter than "description".
