On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 04:47:55PM -0800, chromatic wrote: > > Let me second that one! Of course, Andy's already made it clear that > > he doesn't have a lot of time, but I still don't mind kicking 'im. :) > > I think the right approach is to patch T::H::S to collect diagnostic > information and make it available. It's easy enough to grab it via > IPC::Open3 elsewhere and pass a combined STDOUT/STDERR filehandle to > analyze_fh().
Last I checked, IPC::Open3 has portability issues. There's also the problem of making sure the resulting output is properly mixed when it comes to the screen. If you know how to assure that, let me know.
