No one objected to resolving this ticket, so I am doing so now. New
Smolder issues? Open a new RT.
Since thanks to Michael Peters' work on Smolder we now have a Smolder
server, and since thanks in large part to Dan Magnuszewski we have lots
of Smolder reports daily, I think we have achieved the major objectives
of this RT.
I recommend that the ticket be marked resolved and that, if new
Smolder-
Using TAP::Harness::Archive 0.12, successfully ran a "make
smolder_test" on windows.
http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/report_details/2381
---
tjh
On Jul 19, 2008, at 8:51 AM, Michael Peters wrote:
Tim Heckman wrote:
One thing I've found is that I cannot install
TAP::Harne
Tim Heckman wrote:
One thing I've found is that I cannot install TAP::Harness::Archive on
windows machines because of test failures.
I submitted a ticket about this to rt.cpan.org for this along with
possible fixes
http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=37795
I saw those and will try
One thing I've found is that I cannot install TAP::Harness::Archive
on windows machines because of test failures.
I submitted a ticket about this to rt.cpan.org for this along with
possible fixes
http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=37795
tjh
On Jul 15, 2008, at 10:35 AM,
James Keenan via RT wrote:
Since we've applied and refined the patches that Michael Peters
originally submitted, is there any particular reason to keep this RT open?
Not that I can think of. Close away!
--
Michael Peters
Plus Three, LP
And I applied one little grammatical correction.
Since we've applied and refined the patches that Michael Peters
originally submitted, is there any particular reason to keep this RT open?
kid51
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Michael Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Keenan via RT wrote:
>>
>> I was told on #parrot that you have to replace # TODO comments by
>> creating RT tickets and referencing the RT instead of the TODO.
>>
>> Perhaps it would be simpler to just delete these
James Keenan via RT wrote:
I was told on #parrot that you have to replace # TODO comments by
creating RT tickets and referencing the RT instead of the TODO.
Perhaps it would be simpler to just delete these comments. Please
advise. Thank you very much.
The first one (line 103) refers to the
On Jul 18, 2008, at 3:37 AM, Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT wrote:
I was told on #parrot that you have to replace # TODO comments by
creating RT tickets and referencing the RT instead of the TODO.
Perhaps it would be simpler to just delete these comments. Please
advise. Thank you very much.
James Keenan via RT schrieb:
Michael:
I install TAP::Harness::Archive from CPAN, then applied the patches to a
fresh checkout from trunk. I configured, built and ran 'make
smolder_test'. The Smolder test completed and stated that it uploaded
-- though I have a tough time matching my particular
Michael:
I install TAP::Harness::Archive from CPAN, then applied the patches to a
fresh checkout from trunk. I configured, built and ran 'make
smolder_test'. The Smolder test completed and stated that it uploaded
-- though I have a tough time matching my particular report to those at
http://smol
Michael Peters wrote:
> Here's some more patches to improve things. It adds the following:
>
> + require TAP::Harness::Archive 0.10 so we can add extra_properties to our
> TAP
> archives.
> + Collect Architecture, Compiler, DEVEL, Optimize, Perl Version, Platform,
> SVN
> Revision an
Here's some more patches to improve things. It adds the following:
+ require TAP::Harness::Archive 0.10 so we can add extra_properties to our TAP
archives.
+ Collect Architecture, Compiler, DEVEL, Optimize, Perl Version, Platform, SVN
Revision and Version data into our TAP archives as
On Tuesday 01 July 2008 16:47:23 Michael Peters wrote:
> The "make smolder_test" target is supposed to create it. It's the TAP
> archive. Does it exist anywhere on your system?
Oh nevermind, that was my mistake. Fixed in r28927.
-- c
On Tuesday 01 July 2008 16:47:23 Michael Peters wrote:
> James Keenan via RT wrote:
> > What is this parrot_test_run.tar.gz?
> The "make smolder_test" target is supposed to create it. It's the TAP
> archive. Does it exist anywhere on your system?
I'm not getting it either, for some reason.
-- c
James Keenan via RT wrote:
> What is this parrot_test_run.tar.gz?
The "make smolder_test" target is supposed to create it. It's the TAP archive.
Does it exist anywhere on your system?
--
Michael Peters
Plus Three, LP
But we're not out of the woods yet!
After installing all these prerequisites:
Devel::Symdump
Pod::Coverage
Test::Pod
Test::Pod::Coverage
YAML::Tiny
TAP::Harness::Archive
... I said 'make smolder_test' and got output that ended up here:
/usr/local/bin/perl t/harness --gc-debug --running-make-tes
On Tue Jul 01 11:43:43 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 July 2008 04:44:55 James Keenan via RT wrote:
>
> > Applying this patch, my 'make test' immediately failed.
>
> Does this patch fix it?
>
> -- c
>
Works on the computer from which I originally reported the problem:
Perl 5.1
On Tue Jul 01 11:43:43 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 July 2008 04:44:55 James Keenan via RT wrote:
>
> > Applying this patch, my 'make test' immediately failed.
>
> Does this patch fix it?
>
So far so good. On a different box from the one on which I experienced
the error, I c
On Tuesday 01 July 2008 04:44:55 James Keenan via RT wrote:
> Applying this patch, my 'make test' immediately failed.
Does this patch fix it?
-- c
=== t/harness
==
--- t/harness (revision 28942)
+++ t/harness (local)
@@ -75,7 +75,7
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 7:49 AM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I should add that this was the result of 'svn up', not of applying a patch:
>
> $ svn info
> Path: .
> URL: https://svn.perl.org/parrot/trunk
> Repository Root: https://svn.perl.org/parrot
> Repository UUID: d31e2699-5
I should add that this was the result of 'svn up', not of applying a patch:
$ svn info
Path: .
URL: https://svn.perl.org/parrot/trunk
Repository Root: https://svn.perl.org/parrot
Repository UUID: d31e2699-5ff4-0310-a27c-f18f2fbe73fe
Revision: 28889
Node Kind: directory
Schedule: normal
Last Change
Applying this patch, my 'make test' immediately failed.
Compiling with:
xx.c
/usr/bin/gcc -I./include -fno-common -no-cpp-precomp -pipe
-I/opt/local/include -pipe -fno-common -Wno-long-double
-DHASATTRIBUTE_CONST -DHASATTRIBUTE_DEPRECATED -DHASATTRIBUTE_MALLOC
-DHASATTRIBUTE_NONNULL -DHASATTRIBUTE
On Wednesday 18 June 2008 07:42:00 Michael Peters wrote:
> It seems that archname was not defined in $PConfig, so I just used cpuarch.
> I also changed $^X to be $PConfig{osname}. The fixed patch is attached.
>
> I also noticed that I didn't include the new Test::Harness in that patch.
> So I've a
James,
Did you svn add the new files first? I didn't see any new files in that
diff... You can usually get a commit bit by asking on #perl6 on
irc.freenode.net
Cheers,
C.J.
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 12:37 -0700, James Keenan wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by James Keenan
> # Please include the s
... and now, adding Jerry Gay's comment:
excellent! this came together quickly and simply, by the looks of it.
the patch format is fine, especially for a first patch (for more
details of our precise requirements you can read
docs/submissions.pod). one gotcha, you've got 'use Config;' which
pulls i
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan
# Please include the string: [perl #55954]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=55954 >
Forwarding Michael's post so that an RT is opened.
I've got this working pretty well on
28 matches
Mail list logo
