[perl #41802] [BUG] GC errors with PGE (may have failing tests!)

2007-11-25 Thread Will Coleda via RT
On Tue Mar 13 12:44:33 2007, particle wrote: > in order to help find some long-standing garbage collector bugs, in > r17470 i've just disabled the -G flag on three PGE test files. see the > content of the patch below. this may cause test failures due to a gc > bug. > > this ticket serves to notify

[perl #47826] [DOCS] NCI

2007-11-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda # Please include the string: [perl #47826] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=47826 > The NCI information in docs/books is out of date. per codyl on #parrot, the code doesn'

[perl #45109] [Lisp] Breakage when an unused PMC is removed

2007-11-25 Thread Will Coleda via RT
On Sat Sep 01 02:32:28 2007, bernhard wrote: > In languages/lisp/system.pir there are 4 unused PMCs declared. > Removing one of them breaks Lisp. > > Here is an example session: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/devel/Parrot/repos/parrot/languages/lisp$ svn diff > Index: system.pir >

[perl #47061] [BUG] Segfault after parallell build

2007-11-25 Thread Will Coleda via RT
On Sun Nov 25 20:10:02 2007, coke wrote: > On Wed Oct 31 13:21:19 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Subject: [BUG] Segfault after parallell build > > > > Sorry, didn't read the output carefully enough: it's a compilation > > error, not a segfault. The other informations should be accurate ;) > >

[perl #47061] [BUG] || build failure.

2007-11-25 Thread Will Coleda via RT
On Wed Oct 31 13:21:19 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Subject: [BUG] Segfault after parallell build > > Sorry, didn't read the output carefully enough: it's a compilation > error, not a segfault. The other informations should be accurate ;) > This is due to the fact that there are items in r

[perl #47792] [BUG]: languages/dotnet/Configure.pl causes configuration error

2007-11-25 Thread Will Coleda via RT
r23011 added code to config/gen/languages.pm to configure dotnet when configuring parrot instead of (as before) manually, after parrot was built. This isn't ready to happen yet. Reverting 23011 in spirit, dotnet is on its own again. fixed in r23065.

[perl #47792] [BUG]: languages/dotnet/Configure.pl causes configuration error

2007-11-25 Thread James Keenan via RT
On Sun Nov 25 15:05:59 2007, ptc wrote: > I too am running Configure.pl constantly, however, not dotnet's > Configure.pl. This is the script I was referring to. > Well, now it's happening in ./Configure.pl -- which means we have a big problem, because everyone who configures is going to see it.

[perl #47822] [Cola] - uses old 'float' type.

2007-11-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda # Please include the string: [perl #47822] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=47822 > The generated a.pir file is generating code like: .local float foo instead of .local n

[perl #47816] Tcl Segfault

2007-11-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda # Please include the string: [perl #47816] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=47816 > Yet another tcl segfault, this time on feather. (linux) Revision: 23055 1) build tcl.

Re: Current roadmap for Perl 6 on Parrot

2007-11-25 Thread Kevin Z
Hi, here/hear, hear/here, on the 'ghost town' point... it's an immense surprise given the size of CPAN that there is such a 'ghost town' feel about some (if not all) of Perl6... Regards, K On Nov 25, 2007 2:58 PM, brian d foy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Patrick

Re: [svn:parrot] r23050 - trunk/tools/build

2007-11-25 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 03:09:22PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Log: > [tools] Allow other double-quoted strings in a line with the CONST_STRING() > macro, as long as there's an even number of quotes. This (still) doesn't work > if there's an escaped double-quote, but it never did and it hasn

Re: [perl #47792] [BUG]: languages/dotnet/Configure.pl causes configuration error

2007-11-25 Thread Paul Cochrane
On 25/11/2007, James E Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 25, 2007, at 12:52 PM, Paul Cochrane via RT wrote: > > >> > > > > This error has been happening in dotnet for a long time. I can't give > > you a better timeframe than that, but it's been in that state (giving > > these warnings)

[perl #47792] [BUG]: languages/dotnet/Configure.pl causes configuration error

2007-11-25 Thread James Keenan via RT
On Sun Nov 25 09:52:45 2007, ptc wrote: > > This error has been happening in dotnet for a long time. I can't give > you a better timeframe than that, but it's been in that state (giving > these warnings) since before I managed to get it's Configure.pl to go > again, (which was a few months ago n

Re: [perl #47792] [BUG]: languages/dotnet/Configure.pl causes configuration error

2007-11-25 Thread James E Keenan
On Nov 25, 2007, at 12:52 PM, Paul Cochrane via RT wrote: This error has been happening in dotnet for a long time. I can't give you a better timeframe than that, but it's been in that state (giving these warnings) since before I managed to get it's Configure.pl to go again, (which was a few

Re: CONST_STRING vs string_from_literal ?

2007-11-25 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 12:57:35PM -0800, chromatic wrote: > On Sunday 25 November 2007 12:37:13 Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 11:50:15AM -0800, chromatic wrote: > > > > It doesn't *always* work. For example, I think CONST_STRING() doesn't > > > work in PCCMETHODs in PM

Re: CONST_STRING vs string_from_literal ?

2007-11-25 Thread chromatic
On Sunday 25 November 2007 12:37:13 Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 11:50:15AM -0800, chromatic wrote: > > It doesn't *always* work. For example, I think CONST_STRING() doesn't > > work in PCCMETHODs in PMCs for some reason I can't explain, and it > > doesn't work in other so

Re: CONST_STRING vs string_from_literal ?

2007-11-25 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 11:50:15AM -0800, chromatic wrote: > On Sunday 25 November 2007 10:35:01 Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 09:19:20AM -0800, chromatic wrote: > > > > CONST_STRING() is 100% more awesome, because it's completely constant. > > > [...] > > > PDD 15 branc

Re: [svn:parrot] r23034 - in trunk: . include/parrot src/pmc t/pmc

2007-11-25 Thread chromatic
On Sunday 25 November 2007 04:23:59 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Added: >trunk/include/parrot/scheduler.h (contents, props changed) >trunk/src/pmc/scheduler.pmc (contents, props changed) >trunk/src/pmc/task.pmc (contents, props changed) >trunk/t/pmc/scheduler.t (contents, pro

Re: CONST_STRING vs string_from_literal ?

2007-11-25 Thread chromatic
On Sunday 25 November 2007 10:35:01 Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 09:19:20AM -0800, chromatic wrote: > > CONST_STRING() is 100% more awesome, because it's completely constant. > > [...] > > PDD 15 branch after replacing string_from_literal() with CONST_STRING(). > > We shoul

[perl #47794] [BUG] objects - :method doesn't work with :outer()

2007-11-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud # Please include the string: [perl #47794] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=47794 > The :method flag on subs doesn't seem to work when the :outer flag is present. H

Re: Current roadmap for Perl 6 on Parrot

2007-11-25 Thread jesse
> > If you're interested in hacking on the compiler, my suggestion > > is to become somewhat familiar with the compiler tools already > > available in Parrot. > > I'm not interested in hacking on the compiler, but I am interested in > writing tests. I've added some to the Pugs project, but tha

Re: CONST_STRING vs string_from_literal ?

2007-11-25 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 09:19:20AM -0800, chromatic wrote: > On Sunday 25 November 2007 07:15:01 Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > > What's the difference between CONST_STRING and string_from_literal? > > In particular, which one should be used when? In some code I see > > things like: > > > > # sr

Re: [perl #47792] [BUG]: languages/dotnet/Configure.pl causes configuration error

2007-11-25 Thread Paul Cochrane
On 25/11/2007, via RT James Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # New Ticket Created by James Keenan > # Please include the string: [perl #47792] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=47792 > > > > While running Co

[perl #47792] [BUG]: languages/dotnet/Configure.pl causes configuration error

2007-11-25 Thread James Keenan via RT
This bug is also preventing me from successfully calling 'make realclean': /usr/local/bin/perl -MExtUtils::Command -e rm_f \ "runtime/parrot/dynext/*.so" \ "runtime/parrot/dynext/*.so" \ "runtime/parrot/dynext/*.lib" \ "*.pdb" "runtime/parrot/dynext/*.pdb" \ "*.ilk" "runtime/pa

[perl #47792] [BUG]: languages/dotnet/Configure.pl causes configuration error

2007-11-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan # Please include the string: [perl #47792] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=47792 > While running Configure.pl on Linux today, I repeatedly got this error: Configuring lan

Re: CONST_STRING vs string_from_literal ?

2007-11-25 Thread chromatic
On Sunday 25 November 2007 07:15:01 Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > What's the difference between CONST_STRING and string_from_literal? > In particular, which one should be used when? In some code I see > things like: > > # src/pmc/exporter.pmc > STRING *s_hash = CONST_STRING(interp, "h

Re: Current roadmap for Perl 6 on Parrot

2007-11-25 Thread brian d foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How others can start hacking and contributing > - > > If you're interested in hacking on the compiler, my suggestion > is to become somewhat familiar with the compiler

CONST_STRING vs string_from_literal ?

2007-11-25 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
What's the difference between CONST_STRING and string_from_literal? In particular, which one should be used when? In some code I see things like: # src/pmc/exporter.pmc STRING *s_hash = CONST_STRING(interp, "hash"); and in others we have # src/pmc/codestring.pmc STRING *pe

Re: [svn:parrot] r22924 - trunk/src/pmc

2007-11-25 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 01:56:51PM +0200, Allison Randal wrote: > Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > >I just want to add a reminder here that the whole reason PCT, > >PAST-pm, and Tcl use morph in the first place is because Parrot > >doesn't provide a usable "replace pmc with clone" opcode, and > >using m

[perl #31633] [TODO] Allow Languages to be self contained

2007-11-25 Thread James Keenan via RT
On Sat Nov 24 13:26:01 2007, bernhard wrote: > On Mi. 05. Jul. 2006, 12:17:12, bernhard wrote: > > > > Contrive things so that no code whatsover must be maintained outside > > > of the language specific directory. This includes: > [snip] > config/gen/languages.pm handles the configuration of lan

[svn:parrot-pdd] r23033 - trunk/docs/pdds

2007-11-25 Thread allison
Author: allison Date: Sun Nov 25 04:20:21 2007 New Revision: 23033 Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd17_pmc.pod Log: [pdd] Adding a pmclass modifier for role conflict resolution (partial). Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd17_pmc.pod

[svn:parrot-pdd] r23032 - in trunk/docs: imcc pdds/draft

2007-11-25 Thread allison
Author: allison Date: Sun Nov 25 04:15:55 2007 New Revision: 23032 Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd19_pir.pod Changes in other areas also in this revision: Modified: trunk/docs/imcc/calling_conventions.pod Log: [pdd] Moving content from IMCC docs to PIR PDD. Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/

[svn:parrot-pdd] r23030 - trunk/docs/pdds

2007-11-25 Thread allison
Author: allison Date: Sun Nov 25 04:02:44 2007 New Revision: 23030 Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd25_concurrency.pod Log: [pdd] More details on the structure and API for Scheduler and Task PMCs. Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd25_concurrency.pod ===

Re: [svn:parrot] r22924 - trunk/src/pmc

2007-11-25 Thread Allison Randal
Patrick R. Michaud wrote: I just want to add a reminder here that the whole reason PCT, PAST-pm, and Tcl use morph in the first place is because Parrot doesn't provide a usable "replace pmc with clone" opcode, and using morph+assign is a workaround. In other words, if a "replace pmc" opcode exis