On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 17:02, Arjuna Anandanatha wrote:
> ///All you need to do is buy Microsoft Office X (latest version, of
> course) and you'll have near 100% compatibility between your Excel
> and Word documents on both platforms.
...or use any flavor of the free Open Office suite which is ofte
4 important non-upgradeable things that would make me choose the
Powerbook:
- more pixels on the screen (1280x854 versus 1024x768)
- a larger screen
- a better video card (only important for 3D work and games but also
makes the OS run smoother)
- DVI video output
Wifi coverage is better on the i
On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 09:23, Juan Buhler wrote:
> > > http://www.boozhoundlabs.com/holga-f/
>
> On 8/4/05, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Didn't Juan do something like this?
>
> Back in 2000...
>
> http://www.jbuhler.com/HLimited/index.html
:)
It's a good lens. I payed 141 Euros + shipping for mine.
> J. C. O'Connell wrote:
>
> >Ended Auction:
> >
> >http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7530372848
> >
> >I got the above lens in the mail today. Certainly the
> >best $24 lens in my entire life. The sucker is virtually
> >l
Shutter lag is my main disappointment with digital cameras.
The two Leica/Panasonic are slow. I tried only one camera
that is acceptable on this, the Sony T3. There may be more,
I don't know. Also a tilt/swivel LCD like the Canon G1 for
waist level shooting would be nice.
Joaquim
On Fri, 2005-0
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 17:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If, as Rod says, the top image is from the DSLR, either someone doesn't know
> what they're doing with that DSLR or they're having a bit of fun at our
> expense. It's quite obvious that one can achieve accurate white balance with
> a DSLR w
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 17:03, Rob Studdert wrote:
> ...
> whether 12 bits per colour channel would make make an appreciable visible
> difference given the dynamics of current display technology is arguable
> (given
> the relatively low contrast ratios of even the best TFT displays). I'd be
> ha
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 15:13, Rob Studdert wrote:
> On 22 Jul 2005 at 16:11, Joaquim Carvalho wrote:
>
> > (Regardless of the raw vs jpg discussion) using 8 bits formats to store
> > photographs is just plain stupid.
> > Why the hell is anyone happy with a 0-255 dynami
(Regardless of the raw vs jpg discussion) using 8 bits formats to store
photographs is just plain stupid.
Why the hell is anyone happy with a 0-255 dynamic range when modern CCDs
do a lot better (0-4095), film does a lot better and our eyes do a lot
better?
This reverence for the holly 8 bits byte
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 16:41, Tom C wrote:
> The point is this... How can Pal argue and assure us that Pentax is capable
> of/will produce the high end DSLR products we want, when they haven't
> produced one that he's willing to purchase?
Won't the 645 Digital "high end" enough?
http://www.living
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 15:57, Christian wrote:
> Oh, the irony of it all.. Pal, the champion for all things Pentax,
> never has anything good to say about the actual products. I, on the other
> hand, love the past products, but was tempted by the dark side due to lack
> of (in my crystal ball)
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 17:48, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> >>> The Ds Slimming Filter.
> >> You're kidding?
> > My thought, precisely.
>
> They're not kidding. This is one of the playback-post processing in-
> camera options. At least, if you use this kind of thing, it makes a
> copy of the origina
William Robb wrote:
Silver imaging is going to take a 100 year turn for the worse very
soon, to the point if you want to shoot the stuff, you'll be coating
your own.
...start a small businesses and sell on Ebay.
Joaquim
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 16:45, Joaquim Carvalho wrote:
> I'll report on it's fast glass slow focus performance when I put it on
> the ME-F tonight.
I finally had the time to test the ME-F with its fast 35-70mm F/2.8 AF
lens. I shot a roll of film and was very pleased:
AF is not fa
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 18:04, Charles Braswell Jr wrote:
> forever to process the image after the longer shutter speed elapsed.>
>
> I can't help with the question about the longer processing time after
> exposure, I haven't noticed it with my camera.
It's a noise reduction process, it takes roug
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 12:54, Stephen Moore wrote:
> So does one meter the scene before or after the
> ND is in place, i.e., adjust exposure for the
> desired medium tone, put the filter in place, and
> then slow the shutter by 2 stops? Or simply meter
> through the filter and use the desired shutte
Cotty wrote:
On 13/7/05, Mishka, discombobulated, unleashed:
stuff stuffed with cats: http://bonsaikitten.com/
That is pretty sick. Awful.
Don't worry, it's fake.
Joaquim
Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi Shel
how does a lens influence the saturation of a photo? By different coating?
just wondering ;-)
Light that hits the film/CCD not coming from the subject lowers overall
saturation and contrast. The quality of the black paint inside the lens
barrel influences satura
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 12:32, William Robb wrote:
> We've seen what you do to countries that you consider a threat.
or not
Andre Langevin wrote:
My A 24/2.8 doesn't work as it should on recent bodies because, I
suspect, the small metal bead does not protrude from the lens mount.
How can I repair this?
It's not hard to disassemble, just do not lose any parts.
I bought an 50mm A lens on Ebay that had both the A con
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Joaquim Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do we want the miniature version of IDE in our cameras???
I meant
And a 386 processor and a version of MS-DOS to go with it?
***in the camera*** (you have it in Canons)
Wel
David Savage wrote:
I've been having a small chuckle to myself reading this thread. It
seems that both sides (ie. D & Ds owner) are trying to convince you
to join their team :-)
Not me
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Joaquim Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- 9 larger soldering tabs on a PCB are a lot more reliable than 50 much
smaller ones, this is true both in the camera and in the card
- contact surface on an SD card is easier to
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 17:28, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> > I also have a DS but I had to give my opinion on this
>
> You already had. Why did you feel you had to riposte to my opinions?
I did it because I really couldn't agree with some of the things you
said, maybe I overdid it, sorry, I know some
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 16:54, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> Another option to just turn off all in-camera
> flash metering and set your exposure by [EMAIL PROTECTED] manually
> would also be nice.
Just put the camera in M mode
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 16:51, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> Image Quality.
The same
> Good lenses at reasonable prices. (I had never owned Pentax gear
> before the DS.)
The same
> Size and weight.
Nearly the same
> Ergonomics.
Are better on the D
> * I don't need multiple control wheels ... the s
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 16:02, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Better? Perhaps just different features. The faster buffer speed may, for
> some, make the istDs a "better" choice.
By "features" I meant user interface features, those are better on the
D, they could be improved on the DS if Pentax wanted to
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 15:12, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> This is for those of you who purchased an istDs: Why did you choose it over
> the istD? Availability? Price? Size? Features? Which features?
Availability, price, size, more reliable SD cards.
Featurewise the D is better (multiple WB memori
On Sun, 2005-07-10 at 23:48, Tom Reese wrote:
> Mr. Brooks, you have a far better chance of seeing me in bunny ears than
> with a digital camera.
>
> VIVA LA FILME!!!
The D or DS do not look or feel like digital cameras at all. Doesn't
your thumb search for the film advance lever when you use on
John Francis wrote:
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 09:13:02PM +0100, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
I have failed to post this for quite a while: I was watching the
Confederations Cup (football, for those who don't know) and was amazed
to see huge ads on the pitch for FujiFilm.
I thought it was dea
rther service, please let me know.
Best regards,
Rachael Katz
Katz Eye Optics
(916) 361 - 2143 Office
www.keoptics.com
Joaquim Carvalho wrote:
Sorry for the confusion I caused a while ago with the BCCing to the
list that made your filters fail.
Anyway, here is the reply from precision optics
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The D and DS models both have user interchangeable focusing screens.
Pentax does not offer a screen with a split image focusing aid ...
there are reasons for this. A German company, http://www.tekade.de,
offered such a screen (custom made by taking a screen from anot
Sorry for the confusion I caused a while ago with the BCCing to the list
that made your filters fail.
Anyway, here is the reply from precision optics. I'm now contacting
Keoptics and will keep you informed.
Dear Joaquim,
I am currently involved in a cooperative venture to produce manual
fo
asn't addressed to the list:
From: Joaquim Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2005/07/08 Fri PM 02:17:28 GMT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Joaquim Carvalho"
Subject: Pentax *ist DS / D
Dear William,
Thanks for the reply but I meant William Maxwell from Precision Optics,
who sells ultra-bright focus screens for TLRs like the Yashica-MAT 124
and the Rolleif
Dear William,
Do you also sell split image + microprism screens fot the *ist and *ist DS?
If so, please give me a price for 1, for 5 and for 10.
Regards,
Joaquim Carvalho
I like the way this list goes off-topic like a car going off the road
and then back on after a couple of miles and without any major bumps. I
guess photography opens people's minds.
Jon M wrote:
Can you upload some pictures of the disassembly?
http://jon.beigetower.org/photography/135/135exposed.jpg
No screws under the bezel.
Just noticed there's several small screws around the
diameter of the barrel just underneath the focusing
ring - close enough to the edge to
This is an auction I did for an average condition SFXn with a non
working pop-up flash.
I got 104.95 USD for it and very good feedback.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7517877667
Thibouille wrote:
That would be really, really kind of you.
I have a couple things to list but
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 01:56, Joaquim Carvalho wrote:
> When I receive the autofocus lens I'll report on how it works.
I just got the 35-70 F2.8 I bought on Ebay.
It's a fast K quality zoom lens made of real metal and plenty of clean
SMC covered glass. It has an electric motor inside
Take the best pictures you can. Try to make the item look good, not by
hiding detail but by good framing, good lighting and good color balance.
I normally shoot against a white background with +.5 exposure
compensation so the object will blend nicely into the white webpage
background. Don't put up
I remembered I have a K 135mm 3.5 :) I had a look, the link
between the focus ring and the part that does the focus can
not be at the front of the lens, it's also not under the rubber
focus ring cover so it must be to the back of the focusing scale.
Lokking at the http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/ site
Jon M wrote:
Just got that bezel off at last - there's no screws
under it. Anybody had one of these apart to know
exactly what I'm looking for here?
It's something that works as a clutch transmiting the rotation from
the focus ring to the focus helicoid.
This page explains how to do it on a
Brian Walters wrote:
I suspect that the commercial failure of the ME-F with its autofocus
lens is what set Pentax back in the autofocus race. After the ME-F
they went back to manual focus systems in the P series and were not
ready to meet the challenge of the Minolta 7000.
Can't understand why
Don Sanderson wrote:
Get all the foam off, just don't worry about the old
adhesive, it won't hurt anything and it requires using
solvent near the screen. That's scary! ;-(
Made it! It took over three hours and 20 wooden toothpicks, now I'll go
to sleep but I'm afraid I'll dream of sticky goo
Adjusting lens infinity focus is easy: you just untighten 4 screws and
adjust the lens maximum focus angle in relation to the focus ring
maximum angle.
The location of these 4 screws varies from lens to lens, I know that on
an M 50mm 1.7 they are on the front of the lens, around the element
behind
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 18:14, William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Joaquim Carvalho"
> Subject: Re: another survey
> >
> > How much would Bill Gates score?
> >
> Probably the same as Steve Jobs
Well, from my imagination I ente
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 16:56, Powell Hargrave wrote:
> >The two highest scores I've seen so far is one of 29.3 and one of just
> >over 20. Both Canadians. Not on this list.
How much would Bill Gates score?
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 14:09, Don Sanderson wrote:
> Don't be too picky about the old foam, just get it smooth
> enough to hold a new piece.
I'm afraid that by sharing lenses a tiny bit of that foam will end up on
the CCD of my DS.
I'm happy, I've been the whole morning playing with my
new ME-F
It was the first SLR autofocus camera, even if only one
lens was made for it, I never understood how some people
can say it wasn't.
It is a great camera: when using common lenses it is
exactly the same as an ME Super but with a v
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 19:23, Don Sanderson wrote:
> I hate having my questions drive the price up just because
> I know which ones to ask!
>
> Don
I have a trick for that: mix it with a couple of stupid questions, like
asking if an M lens can autofocus, the seller will always avoid showing
those
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 19:22, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
> Aye, as if everyone has one. This is not an MX you can have for 50
> quid or LX for 120
I could never find an LX for 120 USD, they are selling for a lot more on
Ebay.
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 15:34, Jens Bladt wrote:
> Just because I don't have no car (a have a shared car - 30 people sharing 5
> cars)
Interesting, can you share a picture of it?
Not too bad:
FOOD
1.3
MOBILITY
0.2
SHELTER
0.8
GOODS/SERVICES
1.1
TOTAL FOOTPRINT
3.4
PHOTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT ???
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS
:)
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 17:08, Juan Buhler wrote:
> Most street photographers in the last 10 years or so have taken the
> picture of two or maybe more people talking on a cellphone.
>
> This is my take on it:
>
> http://photoblog.jbuhler.com/index.php?showimage=160
> (ist D, A35-70/4)
>
> Just
> Steve Desjardins wrote:
>
> > I'll second that, although I bought my SP500 in 72. I sitll love the
> > needle.
> >
> > I am getting right fond of the DS, however.
If there was a way to add software modules to the *ist firmware like
on the Pentax EI-2000 and EI-200 Digita OS cameras the DS wo
Here you'll find a tool for doing that and a little more:
http://fedora.redhat.com/download/
...sorry, couldn't resist.
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 14:55, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Hi Gang ...
>
> I'm running Win XP (Home) on a machine that's a little more than a year
> old. It's been said that cleanin
Sorry to post again but I'm very intrigued with this, I do not have
experience with true macro lenses, I want your comments on this:
A guy that does lens repairs showed me a Pentax 35-70mm macro lens
modified to do 1.6:1 magnification without rings, more than any standard
Pentax lens can do. I
I like the MX best for objective reasons, comparing it with the *ist DS:
the viewfinder is a lot better, the shutter is faster, the camera is
lighter and easier to hold, it is more resistant and cheaper so I can
carry it around without being worried, battery changes are less
frequent, it has a spli
A guy that does lens repairs showed me a Pentax 35-70mm macro lens
modified to do 1.6:1 magnification without rings, I was curious about
the thing so I took it home to make some tests.
I took a close-up picture of the MX speed selector, please have a look,
any comments welcome.
http://x64.com/
MX
Joaquim
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Gang ...
Another Pentax list member and I were talking and comparing what gear we
now have. Over the years we've known one another a lot of cameras and
lenses have passed through our hands. While looking at my list I began
thinking which, of all my camera
I'm feeling happy. This morning I got the F 70-210mm 4.0-5.6 zoom I
bought on Ebay and did some preliminary tests. It is very very good:
- even wide open at 210mm it clearly outperforms the *ist CCD
- it focuses fast!
Boris Liberman wrote:
What is PESO ?
What is GESO ?
Picture Every So Often
Gallery Every So Often
I thought Peso some place in Mexico where some of you had been taking
pictures :)
...well, I'm new to this list
Anyone knows how? I tried and I'm confused, it only fires some of the times.
The bokeh is smoother on the near out of focus than on the far, the
Pentax 70-210mm does it the other way around. I actually like the out of
focus leaves though.
The second picture is stronger of course but for a reason, that women is
asking: "why the hell is that guy pointing that long lens at
Submissions for July start or end in July?
Jerome Reyes wrote:
http://www.kirschten.de/PUG/05jul
More than 1/2 of the shots were taken with an ist-D (over 60% if you count
the -Ds). Not sure if that's a first, but I found it interesting
nonetheless.
- Jerome
out
aiming through the viewfinder. This morning on the subway I took close
up pictures of interesting people just handling the camera as if it was
something else. Now I wish I had film in the camera.
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 17:13, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> On Jun 30, 2005, at 8:57 AM, Joaquim C
Do you want to give us the ebay auction number so we can comment on the
honesty of the seller?
Tim Øsleby wrote:
I have got the lens today. I was much exited (relax I'm not going to talk
dirty this time), even though it is a beauty. It came without lens cap and
rear cap, but never the less. No
Removing the mounting ring is not dificult but to fix anything you
probably need to get to the aperture blades and that is not easy for
someone with no experience. You also should practice with some cheaper
prime lens (like a 50mm F2.0), zoom lenses are a lot more complicated.
I also think you
Tim Øsleby wrote:
When using the DOF preview button at my Ds I hear a the same sound as usual,
the only thing happening is the regular sound, the image in the viewer
doesn’t change.
If you're not using the lens in the A mode you must put the camera
manual Manual mode, in any other mode the D
The equivalent to grain in the digital world for me is pixel noise, not
pixel edges. I too prefer the grain but probably for the same reasons I
prefer the crack noises of old LPs to MP3 compression distortion.
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 17:39, Bob Blakely wrote:
> Yes and no. Much of an image is the re
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 19:23, Joaquim Carvalho wrote:
> Set the aperture ring to F22. Push and release the diaphragm lever, how
> long did it take to close?
You can do this with the lens on the camera using the DOF preview button
Look at the diaphragm blades, is there any oil on them? There shouldn't
be.
The diaphragm has to close very quickly when the camera takes a picture.
Set the aperture ring to F22. Push and release the diaphragm lever, how
long did it take to close?
If there's oil on the blades a good camera repair s
I just received the brand new Minox B I bought cheap from Ebay and
I'm feeling very excited.
Checked the meter sensitivity against my DS and the Minox is
overexposing by a full F stop, or I guess the DS may be underexposing
a bit: without exposure compensation no areas on my photos ever reach
ful
Dictionary
pho·tog·ra·phy (fə-tŏg'rə-fē) pronunciation
n.
1. The art or process of producing images of objects on
photosensitive surfaces.
Ain't those illegal?
Jostein wrote:
Hi gang,
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/3479/display/3436741
Tell what you think.
Cheers,
Jostein
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
elps to keep prices down (there no huge prices like in
> the US) but selling is also more difficult.
>
> 2005/6/29, Joaquim Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Congratulations, that was a very good buy, the SFX by itself is worth
> > 100 Euros if you make the auction c
I feel the need to have a medium where I can see my photos with more
resolution than my computer screen.
I just remembered that some months ago I bought a cheap clogged Epson
3000 printer on Ebay (18" wide) *
Unclogging it and getting it running will be a lot of work and paper
in large formats
Congratulations, that was a very good buy, the SFX by itself is worth
100 Euros if you make the auction carefully.
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 18:13, Thibouille wrote:
> http://cgi.befr.ebay.be/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7525002092
>
> I don't care about SFX, 240FT.
> 70-210 is cool and 35-70 is a
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 14:55, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Thank you Mark, You are a prim(e)rose :-)
> >Have thanked you off list, but want to express my gratitude public too.
> >
> >I am impressed. Impressed by two things. First the thing that you have made
> >t
Ebay scams 101
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 10:49, Anthony Farr wrote:
> If you look at the sellers profile, you'd see that all feedback comments are
> like:
> "???**,,,??". To be fair, it could just be that eBay pages don't
> support oriental characters when they are being referred into occiden
On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 06:47, DagT wrote:
> Just to keep you going.
>
> http://www.foto.no/cgi-bin/bilder/vis_bilde.cgi?id=182348
On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 13:54, Chad wrote:
> I still have great reservations about shipping expensive gear
> overseas. Does anyone on this list have experience with such matters?
Just pack it well: put it inside a closed plastic bag, wrap it in
something soft then put it inside a hard cardboard box.
On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 13:39, William Robb wrote:
> > And yes the propose CA ordinance I mentioned was an anti-paparazzi one. I
> > do still wonder why it was the paparazzis fault that Diana's driver was
> > doing 100+ mph in city streets?
>
> Probably because the paparazzi were going 105+.
Let'
On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 12:42, frank theriault wrote:
> I wasn't defending the law, Tom, I was just saying that it would be
> easily enforceable is all.
No it wouldn't, people would just start using 85mm (the longest legal
lens) lenses on top of a few 1.7x (the maximum allowed) tele-converters
On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 12:37, Mark Roberts wrote:
> >Was this taken with the A 70-210mm with the 1.7x Pentax converter? Does
> >the converter it autofocus with that lens?
>
> The answer is "yes" to both questions.
>
> (And the Vivitar Series 1 is the third version, which *does* have the
> "A" sett
On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 11:27, Mark Roberts wrote:
> I did a very quick shoot in the garden last night. Light was getting low
> so I just got off a couple of shots at 210mm
> Here's a 100% crop (actual pixels):
> http://www.robertstech.com/temp/crop.jpg
> Given the relatively wide aperture, DOF and t
Joaquim Carvalho wrote:
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Joaquim Carvalho"
Subject: Re: Porto street shots (?)
Never been to Russia but I was in Poland last year and it is a
photographer's dream.
So they don't arrest you any more for pointin
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Joaquim Carvalho"
Subject: Re: Porto street shots (?)
Never been to Russia but I was in Poland last year and it is a
photographer's dream.
So they don't arrest you any more for pointing your camera at the
"wr
William Robb wrote:
OTOH, the USA is becoming eerily like old Soviet Russia from this
photographers perspective.
Never been to Russia but I was in Poland last year and it is a
photographer's dream.
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 15:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In the Porto shots, it is amusing that in this one the subject has spotted
> the sniper.
>
> http://x64.com/joaquim/photo/photo03/index-Pages/Image19.html
The father hasn't, he kept talking to the woman woman on the left, the
kid I don'
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 15:22, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> I wasn't going to comment on the photos, but since a discussion of sorts
> has opened up around them maybe I can add a thought or two. One of the
> biggest problems I see when using long lenses is that the photographer
> loses contact - or never
How acceptable is it to take pictures of people without asking for
permission?
On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 14:35, Joaquim Carvalho wrote:
> Some Porto street shots (?) taken with the SMC FA 80-320mm F4.5-5.6
> mostly at 320mm (480mm on the *ist DS) F6.8 1/500 200 ASA
>
> http://x64.com/j
> >
> > http://x64.com/joaquim/photo/photo03
> >
> > These people were minding their own business and I wouldn't want to
> > interrupt them,
> > this would not have been possible with a noisy eye level SLR and a lens
> > much shorter
> > than 200mm
>
> I'm getting Error 404 Not Found...
Sorry,
Some Porto street shots (?) taken with the SMC FA 80-320mm F4.5-5.6
mostly at 320mm (480mm on the *ist DS) F6.8 1/500 200 ASA
http://x64.com/joaquim/photo/photo03
These people were minding their own business and I wouldn't want to
interrupt them,
this would not have been possible with a noisy e
David Savage wrote:
The second thing I was drawn to, is that you managed to catch a single
drop of melted ice cream. For some weird reason I think that's pretty
neat.
Paul, you could make full size a crop of the drop of melted ice cream so
we can check that
it really is one and the quality
Daniel Liu wrote:
Weird, in some ways it's better than the DS. bigger screen, auto iso,
you can choose cont. AF in any non-preset mode.hope the ds gets a
firmware update.
We should push for that.
Does Pentax have any costumer feedback form?
Cory Papenfuss wrote:
How is that? I'll try it, but I'm just wondering how it's
easier... less distraction while you twiddle to find the "green hex?"
Right
-Cory
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Joaquim Carvalho wrote:
It's a lot easier to use the focus assist
It's a lot easier to use the focus assist with the central LED switched
off (an option on the settings menu)
I finally found a great online store with camera/lens repair parts ant
tools that stocks small ball bearings in every small diameter.
http://www.micro-tools.com/Merchant2/e_screws.htm
...from Morocco leather and leatherette to small screws and ball bearings
Anyone knows the exact diameter for:
-
1 - 100 of 187 matches
Mail list logo
