On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 13:39, William Robb wrote: > > And yes the propose CA ordinance I mentioned was an anti-paparazzi one. I > > do still wonder why it was the paparazzis fault that Diana's driver was > > doing 100+ mph in city streets? > > Probably because the paparazzi were going 105+.
Let's not believe in everything we're told: Below 100mph most bikes accelerate 2 times faster than any car, there's no way a car can escape from a bike inside a town. I don't believe a professional car driver would even try to run away from paparazzis on a bike.
