Hi Benoît, all,
I think that waiting 2 months with many nudges in the mailing list and
privately is sufficient as a clear evidence that "reasonable efforts" have been
made to remind authors.
As a remind, here is what is we supposed to do:
==
12. Have reasonable efforts been made to remind all
Dear Med,
We definitely need a refresh. Good catch. Count me as a document contributor
and reviewer. This matches well with what I have already contributed here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-boucadair-nmop-rfc3535-20years-later-07#section-4.10
Best wishes
Thomas
From: mohamed.bo
Hi Adrian,
Thank you.
Yes, turning 5706 into an I-D will be the next step. I will be sharing some
more guidance in the coming few days.
Cheers,
Med
De : Adrian Farrel
Envoyé : mardi 1 avril 2025 13:08
À : chen@zte.com.cn; BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
Cc : ops-...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.or
I know the WG LC has technically closed, but I wanted to record a comment as a
contributor and shepherd on Secure TACACS+ YANG. I feel the base, TACACS+
TLS13 document is ready pending some fixes from the authors from comments that
have already been raised. I look forward to seeing this implem
[Hello, WG. I’m playing catch up after 122 and some time off, so forgive me if
I’m behind on things.]
As Med reminded us, we have made a reasonable effort to determine if any IPR
applies to this draft, and so far, none has been reported. Therefore, we are
doing a two-week WG LC for
https://d
Hi all,
If Ran is prepared to do the hard work, I’d be OK to help shape the work.
Next step would be, I suppose, to turn 5706 into a new I-D that we can work
with.
Adrian
From: chen@zte.com.cn
Sent: 31 March 2025 02:21
To: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com
Cc: ops-...@ietf.org; op
On Aug 27, 2024, at 8:48 AM, Joe Clarke (jclarke)
wrote:
> The WG LC on this draft has concluded. There were several nit/typo comments
> raised and substantial concern about the collection of link type
> descriptions. Given that, I’d like to get some feedback from the authors as
> to how th
On Jan 30, 2025, at 7:00 AM, Joe Clarke (jclarke)
wrote:
> Hello, authors and contributors draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype (and the WG at
> large). Ahead of WG last call, we want to get an updated lay of the land in
> terms of IPR.
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identifie
On Apr 1, 2025, at 12:38 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
> *I* claim no IPR on the document.
Document*s*, plural. (All of them, Katie!) I've better things to do with my
time than care about having any copyright myself or taking out any patents on
this.
___
O
Hi Joe,
The new version with your comments addressed is now online. Please double check
and let me know if any other change is needed. Thanks.
Cheers,
Med
De : Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Envoyé : mardi 1 avril 2025 14:50
À : opsawg@ietf.org
Objet : [OPSAWG]Re: WG LC: TACACS+ TLS and its YANG module
Hi Benoît,
Thank you for the interest and also for digging into the practicalities.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
De : Benoit Claise
Envoyé : mardi 1 avril 2025 15:31
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET ;
ops-...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org; adr...@olddog.co.uk
Cc : Carlos Pignataro ; me
Objet :
Hi Med,
I re-read the document before answering.
My conclusion:
yes, it's time to update this document.
yes, I am ready to drive this, as this topic is close to my heart
A couple of high level points.
1. It's time to update this document, as it mainly focuses on MIB
developments
Examp
12 matches
Mail list logo
