On Aug 27, 2024, at 8:48 AM, Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> The WG LC on this draft has concluded. There were several nit/typo comments > raised and substantial concern about the collection of link type > descriptions. Given that, I’d like to get some feedback from the authors as > to how they want to proceed before moving this on for publication. Both the > chairs and AD have suggested the opsawg GitHub org to host a repo for > descriptions. For now, I guess they'll be hosted on tcpdump.org. I'm in the process of cleaning up the linktype I-D so that all the descriptions in it are short and, if there are no official standards that suffice, point them to descriptions on www.tcpdump.org. > On the IPR front, Guy, we’re still pending your response. The document also > lists several contributors, some of which I’m not sure we’d get any IPR > response even if we had current email addresses. That said, while these are > contributors to PCAP, they are not (insofar that I can tell) contributors to > this document. *I* claim no IPR on the document. (The notion that anybody would be worried about any IPR claims *I* has never even occurred to me!) I can't speak for anybody else; the document itself will be pointing at other sites, who can put up their own intellectual property statements if they want. _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
