I know the WG LC has technically closed, but I wanted to record a comment as a 
contributor and shepherd on Secure TACACS+ YANG.  I feel the base, TACACS+ 
TLS13 document is ready pending some fixes from the authors from comments that 
have already been raised.  I look forward to seeing this implemented.

Joe

From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jcla...@cisco.com>
Date: Thursday, March 6, 2025 at 08:48
To: opsawg@ietf.org <opsawg@ietf.org>
Subject: WG LC: TACACS+ TLS and its YANG module (draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13 
& draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang)
Hello, WG!  With the IPR polls concluded (no IPR has yet been disclosed), the 
authors feel that these two drafts are ready.  Therefore, we are kicking off a 
three-week combined WG LC for both 
draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13%20/>
 and 
draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang/>.
  As Med pointed out, this is likely one of the few times both a new protocol 
and its management model have been put forth at the same time.

Please review these two drafts and provide all comments on-list.  If you feel 
these are ready as-is, please state that as well.  We will also renew our DIR 
reviews of these documents. More good news, we have shepherds for both.  Med is 
acting as T+ TLS shepherd, and I will shepherd the YANG module.

To give everyone a good chance to review, the WG LC will conclude on March 27.

Joe and BenoƮt
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to