I know the WG LC has technically closed, but I wanted to record a comment as a contributor and shepherd on Secure TACACS+ YANG. I feel the base, TACACS+ TLS13 document is ready pending some fixes from the authors from comments that have already been raised. I look forward to seeing this implemented.
Joe From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jcla...@cisco.com> Date: Thursday, March 6, 2025 at 08:48 To: opsawg@ietf.org <opsawg@ietf.org> Subject: WG LC: TACACS+ TLS and its YANG module (draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13 & draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang) Hello, WG! With the IPR polls concluded (no IPR has yet been disclosed), the authors feel that these two drafts are ready. Therefore, we are kicking off a three-week combined WG LC for both draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13%20/> and draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang/>. As Med pointed out, this is likely one of the few times both a new protocol and its management model have been put forth at the same time. Please review these two drafts and provide all comments on-list. If you feel these are ready as-is, please state that as well. We will also renew our DIR reviews of these documents. More good news, we have shepherds for both. Med is acting as T+ TLS shepherd, and I will shepherd the YANG module. To give everyone a good chance to review, the WG LC will conclude on March 27. Joe and BenoƮt
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org