[opnfv-tech-discuss] [VES] Team Meeting Schedule

To all who want to participate in the VES project for Danube, here's an update. * I've had some difficulty finding an open slot for any regular meetings. I would like to propose that we plan to get on the agenda for the MANO WG calls as shown below, to have quick verbal updates as needed

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Barometer][VES] Mapping monitored source data to backend interface/model items

On the Barometer project (FKA SFQM) call today, I made the following suggestion that was welcomed by the team. Basically the Barometer project will be developing the "frontend" (i.e. agent) data source aspects of analytics collection (i.e. interfacing with hosts and VMs etc to collect analytics)

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [mano-wg] [MANO] Meeting #10 this Wendnesday Nov 2, 15.00 UTC (7.00 PDT)

y, November 01, 2016 7:48 AM To: opnfv-m...@lists.opnfv.org; Prakash Ramchandran ; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L ; denglin...@chinamobile.com; giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de; Ulas Kozat ; Yingjun Li ; artur.tyl...@canonical.com; dne...@redhat.com; sric...@gmail.com; bob.monk...@arm.com; christopher.pr..

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [availability] HA project weekly meeting

Looks like we had connectivity issues, but I just wanted to drop a note that I'll do my best to participate going forward as this project is addressing a gap I believe, and as noted there will be some tangential at least relation to the other projects I'm involved in (Copper, Models, VES) as par

[opnfv-tech-discuss] GTM Conflict at 14:00 UTC Wednesday?

Hi all, We were having the MANO WG meeting today at 7AM PST (14:00 UTC) using the https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/843517045 bridge, and got kicked out at about 15 past the hour. Just checking to see if there was some other project that started a meeting on the same bridge, e.g. due to a con

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Models Weekly Meeting A

TZOFFSETFROM:-0800 TZOFFSETTO:-0700 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3 END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT ORGANIZER;CN="SULLIVAN, BRYAN L":MAILTO:bs3...@att.com ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN='opnfv-tec h-disc...@lists.opnfv.or

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Summary of Weekly Technical Community Discussion Thursday Nov 3

As noted in the call, I will put the following item on the agenda for the next Models team meeting: discuss how/where to build a library of reference VNFs for functional and performance testing on OPNFV. I encourage anyone interested in that to join the next Models meeting on Monday: https://wi

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] GTM Conflict at 14:00 UTC Wednesday?

Prakash changed the meeting time to be more APAC friendly but we did not change the meeting page. Sorry! Now updated. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: David McBride [mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org] Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2016 1:38 PM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Cc: opnfv-tech-dis

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Models Weekly Meeting A

BEGIN:VEVENT ORGANIZER;CN="SULLIVAN, BRYAN L":MAILTO:bs3...@att.com ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN='opnfv-tec h-disc...@lists.opnfv.org':MAILTO:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org ATTENDEE;ROLE=OPT-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Dec Plugfest Planning

Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2016 3:42 AM To: 'Carella, Giuseppe' ; 'FRANCISCO JAVIER RAMON SALGUERO' ; artur.tyl...@canonical.com; Sridhar Ramaswamy ; 'Sripriya Seetharam' ; Arthur Berezin Cc: opnfv-tec

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VES] Team Meeting Schedule

17-045 Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: Yujun Zhang [mailto:zhangyujun+...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2016 1:49 AM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Cc: dong.wenj...@zte.com.cn Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VES] Team Meeting Schedule Which week day is t

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Colorado Colocated Plugfest/Hackfest - VNF Portability Scope

Hi all, During the TSC discussion today it became clear to me that we needed to move the "VNF Portability Scope" tests from the Plugfest to the collocated hackfest. The reason is that the intent of the VNF Portability tests is to help drive progress on the Models project goals for Danube, and t

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] Weekly Call

ahl; Jaggi, Manish; Gabor Halász; '杨艳'; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Subject: [barometer] Weekly Call When: Tuesday 8 November 2016 16:00-17:00 (UTC+00:00) Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London. Where: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/157141149 Hi Folks Let’s kick off a weekly call on Tuesdays to c

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Colorado Scenario Diagram

Hi all, As noted in the takeaways from the BOD/TSC joint session in Barcelona, I am working on creating a diagram that illustrates the Colorado scenario diversity. This should be a useful marketing tool for OPNFV. As a start, I updated the Colorado-Compact Table of Scenarios

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [mano-wg] [MANO] Meeting #11 agenda plus summary updates

Apologies for missing the call. Late night... late rise. Good set of notes/questions. Some comments below. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Prakash Ramchandran Sent: Wednesday, Novembe

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfvdocs] documentation landing page

This actually has been a thread of discussion and I think there is some effort to create a domain name for this as you describe. I can’t find the thread however right now. Anyone with a better memory or mail search tool? Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Models] 2016-Nov-14 Models Project Meeting #18

See https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/models/Models+Meetings Agenda: * Status of current work * YANG Models discussion with Peter Lee * Modeling approaches - collecting perspectives on * What ETSI is recommending in their current drafts and why * The role of YANG in service

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Models] 2016-Nov-14 Models Project Meeting #18

mber 14, 2016 4:05 PM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: RE: [Models] 2016-Nov-14 Models Project Meeting #18 All, Are we meeting at 8 or 9 Pacific? Thanks, Alex From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.op

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Barometer][VES] Mapping monitored source data to backend interface/model items

the concept in the table. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: Peter Lee [mailto:pe...@corenova.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2016 11:40 AM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Barometer][VES] Mapping monitored source data to bac

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Real-World CI/CD Topic for Hackfest

Here's a topic I brought up at the Infra meeting today, that I've added to the Hackfest Planning page https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Co-located+Plugfest-Hackfest+Planning+Page This was inspired by the OpenStack summit CI/CD Fishbowl session https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BCN-ops-ci-cd-wor

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] 答复: [functest] [yardstick] Client version can't support Newton - solution proposal

I would say that: 1) We should strive to directly leverage upstream clients directly, and specifically the python-openstackclient in all cases where it serves our need for the specific OPNFV system version. a. Exceptions do exist, but we will not help promote removal of those except

[opnfv-tech-discuss] MANO-Related Project Huddle at Hackfest

Hi all, I created a page where we can organize around the agenda and attendance at a 3-hour session on Thurs 8th (8:00-11:00) on MANO-related projects and cross-project topics. https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Colorado+Hackfest-MANO+project+huddle Depending upon the number of project members

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [mano-wg] [MANO] Meeting #13 todays Summary and next Meeting #14 - Nov 30th Wednesday 15 UTC

Hi all, As noted in the call today I added some info to the wiki to help us organize around the key themes we discussed today. We will defer discussion on Functest aspects until we have addressed these basic topics, or let the MANO-related projects consider the Functest aspects in the meantime.

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [MANO] New time for MANO WG Calls?

Hi all, Intel (Alex Vul) would like to get engaged in the MANO WG calls as we consider the architectural aspects as he's directly engaged in Open-O strategy including service/VNF modeling (which is a topic of the Models project but also touches on the roles/design of the MANO stack components).

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFVDOCS] Add a bug report button to OPNFV docs

I'd like to suggest that we figure out how to add something similar to the "report a bug" feature that OpenStack docs have. e.g. see http://docs.openstack.org/user-guide/cli-nova-configure-access-security-for-instances.html. I found that they referred to "--pub-key" in creating keypairs, vs the

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Feedback requested on test documentation example from Models

Hi all, In the test wg meetings I've mentioned the goals I have for optimizing the effort required to develop test documentation and coverage. In summary, * Tests should be self-documenting - no "test plan" should be needed beyond the entries in the test database and the comments in the

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Feedback requested on test documentation example from Models

lines to be “assert” lines also…) Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: David McBride [mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org] Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 10:12 AM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Cc: test...@lists.opnfv.org; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Feedback requested on test

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [doctor] doctor CI now available

Ryota, what was the quick hack for congress? On Dec 4, 2016, at 2:36 AM, Carlos Goncalves wrote: Hi Ryota, Really great job setting up the CI infrastructure and Doctor verify jobs! Thank you very much! I found a false positive. Jenkins verifies (+1) but the job have actually failed. The Doct

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Discussion for OpenRetriever

Xuan Jia, What we meant re current scenarios, are what we build and test in CI/CD, with various combinations of components and feature-specific code that adds to the basic scenario components. We would need to see what components you intend to add beyond Kuryr, to know if a new scenario was nee

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Canceled: Models Weekly Meeting A

BEGIN:VEVENT ORGANIZER;CN="SULLIVAN, BRYAN L":MAILTO:bs3...@att.com ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN='opnfv-tec h-disc...@lists.opnfv.org':MAILTO:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org ATTENDEE;ROLE=OPT-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [FuncTest] Test Database Swagger URI changed?

Hi all, I tried to verify the API URL http://testresults.opnfv.org/test/swagger/spec.html#!/spec/update which had been used earlier to update the database, but it appears not to be working now, using the credentials as shown on the page "Where can I find the documentation on the test API?

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [polestar]Meeting thursday at 11AM US EST

I didn’t see a response to this an it seems the meeting did not start (“waiting for organizer”) – just checking. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Margaret Chiosi Sent: Wednesday, Janu

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Danube Status - ready to test in labs?

Hi all Fuel team members, I'm looking for some guidance on how to track Fuel status for Danube and how to contact the Fuel team other than email, which we all have too much of. I see some info at https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/fuel/Fuel+Opnfv but it seems that the irc channel referenced (opnfv-

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Danube Status - ready to test in labs?

. as I have been using will this work o Three Intel NUC i7 machines with two NICs, wake-on-lan + PXE boot (no IPMI), 16GB memory Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: Serg Melikyan [mailto:smelik...@mirantis.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 7:59 AM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Cc: opnfv-tech-dis

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Community] Inputs to 2nd Multi-SDO-OpenSource Info Modeling Workshop uploaded

Hi all, The inputs to the 2nd Multi-SDO - Open Source Info Modeling Workshop have been uploaded to the OPNFV wiki at https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/COM/Multi-SDO-Open+Source+Information+Modeling+Collaboration. In OPNFV we will be using that page and the linked pages for the action items to tra

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [polestar] Reminder of call this thursday 11AM US EST - also send me suggestions on when to do a F2F

OPNFV Hackfest in April (France). Thru May that’s about it, then there’s the OPNFV Summit in June (Beijing). Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Margaret Chiosi Sent: Tuesday, January 10,

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Danube Status - ready to test in labs?

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 9:58 AM To: Serg Melikyan Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Danube Status - ready to tes

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [polestar] Reminder of call this thursday 11AM US EST - also send me suggestions on when to do a F2F

The OPNFV Hackfest is still in discussion, but at Orange labs in Paris or north of Paris (can’t recall the city). Morgan will know. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: Pierre Lynch [mailto:ply...@ixiacom.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 6:48 AM To: Ash Young Cc: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L ; o

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV] VNF on boarding: Q&A Functest versus orchestrator projects

; dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L ; jose.laus...@ericsson.com; michael.pa...@tu-berlin.de; lorenzo.tomas...@fokus.fraunhofer.de; huang.leib...@zte.com.cn; Thajudheen Rajak Subject: RE: [OPNFV] VNF on boarding: Q&A Functest versus orchestrator projects I experienced t

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Danube Status - ready to test in labs?

is is an input, not output) - at least I can't find it. Any guidance? Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: Michael Polenchuk [mailto:mpolenc...@mirantis.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 8:03 AM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Updated Invitation: OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call @ Weekly from 8am to 9am on Thursday (CDT) (m...@linuxfoundation.org)

.org; hkirk...@linuxfoundation.org; jonne.soini...@nokia.com; prodip@hpe.com; john.v.he...@intel.com; zhangyujun+...@gmail.com; bob.monk...@arm.com; margaretchiosi.o...@gmail.com; FORD, TOBY; pyeg...@juniper.net; christopher.pr...@ericsson.com; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; Raymond Paik; dne...@redhat

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Danube Status - ready to test in labs?

chuk [mailto:mpolenc...@mirantis.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 11:35 PM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Danube Status - ready to test in labs? On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 9:23 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L mailto:bs3...@att.com>> wro

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Updated Invitation: OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call @ Weekly from 8am to 9am on Thursday (CDT) (m...@linuxfoundation.org)

IVAN, BRYAN L; Raymond Paik; dne...@redhat.com; sandra.l.riv...@intel.com; ulrich.kle...@huawei.com; cyo...@clearpathnet.com; fbroc...@cisco.com; anthony.so...@huawei.com; dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org; WRIGHT, STEVEN A; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; paul...@emc.com; dick.c...@ztetx.com Sub

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Updated Invitation: OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call @ Weekly from 8am to 9am on Thursday (CDT) (m...@linuxfoundation.org)

For some reason it was showing up for me at 6AM PST – Min reset the invite and it’s now 8AM PST. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: Ash Young [mailto:a...@yunify.org] Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 7:31 AM To: Ulrich Kleber ; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Cc: m...@linuxfoundation.org; h

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Updated Invitation: OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call @ Weekly from 8am to 9am on Thursday (CDT) (m...@linuxfoundation.org)

| AT&T From: Margaret Chiosi [mailto:margaretchiosi.o...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 9:09 AM To: Ash Young Cc: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L ; paul...@emc.com; john.v.he...@intel.com; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; FORD, TOBY ; dick.c...@ztetx.com; WRIGHT, STEVEN A ; m...@linuxfoun

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [yardstick] Document: How to run Yardstick in a local environment

Thanks, Tapio, this is helpful. It would be good to post on the yardstick wiki at least. We need more such user/developer stories contributed. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T -Original Message- From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnf

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Models Weekly Meeting A

Hi all, Agenda for today is that the Gigaspaces team will give us an update on Cloudify and Aria. That will help us get those tools better integrated into the Models tests etc. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T -Original Appointment- From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Sent: Monday, July 18, 201

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Models Weekly Meeting A

us get those tools better integrated into the Models tests etc. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T -Original Appointment- From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 10:12 AM To: 'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org' Cc: 'Dan Westerberg'; 'Tal Barenboim&#

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [VES][Barometer] Talk Proposal for ONS and OpenStack Boston

Hi Maryam, I'm planning to propose a talk for ONS prior to Jan 21, and to OpenStack Boston a little later, around the following. I'd be happy to work with you and the Barometer team to create and present the talk/demos. Comments are welcome! OPNFV Telemetry: VNF Event Stream (VES) and Barometer

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Models] Talk Proposal for ONS

Hi all, For ONS and OpenStack I plan to submit a Models talk proposal along these lines. Comments welcome! Model-Driven NFV in OPNFV Danube A key goal for the NFV transformation is that everything possible should be automated through model-based abstractions that enable orchestration and manag

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] congress support in compass4nfv

) how to access the POD. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: huangxiangyu [mailto:huangxiang...@huawei.com] Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2016 5:54 PM To: huangxiangyu ; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L ; Carlos Goncalves Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] congress s

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Models Weekly Meeting A

No, we didn't record the session. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: Beierl, Mark [mailto:mark.bei...@dell.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 12:45 PM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Models Weekly Meeting A Hello,

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Danube Status - ready to test in labs?

Resending, as I have not yet see a clarification of the fields in the dea-pod-override.yaml and dha.yaml files. I need this in order to setup our PODs to test under Fuel for the Copper, Models, and VES project. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Sent: Thursday, Januar

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VES][Barometer] Talk Proposal for ONS and OpenStack Boston

Hi Maryam, I will submit the proposal below by the deadline this Sat. If you or someone on your team will be able to co-develop/present this with me, let me know so I can include that info also. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 3:58 P

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VES][Barometer] Talk Proposal for ONS and OpenStack Boston

OK, great - submitted. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: Tahhan, Maryam [mailto:maryam.tah...@intel.com] Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 1:21 AM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: RE: [VES][Barometer] Talk Proposal for ONS and OpenStack Boston Hi Brya

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Compass] RE: congress support in compass4nfv

be preferable. My test environment is as described below. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 6:12 AM To: 'huangxiangyu' ; Carlos Goncalves Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] congress support

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Apex] Danube install help

Hi Apex team, I want to get going on installing Apex in a virtual or non-HA/3-node (jumphost, control, compute) environment, for Copper, Models, VES. I need to know how the install process has changed for Danube, e.g. pre-reqs and command line options. Here is the process I used for Colorado vi

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Apex] Danube install help

One other thing I forgot in the list added below. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2017 4:33 PM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: [Apex] Danube install help Hi Apex team, I want to get going on installing Apex in a virtual or

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Apex] Danube install help

le. No package python-markupsafe-0.23-9.el7.centos.src.rpm available. No package python3-ipmi-0.3.0-1.noarch.rpm available. Error: Nothing to do [bryan@opnfv apex]$ Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2017 4:36 PM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Models Weekly Meeting A

as many installers as I have time/resources to verify. Other topics welcome. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T -Original Appointment- From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 10:12 AM To: 'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org' Cc: 'Dan Westerberg'; &#x

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Models Weekly Meeting A

, which e.g. will be useful if you are testing multiple versions of Openstack and don't want to mess up your host, or use virtualenv. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T _____ From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 7:58 AM To: 'opnf

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Models Weekly Meeting A

(glaring error in my notes below, corrected!) You should be able to run these tests on Devstack (it previously say "should not" for some freudian reason). Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T _____ From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Sent: Monday, January 23, 2

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Apex] Danube install help

need to wakeup a specific (or all) nodes at that time, and proceed when the user hits enter. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T -Original Message- From: Tim Rozet [mailto:tro...@redhat.com] Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 7:35 AM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.or

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]Thoughts on Report Authentication

The solution you propose (sending direct to the database over a secure connection) is the best solution. It does require however these additional capabilities: 1) For users that want to assess how their system stacks up without having the data published to the OPNFV DB (“dry run”), there n

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Apex] POD needed for Apex testing

Tim and Dan, Do you have any PODs or servers (as with the previous POD7 server) that the Copper, Models, and VES projects can use for testing with Apex? I've tried several times to get Centos 7 installed in my lab but it's always hanging on "yum update" (I've tried three times now, and there's

[opnfv-tech-discuss] FW: Checking in the the Policytest project in OPNFV.

Hi all, If there are no objections, it’s proposed that the PolicyTest project be terminated, as there has been no activity since its formation. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: Raymond Paik [mailto:rp...@linuxfoundation.org] Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 9:28 AM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Danube Status - ready to test in labs?

boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 2:44 PM To: Michael Polenchuk Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Danube Status - ready to test in labs? Resending, as I have not

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Models] vHello_Tacker pre-reqs

Trinath, I saw a note on the #opnfv-models channel but did not get a chance to respond * bryan_att: hi, for running VHello_Tacker.sh, what is the pre-required environment ? For Danube, I am still updating vHello_Tacker.sh and the related tacker-setup.sh to Newton. They will be intended

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Danube Status - ready to test in labs?

Sullivan | AT&T From: Michael Polenchuk [mailto:mpolenc...@mirantis.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 6:03 AM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Danube Status - ready to test in labs? Hi Bryan, You could use Fuel UI to a

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]L3VPN for dovetail area

I posted some comments in gerrit. Here are the main points I think we need alignment on: 1) All proposed dovetail included tests will be added one-by-one, in a separate commit. 2) The commit will include a link to the details of the test case (script or otherwise what I would use to

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]L3VPN for dovetail area

More comments inline. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: Wenjing Chu [mailto:wenjing@huawei.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 3:00 PM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L ; Pierre Lynch ; Jose Lausuch Cc: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]L3VPN for dovetail

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]L3VPN for dovetail area

More inline. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: Wenjing Chu [mailto:wenjing@huawei.com] Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 12:30 PM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L ; Pierre Lynch ; Jose Lausuch Cc: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]L3VPN for dovetail area Hi Bryan

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] JIRA updated with labels for Testarea, Testcase

Hi all, Per the dovetail call today I have update JIRA and applied the following labels so we can begin managing the test areas and test case ingestion/review process in JIRA, via the Kanban board https://jira.opnfv.org/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=147&projectKey=DOVETAIL * Epics a

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Models Weekly Meeting A

I am traveling today so no Models meeting. Still working on getting an OPNFV Danube deploy going, as pre-req to completing Danube work. Any offers of resources (PODs, dev support) are appreciated. Models Weekly Meeting A Scheduled: Monday, Jan 30, 2017 from 8:00 AM to 9:00 AM Location: https://

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [TSC] Bin will stand-in today

I am traveling and not able to join the TSC or Release call. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [SDNVPN]{Fuel] Fuel virtual install

Hi SDNVPN and Fuel teams, I am trying to do a Fuel virtual install. This is not documented in the Fuel docs, but I was referred to the doc http://artifacts.opnfv.org/sdnvpn/colorado/docs/userguide/feature.userguide.html#preparing-the-host-to-install-fuel-by-script by Jose. I have some question

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SDNVPN]{Fuel] Fuel virtual install

should be "cp -r" Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 10:40 AM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: [SDNVPN]{Fuel] Fuel virtual install Hi SDNVPN and Fuel teams, I am trying to do a Fuel virtual install. This is not docu

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Proposal to shift strategy discussions from Polestar to the Tech Community calls

On the Polestar call today I floated the idea, which was well received (there were four of us on the call), that going forward we expand the audience for the strategy discussions that the Polestar group was supposed to be driving, by moving the detailed strategy discussions (at least) to the wee

[opnfv-tech-discuss] FW: Proposal to shift strategy discussions from Polestar to the Tech Community calls

On Behalf Of SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 5:54 PM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Proposal to shift strategy discussions from Polestar to the Tech Community calls On the Polestar call today I floated the idea, which was well received (th

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Working with OpenStack test cases in the CVP

+1 to this approach. I recommend to use upstream verification/certification suites/tools in as much a black-box way as possible. We don’t need to take the time/effort to package our own set of tests (and maintain that packaging) if those tests are coming from upstream. Same goes for other upstre

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][danube] Danube release status

Clarification: “no more development activity for Danube release features”. That does not mean however that features which are targeted to work on Danube cannot continue to be developed, just that per the convention they are not part of the “release”. Due to issues with the late availability of

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] A survey regarding Open Source VNF Catalogue

You can reference the info collected on the Models wiki: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/models/References, and on the Functest wiki at https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/functest/List+Of+VNFs As part of the objective of the Models project, we are building a list of VNFs that meet the following crit

[opnfv-tech-discuss] docs.opnfv.org style

Hi, It seems there has been some change in the look & feel (style) of the docs posted at docs.opnfv.org. What process is underway to review and approve these proposed changes: - The nativation layout and style of the Copper project docs has changed from the RTD style to something else

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] docs.opnfv.org style

"navigation" not "nativation" ;-) Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2017 8:17 AM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: docs.opnfv.org style Hi, It seems there has been some change in the look & feel (s

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Join Mailing List

Welcome, Joe. AFAIK all you need to do is subscribe to the lists at lists.opnfv.org. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: opnfv-users-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-users-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Krystofik, Joe Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 8:07 AM To: opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] [Announce] OPNFV E-release naming

Electric: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_River Edison: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edison_River Eden: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eden_Creek Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: opnfv-tsc-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tsc-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Raymond Paik Sent

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [release] E-release schedule

“Today I spend > 80% of my time getting OPNFV to run” +1000 I think this is the #1 challenge facing OPNFV. It’s the primary driver for some strategic shifts in our approach to OPNFV and its technical direction this year: - Move quickly toward a containerized control plane that is highly

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Models] Pike PTG this week - no meeting for Models

Hi all, This week I am at the OpenStack PTG and not able to chair the Models call. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] Inputs for Dovetail Principles and Priorities

Hi all, To help us move forward on Dovetail I've suggested that we first take a step back and consider/agree upon some basics that will I think help us focus the Dovetail effort more effectively. https://techdiscuss.opnfv.org/t/organizing-dovetail/82 was started for that overall goal. Because

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Models Weekly Meeting A

:52 AM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L ; 'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org' Subject: RE: Models Weekly Meeting A Hi Bryan- I have installed Devstack Newton release with proposed local.conf. When I run the tacker-setup.sh as below, I get the following error. stack@openstack-dev:/opt/tacker$ sudo b

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Models] 2017-Feb-27 Models Project Meeting #26 agenda

The Infra group has rescheduled their calls to conflict with the Models meeting so hopefully we won’t lose too many attendees. We will need to consider moving the Models meeting as I need also to attend the Infra meetings. 2017-Feb-27 Models Project Meeting #26 Agenda: * stable/danube branc

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [JOID] Can JOID Installer run in a VM?

Hi Narinder and other JOID project members: In the Infra call today I took the action to check with you whether the JOID installer can be run in a VM on the jumphost. This is a goal of the Infra team so we can help ensure some strategic things for CI/CD: - Jumphosts are stable, i.e. in

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Models Weekly Meeting A

op I had to do a couple of extra things as noted at https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/bryan-devstack to enable docker container to devstack VM traffic. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 7:11 AM To: 'Trinath Somanchi' ; 'opnfv-tech-di

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Models Weekly Meeting A

M To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L ; 'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org' Subject: RE: Models Weekly Meeting A I was struck at the heat "bash vHello_tacker.sh setup". Line by line debugging the issues. / Trinath From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L [mailto:bs3...@att.com] Sent: Tuesday, Feb

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [JOID] Can JOID Installer run in a VM?

that the VM can attach to. Exactly how to do that (setup bridges and VM NIC interfaces which connect to them, for all host interfaces) will be investigated. Any hints are much appreciated! Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 8:44 AM To: opnfv-

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Models Weekly Meeting A

do some extra setup as noted at https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/bryan-devstack. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 7:52 AM To: 'Trinath Somanchi' ; 'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org' Subject: RE: Models Weekly Meeting A

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Models Weekly Meeting A

c/29711/ Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T From: Trinath Somanchi [mailto:trinath.soman...@nxp.com] Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2017 5:51 PM To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L ; 'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org' Subject: Re: Models Weekly Meeting A Hi Bryan- Do we really need to have Devsta

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Tacker uplift to keystone v3

FYI, as deployed for the Models tests, the Tacker service is working fine on Danube. See the test vHello_Tacker.sh (https://git.opnfv.org/models/tree/tests/vHello_Tacker.sh) and the install utility it uses (tacker-setup.sh: https://git.opnfv.org/models/tree/tests/utils/tacker-setup.sh) which ma

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] Continuing the project graduation discussions

I added my comments to that page: I think we need to revisit the https://www.opnfv.org/software/technical-project-governance/project-lifecycle expectations 2.5 years into OPNFV. IMO, in a rapidly evolving industry, projects will come and go, morph and merge, both in OPNFV and upstream. In fact,

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] Update

FYI, I submitted a patch to move the ves_plugin to the v3 of the VES API. https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/29959/ We have rebased the VES code for Danube on the latest AT&T release on github and integrated the current version of the ves_plugin. But we need the plugin to use the "v3" API endpo

  1   2   3   >