I added my comments to that page:
I think we need to revisit the 
https://www.opnfv.org/software/technical-project-governance/project-lifecycle 
expectations 2.5 years into OPNFV. IMO, in a rapidly evolving industry, 
projects will come and go, morph and merge, both in OPNFV and upstream. In 
fact, if we walk the "working upstream" talk, projects in OPNFV really should 
be quite short-lived (a couple of releases) before they are upstreamed fully, 
leaving behind only perhaps some deployment/test scripts as needed for the 
OPNFV CI/CD system, and some documents which describe what the project was 
about and where further development of it lives. Exceptions to this expectation 
for "succeed and disappear" may be the truly integration-focused projects (e.g. 
OpenStack distro-centered installers) and test projects that span upstream 
projects.

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT&T

From: opnfv-tsc-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tsc-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Raymond Paik
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 9:19 AM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tsc] Continuing the project graduation discussions

All,

Wanted to follow-up via email in order to save sometime during the TSC call 
tomorrow 
(https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TSC#TSC-March6,2017)..<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_meetings_TSC-23TSC-2DMarch6-2C2017-29..&d=DQMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OrbtGCluczz9awEKz9Fv7g&m=VqAXZ6YWr807EgwrEiOhHc_AplZZGIxhwRO-RjsQHoY&s=FgQCusblpotAwdbFpL81oCyCfTQRh8w9LnrRuVMXiOY&e=>..

Besides a single comment on the wiki page 
(https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Graduation+review+discussions<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_PROJ_Graduation-2Breview-2Bdiscussions&d=DQMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OrbtGCluczz9awEKz9Fv7g&m=VqAXZ6YWr807EgwrEiOhHc_AplZZGIxhwRO-RjsQHoY&s=H8JHb1qDDrm32a5EmJblzKGzGVzOAknKACmLACPmegk&e=>),
 I don't believe there were other feedback so here's my recommendation.

Based on past discussions, I believe there's consensus that graduation reviews 
are good ways of recognizing mature projects that can server as role models for 
the rest of the community.  In addition, I don't think there's any need to make 
any modifications to the graduation review process in the current OPNFV Project 
Lifecycle 
(https://www.opnfv.org/software/technical-project-governance/project-lifecycle<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.opnfv.org_software_technical-2Dproject-2Dgovernance_project-2Dlifecycle&d=DQMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OrbtGCluczz9awEKz9Fv7g&m=VqAXZ6YWr807EgwrEiOhHc_AplZZGIxhwRO-RjsQHoY&s=WFUsFzmv1ez4gUxcHXSuxYc5MzFuV6X6jQHUoP6oFcQ&e=>).
  There was a discussion on whether a project team can step forward for a 
graduation review or if there should be a nomination from the community, but I 
think either way will work.

Let me know if you have any other questions/comments.  If not, we could 
probably reach a quick consensus on the call tomorrow.

Thanks,

Ray

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 10:39 PM, Raymond Paik 
<rp...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:rp...@linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:
All,

I don't think I managed to follow-up after our discussions at the Plugfest on 
graduation reviews.  I created a wiki page summarizing my notes at 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Graduation+review+discussions<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_PROJ_Graduation-2Breview-2Bdiscussions&d=DQMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OrbtGCluczz9awEKz9Fv7g&m=VqAXZ6YWr807EgwrEiOhHc_AplZZGIxhwRO-RjsQHoY&s=H8JHb1qDDrm32a5EmJblzKGzGVzOAknKACmLACPmegk&e=>
  If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to add them to the 
comments section on the wiki page or reply to this email.

I also had a chance to talk to a few OpenDaylight community members last week 
and confirmed that projects that passed graduation/promotion reviews in their 
community serve as "role models" for other members of the community.

I can bring this up during the TSC call tomorrow if we have time...

Thanks,

Ray

_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Reply via email to