"navigation" not "nativation" ;-) Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T
From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2017 8:17 AM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: docs.opnfv.org style Hi, It seems there has been some change in the look & feel (style) of the docs posted at docs.opnfv.org. What process is underway to review and approve these proposed changes: - The nativation layout and style of the Copper project docs has changed from the RTD style to something else - not nearly as user-friendly or readable - The font colors used on the section pages e.g. http://docs.opnfv.org/en/latest/featureprojects.html are too faint. The red strains the eye as well as the light grey in the text ala http://docs.opnfv.org/en/latest/submodules/copper/docs/design/introduction.html. - The overall doc style is much less desirable than the RTD theme, e.g. compare the above to http://artifacts.opnfv.org/copper/docs/design/index.html - Having to navigate the outline by page forward/back is less usable than having the outline always on the left as in http://artifacts.opnfv.org/copper/docs/design/index.html I believe projects should be able to specify the look & feel / style aspects of how their documentation is presented. In the Copper, Models, and VES case we intend to publish using the RTD theme as in http://artifacts.opnfv.org/copper/docs/design/index.html. This needs to be supported somehow at http://docs.opnfv.org Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
