On ven, 2008-07-04 at 08:16 +0200, Alfred E. Heggestad wrote:
> Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Thanks a lot for your comments.
> >
>
> would it be possible to use the program called `ketchup' to download
> kernel sources?
>
>http://www.selenic.com/ketchup
Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
> I know that what I say usually is ignored :D But I like to flood this ml
> with stupid(?) ideas.
>
> The actual OpenWRT considers kernels 2.6.X.Y and 2.6.X.(Y+1) as a very
> different kernels downloading the full sources for both. I think that
> th
On gio, 2008-07-03 at 21:18 +0100, j t wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Claudio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > 2008/7/3 Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> On gio, 2008-07-03 at 13:14 +0100, j t wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Claudio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> 2008/7/3 Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On gio, 2008-07-03 at 13:14 +0100, j t wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > On gio, 2008-07-03 at
Hi
2008/7/3 Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On gio, 2008-07-03 at 13:14 +0100, j t wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On gio, 2008-07-03 at 12:59 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
>> >> -ENOPATCH ?
>> >
>> > I don't unde
Detto... fatto!
This is my proposed patch (just a proof of concept):
http://repo.or.cz/w/openwrt_comio.git?a=commitdiff;h=2cbc4b18271903b77896e1d1db279c3a1675b904
The md5 values should be recalculated for kernels 2.6.x and for the
patches 2.6.x.y (Now I just set MD5 to empty string).
ciao
luig
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On gio, 2008-07-03 at 13:14 +0100, j t wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On gio, 2008-07-03 at 12:59 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
>> >> -ENOPATCH
On gio, 2008-07-03 at 13:14 +0100, j t wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On gio, 2008-07-03 at 12:59 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> >> -ENOPATCH ?
> >
> > I don't understand. What do you mean?
> >
> See:
> http://www.opengroup.org/onl
On gio, 2008-07-03 at 14:10 +0200, Jan Willies wrote:
...
> >>> These optimizations should be applied also to gcc and uclibc and any
> >>> other package that provides diff between versions.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks a lot for your comments.
> >>
> >> -ENOPATCH ?
> >>
> >>
> >
> > I don't understand.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On gio, 2008-07-03 at 12:59 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
>> -ENOPATCH ?
>
> I don't understand. What do you mean?
>
See:
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/95399/basedefs/errno.h.html
HTH
___
Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini wrote:
> On gio, 2008-07-03 at 12:59 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
>> On Thursday 03 July 2008 11:01:17 Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>>
>>> I know that what I say usually is ignored :D But I like to flood this ml
>>> with stupid(?) ideas.
>>>
>>> The actu
On gio, 2008-07-03 at 12:59 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Thursday 03 July 2008 11:01:17 Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> >
> > I know that what I say usually is ignored :D But I like to flood this ml
> > with stupid(?) ideas.
> >
> > The actual OpenWRT considers kernels 2.6
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -ENOPATCH ?
I want that on a t-shirt. In big letters.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-de
On Thursday 03 July 2008 11:01:17 Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
> I know that what I say usually is ignored :D But I like to flood this ml
> with stupid(?) ideas.
>
> The actual OpenWRT considers kernels 2.6.X.Y and 2.6.X.(Y+1) as a very
> different kernels downloading the full s
Hi All,
I know that what I say usually is ignored :D But I like to flood this ml
with stupid(?) ideas.
The actual OpenWRT considers kernels 2.6.X.Y and 2.6.X.(Y+1) as a very
different kernels downloading the full sources for both. I think that
this is not a good approach because this is time and
15 matches
Mail list logo