On gio, 2008-07-03 at 12:59 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Thursday 03 July 2008 11:01:17 Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> >
> > I know that what I say usually is ignored :D But I like to flood this ml
> > with stupid(?) ideas.
> >
> > The actual OpenWRT considers kernels 2.6.X.Y and 2.6.X.(Y+1) as a very
> > different kernels downloading the full sources for both. I think that
> > this is not a good approach because this is time and band expensive.
> >
> > An idea should be to download the full sources 2.6.X kernels and just
> > the patches 2.6.X.1, 2.6.X.2, ... 2.6.X.Y to cover the kernels with
> > version like 2.6.X.Y. The result will be a gain in terms of band and
> > time utilization.
> >
> > I think that to achieve this the download perl and make scripts should
> > be made more smart than actual versions
> >
> > These optimizations should be applied also to gcc and uclibc and any
> > other package that provides diff between versions.
> >
> > Thanks a lot for your comments.
>
>
> -ENOPATCH ?
>
>
I don't understand. What do you mean?
luigi
--
______ Luigi Mantellini
.'______'. R&D - Software
(.' '.) Industrie Dial Face S.p.A.
( :=----=: ) Via Canzo, 4
('.______.') 20068 Peschiera Borromeo (MI), Italy
'.______.' Tel.: +39 02 5167 2813
Fax: +39 02 5167 2459
Ind. Dial Face Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.idf-hit.com GPG fingerprint: 3DD1 7B71 FBDF 6376 1B4A
B003 175F E979 907E 1650
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
