Hey,
I believe this patch can be merged as is. According to Sricharan R. [1]:
"It is [sleep clk] derived from a 48M wifi refclk
48M wifi ref clk -> [/2 divider] -> [/750 divider] -> sleep_clk (32000)"
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/comment/22721613/
пт, 17 мая 2
пт, 17 мая 2019 г., 23:18 Christian Lamparter :
> On Wednesday, May 15, 2019 9:35:28 PM CEST Petr Štetiar wrote:
> > Павел [2019-05-15 22:14:41]:
> >
> > > Not a problem, actually, but I've been suggested to squash them :)
> > > https://github.com/openwrt/op
clock-frequency = <32000>;
> > + #clock-cells = <0>;
> > + };
>
> On Thursday, 16 May 2019 13:18:14 CEST Павел wrote:
> [...]
> > > And maybe some of these guys also know how to find the ipq40xx clock
> > > controller
чт, 16 мая 2019 г., 13:05 Sven Eckelmann :
> On Wednesday, 15 May 2019 19:16:51 CEST Павел wrote:
> [...]
> > > Is there any particular reason why
> > > this
> > > shouldn't be sent upstream and then backported to OpenWrt?
> > >
> >
> > T
ср, 15 мая 2019 г., 22:35 Petr Štetiar :
> Павел [2019-05-15 22:14:41]:
>
> > Not a problem, actually, but I've been suggested to squash them :)
> > https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/2043#issuecomment-491581897
>
> ok, thanks for the background, but still, sq
ср, 15 мая 2019 г., 21:55 Petr Štetiar :
> Павел [2019-05-15 20:35:38]:
>
> > This patchset consists of 2 patches with different authors that I have
> > squashed into 1. How should I preserve authorship in this case?
>
> Just add them as separate patches, exactly as p
ср, 15 мая 2019 г., 19:02 Petr Štetiar :
> Pavel Kubelun [2019-05-14 16:42:20]:
>
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++
> b/target/linux/ipq40xx/patches-4.14/091-ipq40xx-add-support-for-secondary-cores-bringup.patch
> > @@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
> > +From 6126701397fa6c884fd78453d995e49df91a566a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
ср, 15 мая 2019 г., 18:59 Petr Štetiar :
> Pavel Kubelun [2019-05-14 16:42:19]:
>
> > diff --git
> a/target/linux/ipq40xx/patches-4.14/090-ipq40xx-fix-high-resolution-timer.patch
> b/target/linux/ipq40xx/patches-4.14/090-ipq40xx-fix-high-resolution-timer.patch
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0
ср, 15 мая 2019 г., 19:11 Petr Štetiar :
> Pavel Kubelun [2019-05-14 16:42:17]:
>
> > diff --git
> a/target/linux/ipq40xx/patches-4.14/073-qcom-ipq4019-fix-cpu0-s-qcom-saw2-reg-value.patch
> b/target/linux/ipq40xx/patches-4.14/073-qcom-ipq4019-fix-cpu0-s-qcom-saw2-reg-value.patch
> > index d72e3d
ср, 15 мая 2019 г., 18:55 Petr Štetiar :
> Pavel Kubelun [2019-05-14 16:42:18]:
>
> Hi,
>
> > It seems like sleep_clk was copied from ipq806x.
> > Fix ipq40xx sleep_clk to the value QSDK defines.
> >
> > Hope someone with datasheet could clarify the correct
> > value.
>
> what problem does this e
Hi!
I have successfully built kernel with PREEMPT_RT patch. I have flashed the
sysupgrade.bin to my BlackSwift. It boots to the point when usually it
would write to UART something like "init" but it hangs. CPU heats and I
think it's stuck in some kind of a deadlock. Is there any way to debug
this?
Hello all!
Thank you for the great OS!
I'm trying to build Chaos Calmer from source for BlackSwift board (AR9331
dev board).
Patches for it can be applied only for revision 49007. I'm trying to apply
RT_PREEMT patch for openwrt in that embedded system and I wish to publish
my work somehow. My idea
12 matches
Mail list logo
