ср, 15 мая 2019 г., 22:35 Petr Štetiar <yn...@true.cz>: > Павел <be.diss...@gmail.com> [2019-05-15 22:14:41]: > > > Not a problem, actually, but I've been suggested to squash them :) > > https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/2043#issuecomment-491581897 > > ok, thanks for the background, but still, squashing doesn't mean changing > authorship and Christian has probably also warned you beforehand :-) > > "(Note: In some of the patches the "Author" in the commits is dissent1! So > watch out before sending them off)" >
That was about different - I didn't switch from nickname to real name by mistake when exported patches from my staging tree. Thanks anyway, I'll add 2 commit messages into patchnotes within the squashed patch. Is that okay? > > Shouldn't the dev send the patch directly to me in order to be able to > post > > it on his behalf, like openwrt submitting patches guideline describes? > > From the kernel docs[1]: > > "The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best of my > knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source license and I have > the > right under that license to submit that work with modifications, whether > created in whole or in part by me, under the same open source license > (unless > I am permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated in the > file;" > > so in short, kernel is covered by GPLv2 which allows you to do this if you > retain the authorship. > > 1. > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#sign-your-work-the-developer-s-certificate-of-origin Okay, thanks for pointing out. > > -- ynezz >
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
