ср, 15 мая 2019 г., 18:55 Petr Štetiar <yn...@true.cz>: > Pavel Kubelun <be.diss...@gmail.com> [2019-05-14 16:42:18]: > > Hi, > > > It seems like sleep_clk was copied from ipq806x. > > Fix ipq40xx sleep_clk to the value QSDK defines. > > > > Hope someone with datasheet could clarify the correct > > value. > > what problem does this exactly fixes? Is there any particular reason why > this > shouldn't be sent upstream and then backported to OpenWrt? >
There are no reasons why it shouldn't be sent upstream along with other patches. I hope to find someone with datasheet beforehand to verify the correct sleep clock rate. Besides upstreaming a patch takes time while the next openwrt release should be out soon I suppose. This patch also contains a fix (node name) that allows the GCC driver to correctly initialize the clock and its children (USB sleep clock in fact) -- ynezz >
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
