Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] openssl: version bump

On 06/06/2014 01:00, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On Jun 5, 2014 2:54 PM, "joerg jungermann" > wrote: >> today appeared another serious vulnerability in openssl. More info is here http://ccsinjection.lepidum.co.jp. Users are advised to update to openssl 1.0.1

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] hotplug / micro-optimization

On 5 Jun 2014 04:19, "Bastian Bittorf" wrote: > 3) > during bootup or '/etc/init.d/$daemon enable' we build a directory for > enabled scripts. while we are at it, we can e.g. call 'ifup'/$ACTION if the > daemon supports/implements it, otherwise ignore You mean the symlinks in /etc/rcS/? _

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] WRT54GS v1.0 GPIO definitions in r41004

Also seems package/broadcom-diag/src/diag.c's legacy detection default WRT54G layout is correct for my board. But I guess nowadays diag.c uses board.c information first. On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Catalin Patulea wrote: > On Jun 5, 2014 4:13 PM, "Rafał Miłecki" wrote: >> See attached file (

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] openssl: version bump

On Jun 5, 2014 2:54 PM, "joerg jungermann" wrote: > > > > today appeared another serious vulnerability in openssl. More info is > > > here http://ccsinjection.lepidum.co.jp. Users are advised to update to > > > openssl 1.0.1h. > > Thank you for your patch, it was committed in r41026 and 41027. > W

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] WRT54GS v1.0 GPIO definitions in r41004

On Jun 5, 2014 4:13 PM, "Rafał Miłecki" wrote: > See attached file (I've just added your case to it). 0x0101/42/0x10 > seems correct for WRT54GS V1.0 (I found it in 2 other places too). As > you noticed, it's also the same for WRT54G V2. Thanks for this. Do you know if the GPIO layout is the same

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] openssl: version bump

> > today appeared another serious vulnerability in openssl. More info is > > here http://ccsinjection.lepidum.co.jp. Users are advised to update to > > openssl 1.0.1h. > Thank you for your patch, it was committed in r41026 and 41027. Will there be a backport to AA 12.09? best regards -- Joerg Ju

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] openssl: version bump

On 06/05/2014 03:13 PM, Martin Strbačka wrote: > Hello, > > today appeared another serious vulnerability in openssl. More info is > here http://ccsinjection.lepidum.co.jp. Users are advised to update to > openssl 1.0.1h. > > Signed-off-by: Martin Strbacka > --- Thank you for your patch, it was

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH V2] brcm47xx: move current target to "generic" subtarget

On 06/02/2014 11:34 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > This allows creating more subtargets and optimize builds per family. > > Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki > --- > V2: Rebase to apply after brcm47xx: enable the low-memory feature flag > --- > target/linux/brcm47xx/Makefile | 7 ++

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] brcm47xx: add mips74k subtarget for newer devices

On 06/05/2014 05:34 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > All new devices (with MIPS 74K CPU) are based on BCMA SoC and have > Ethernet core supported by bgmac. Create a new subtarget to generate > optimized builds. > This is just a beginning, further tweaks (like kernel configuration) > are still possible. T

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Kirkwood kernel version

Hi Claudio, On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 08:22:13AM -0400, Claudio Leite wrote: > I am cleaning up my port for a kirkwood-based router, D-Link DIR-665. > I see there are now some patches for 3.14, and a new 'router' > subtarget. I reworked the port to use the new subtarget. Should I also > rework it to

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] WRT54GS v1.0 GPIO definitions in r41004

On 5 June 2014 19:12, Catalin Patulea wrote: > It feels like I have a WRT54GS v1.0 hardware with WRT54G NVRAM. Does > anyone have a WRT54GS v1.0 nvram dump to compare? WRTSL54GS dump would > also be nice. See attached file (I've just added your case to it). 0x0101/42/0x10 seems correct for WRT54G

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] WRT54GS v1.0 GPIO definitions in r41004

On 5 June 2014 19:12, Catalin Patulea wrote: > Hi, > > I've got a WRT54GS v1.0 and trying to run r41004 on it. I'm having > trouble with assignment of GPIOs. > > The model number on the case, serial no, MAC and FCC ID all match a > WRT54GS v1.0 according to: > https://wikidevi.com/wiki/Linksys_WRT

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] WRT54GS v1.0 GPIO definitions in r41004

Here is dmesg also: http://pastebin.com/ZHXdd3PK Note: [ 12.58] gpio-keys gpio-keys.0: unable to claim gpio 6, err=-16 [ 12.66] gpio-keys: probe of gpio-keys.0 failed with error -16 [ 12.90] leds-gpio: probe of leds-gpio failed with error -16 I also have trouble with sysupgrade.

[OpenWrt-Devel] WRT54GS v1.0 GPIO definitions in r41004

Hi, I've got a WRT54GS v1.0 and trying to run r41004 on it. I'm having trouble with assignment of GPIOs. The model number on the case, serial no, MAC and FCC ID all match a WRT54GS v1.0 according to: https://wikidevi.com/wiki/Linksys_WRT54GS_v1.0 But my nvram has these board parameters: boardtyp

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] brcm47xx: add mips74k subtarget for newer devices

All new devices (with MIPS 74K CPU) are based on BCMA SoC and have Ethernet core supported by bgmac. Create a new subtarget to generate optimized builds. This is just a beginning, further tweaks (like kernel configuration) are still possible. This decreases default root.squashfs by ~128 kB. Signed

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Fixed wpa_supplicant locking hostapd to 20MHz (#12720)

On 2014-06-04 11:51, Lance Chaney wrote: > Fixed wpa_supplicant when the radio is in 40MHz mode so that it no > longer restarts hostapd with the second channel disableed. > > Signed-off-by: Lance Chaney Applied in r41019, thanks! - Felix ___ openwrt-de

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] openssl: version bump

Hello, today appeared another serious vulnerability in openssl. More info is here http://ccsinjection.lepidum.co.jp. Users are advised to update to openssl 1.0.1h. Signed-off-by: Martin Strbacka --- diff --git a/package/libs/openssl/Makefile b/package/libs/openssl/Makefile index 26833a3..fff260b

[OpenWrt-Devel] Kirkwood kernel version

Hi, I am cleaning up my port for a kirkwood-based router, D-Link DIR-665. I see there are now some patches for 3.14, and a new 'router' subtarget. I reworked the port to use the new subtarget. Should I also rework it to use the newer kernel before I submit it? I should note it builds (after a min

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] hostapd: move reading of rsn_preauth out of auth_type=eap context

On 2014-06-04 17:57, Reiner Herrmann wrote: > rsn_preauth is used outside of "case $auth_type", so if it is set > for an EAP-enabled SSID, it would also be set for the following > non-EAP-enabled SSIDs, because it would not be read again. > > Signed-off-by: Reiner Herrmann Committed in r41012, th

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ramips dwc_otg DEVICE_ONLY mode build failed

Hi, I modify some code to correct compilation errors. But the board halt on boot. >_< Is any one familiar with usb willing to help me? zhenjun_...@icloudaegis.com From: zhenjun_...@icloudaegis.com Date: 2014-06-05 16:16 To: john; openwrt-devel Subject: Re: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ramips dwc_otg

[OpenWrt-Devel] hotplug / micro-optimization

i have a router here with 400 vlan-interfaces. i'am still not happy, that an hotplug-event triggers a lot of unneccesary action. i see at least 3 possibilities reduce the load: (beside the upcoming procd-interface job) 1) each script implements something like: #!/bin/sh /etc/init.d/$daemon enab

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ramips dwc_otg DEVICE_ONLY mode build failed

Hi, I can't find try_wake_up() definition in kernel 3.10 and 3.9. Which openwrt version you compile it successfully? zhenjun_...@icloudaegis.com From: John Crispin Date: 2014-06-04 23:10 To: openwrt-devel Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ramips dwc_otg DEVICE_ONLY mode build failed On 04/06/201