Am 19.12.2016 um 11:01 schrieb Илья Шипицин:
>
> it seems, it depends on network-manager version.
> on fedora 23 I cannot import files, but on ubuntu I can.
Fedora 23 goes out of support these days (it's now more than 4 weeks
after Fedora 25 release), so it's time to upgrade...
--
Hi,
On 19 December 2016 at 14:48, David Sommerseth
wrote:
> On 19/12/16 10:41, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
>> Il 17/12/2016 16:44, Илья Шипицин ha scritto:
>>> I discussed this earlier with @mattock, however, there are more ideas :)
>>>
>>> 1) what do you think of participating GSoC in general ?
>>
>>
On 19/12/16 11:01, Илья Шипицин wrote:
>
> I also wonder if this should be a GSoC project for network-manager,
> not OpenVPN...
>
>
> it might be anybody's project.
Well, that's true in some sense. But when it comes to the mentor side
of things this particular project needs to be tied
On 19/12/16 10:41, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Il 17/12/2016 16:44, Илья Шипицин ha scritto:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I discussed this earlier with @mattock, however, there are more ideas :)
>>
>> 1) what do you think of participating GSoC in general ?
>
> In general that is probably a good idea. Tha
2016-12-19 14:41 GMT+05:00 Samuli Seppänen :
> Hi,
>
> Il 17/12/2016 16:44, Илья Шипицин ha scritto:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I discussed this earlier with @mattock, however, there are more ideas :)
>>
>> 1) what do you think of participating GSoC in general ?
>>
>
> In general that is probably a good id
Hi,
Il 17/12/2016 16:44, Илья Шипицин ha scritto:
> Hello,
>
> I discussed this earlier with @mattock, however, there are more ideas :)
>
> 1) what do you think of participating GSoC in general ?
In general that is probably a good idea. That said, we'd need somebody
to mentor the student, and th
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Sunday June 5, j...@yonan.net wrote:
> >
> > I don't think it's possible for the current TAP-Win32 driver to do OSI
> > Layer 3 with a network/netmask setting. This gets back to the same reason
> > why --ifconfig-pool-linear doesn't work on Windows:
> First, in this matter of a TAP driver for win 9x, i have to say
> that they aren't as dead as everyone might think. In countries that are
> in development or more poor, win 9x are the majority, The complications
> that come with winxp (bugs, worms, etc...) and the hardware that it
> requires are
On Sunday June 5, j...@yonan.net wrote:
>
> I don't think it's possible for the current TAP-Win32 driver to do OSI
> Layer 3 with a network/netmask setting. This gets back to the same reason
> why --ifconfig-pool-linear doesn't work on Windows: The TAP-Win32 driver
> is a TAP driver from the
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> James Yonan wrote:
> > On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Pawel Pokrywka wrote:
> >
> >
> >>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >>Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >>Hello,
> >>Google organizes contest, see:
> >>
> >>http://code.google.com/summerofcode.html
> >
> >
> > Unfor
> > > The main change to the OpenVPN protocol is that when "ifconfig" is
> > > "pushed" to the client, it pushes an address and a subnetmask, instead
> > > of two addresses. (It already does this for dev==tap, so it isn't a
> > > big deal).
>
> This is my key point. The client needs to be told t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Unfortunately, I think we are late :(
Well, that's sad.
> I'm a bit worried that this project might never happen because:
>
> (a) Open source developers who are motivated by working on cool,
> intellectually stimulating projects may not want to j
James Yonan wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Pawel Pokrywka wrote:
>
>
>>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>Hello,
>>Google organizes contest, see:
>>
>>http://code.google.com/summerofcode.html
>
>
> Unfortunately, I think we are late :(
>
> From: Chris DiBona
> To: j...@yon
On Saturday June 4, j...@yonan.net wrote:
>
> On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Neil Brown wrote:
> > A "real" tun driver (by which I assume you mean one that support
> > point-to-point addressing) isn't needed to avoid "losing" 2 addresses
> > per client.
> > What is needed is for openvpn to understand that a
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Pawel Pokrywka wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
> Google organizes contest, see:
>
> http://code.google.com/summerofcode.html
Unfortunately, I think we are late :(
From: Chris DiBona
To: j...@yonan.net
Subject: Re: [M#27498536] [Ope
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Saturday June 4, ov_de...@l3h.de wrote:
> >
> > I think, a real tun driver for Windows is a killer feature. This would make
> > large heterogenous VPN setups much easier, because you could provide your
> > clients a layer-3 VPN without "losing" 2 addre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>>Google organizes contest, see:
>>
>>http://code.google.com/summerofcode.html
> Hi,
> if I didn't have to write my thesis this summer, I'd love to participate.
Hi, I'm in the process of writing thesis too :)
> IMHO, TAP Support for Win95/98/Me isn'
Am Samstag, den 04.06.2005, 13:13 +0200 schrieb Daniel Lehmann:
> I think, a real tun driver for Windows is a killer feature. This would make
> large heterogenous VPN setups much easier, because you could provide your
> clients a layer-3 VPN without "losing" 2 addresses per client.
And in addit
On Saturday June 4, ov_de...@l3h.de wrote:
>
> I think, a real tun driver for Windows is a killer feature. This would make
> large heterogenous VPN setups much easier, because you could provide your
> clients a layer-3 VPN without "losing" 2 addresses per client.
>
A "real" tun driver (by whic
Am Saturday 04 June 2005 12:28 schrieb Pawel Pokrywka:
> Hello,
> Google organizes contest, see:
>
> http://code.google.com/summerofcode.html
> In particular, there is one missing feature - and no one is intereseted
> in doing it - Windows 9x/ME support in TAP-win32. Programming for old
> Windows
20 matches
Mail list logo
