Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] CephFS native driver

2015-09-25 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
So here are questions from my side. Just question. 1.What is the biggest advantage comparing others such as RDB? We should be able to implement what you are going to do in existing module, shouldn't we? 2.What are you going to focus on with a new implementation? It seems to be to use NFS

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][release] 2015.1.2

2015-09-25 Thread Matthias Runge
On 25/09/15 00:17, Alan Pevec wrote: >> For Horizon, it would make sense to move this a week back. We discovered >> a few issues in Liberty, which are present in current kilo, too. I'd >> love to cherry-pick a few of them to kilo. > > What are LP bug#s ? Are you saying that fixes are still work in

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] [Ceilometer] Liberty RC1 available

2015-09-25 Thread Thierry Carrez
Hello everyone, Ceilometer and Neutron just produced their first release candidate for the end of the Liberty cycle. The RC1 tarballs, as well as a list of last-minute features and fixed bugs since liberty-1 are available at: https://launchpad.net/ceilometer/liberty/liberty-rc1 https://launchpad.

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-operators][Rally] Rally plugins reference is available

2015-09-25 Thread Aleksandr Maretskiy
Cool! On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > Hi stackers, > > As far as you know Rally test cases are created as a mix of plugins. > > At this point of time we have more than 200 plugins for almost all > OpenStack projects. > Before you had to analyze code of plugins or use "ra

[openstack-dev] [neutron] How could an L2 agent extension access agent methods ?

2015-09-25 Thread thomas.morin
Hi everyone, (TL;DR: we would like an L2 agent extension to be able to call methods on the agent class, e.g. OVSAgent) In the networking-bgpvpn project, we need the reference driver to interact with the ML2 openvswitch agent with new RPCs to allow exchanging information with the BGP VPN impl

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Ironic is open for Mitaka development

2015-09-25 Thread Thierry Carrez
Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > I've proposed a patch to release Ironic 4.2.0, and we will be cutting > the stable/liberty branch from the same SHA: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/227582/ It's now released at: https://launchpad.net/ironic/liberty/4.2.0 and the Liberty release branch was cut at: http

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] CephFS native driver

2015-09-25 Thread John Spray
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Shinobu Kinjo wrote: > So here are questions from my side. > Just question. > > > 1.What is the biggest advantage comparing others such as RDB? > We should be able to implement what you are going to do in > existing module, shouldn't we? I guess you mean comp

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] How could an L2 agent extension access agent methods ?

2015-09-25 Thread Kevin Benton
Sorry, that should have said, "We don't want to give extensions direct access to the agent object..." On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Kevin Benton wrote: > I think the 4th of the options you proposed would be the best. We don't > want to give agents direct access to the agent object or else we

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] How could an L2 agent extension access agent methods ?

2015-09-25 Thread Kevin Benton
I think the 4th of the options you proposed would be the best. We don't want to give agents direct access to the agent object or else we will run the risk of breaking extensions all of the time during any kind of reorganization or refactoring. Having a well defined API in between will give us flexi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Solum] Using os-auth-token and os-image-url with glance client

2015-09-25 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 24/09/15 22:44 +, Devdatta Kulkarni wrote: Hi, Glance team, In Solum, we use Glance to store Docker images that we create for applications. We use Glance client internally to upload these images. Till recently, 'glance image-create' with only token has been working for us (in devstack).

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] How could an L2 agent extension access agent methods ?

2015-09-25 Thread Miguel Angel Ajo
I didn't finish reading it, and was thinking about the same thing exactly. IMHO option 4th is the best. So we will be able to provide an interface where stability is controlled, where we can deprecate things in a controlled manner, and we know what we support and what we don't. Do you have a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] CephFS native driver

2015-09-25 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Thank you for your reply. > The main distinction here is that for > native CephFS clients, they get a shared filesystem where all the > clients can talk to all the Ceph OSDs directly, and avoid the > potential bottleneck of an NFS->local fs->RBD server. As you know each pass from clients to rados

[openstack-dev] [magnum] debugging functional testing on gate

2015-09-25 Thread Qiao,Liyong
hi folks, I am working on add functional testing case for "creating" bays on gate. for now, there is k8s bay creation/deletion testing, I want to adding more swarm/mesos type bay testing, but I tried times , gate failed to create swarm bay. per my experience, swarm-master/node requires to acces

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] How could an L2 agent extension access agent methods ?

2015-09-25 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
Yes, looks like option 4 is the best. We need an abstraction layer between extensions and agents, to make sure API makes sense for all AMQP based agents. Common agent framework that I think Sean side looks at [1] could partially define that agent interface for us. [1]: https://review.openstack

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] CephFS native driver

2015-09-25 Thread John Spray
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Shinobu Kinjo wrote: > Thank you for your reply. > >> The main distinction here is that for >> native CephFS clients, they get a shared filesystem where all the >> clients can talk to all the Ceph OSDs directly, and avoid the >> potential bottleneck of an NFS->loc

Re: [openstack-dev] Compute API (Was Re: [nova][cinder] how to handle AZ bug 1496235?)

2015-09-25 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Le 25/09/2015 00:13, James Penick a écrit : At risk of getting too offtopic I think there's an alternate solution to doing this in Nova or on the client side. I think we're missing some sort of OpenStack API and service that can handle this. Nova is a low level infrastructur

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] suggestion on commit message title format for the murano-apps repository

2015-09-25 Thread Kirill Zaitsev
Looks reasonable to me! Could you maybe document that on HACKING.rst in the repo? We could vote on the commit itself.  --  Kirill Zaitsev Murano team Software Engineer Mirantis, Inc On 25 Sep 2015 at 02:14:09, Alexey Khivin (akhi...@mirantis.com) wrote: Hello everyone Almost an every commit-me

Re: [openstack-dev] [Large Deployments Team][Performance Team] New informal working group suggestion

2015-09-25 Thread Sandeep Raman
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Dina Belova wrote: > Hey, OpenStackers! > > I'm writing to propose to organise new informal team to work specifically > on the OpenStack performance issues. This will be a sub team in already > existing Large Deployments Team, and I suppose it will be a good idea

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-i18n] [nova][i18n] Is there any point in using _() inpython-novaclient?

2015-09-25 Thread Davanum Srinivas
That sounds like the right solution Andreas. thanks! -- Dims On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 1:42 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 09/20/2015 03:06 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > >> On 09/20/2015 02:16 PM, Duncan Thomas wrote: >> >>> Certainly for cinder, and I suspect many other project, the openstack >>>

[openstack-dev] [Rally][Meeting][Agenda]

2015-09-25 Thread Roman Vasilets
Hi, its a friendly reminder that if you what to discuss some topics at Rally meetings, please add you topic to our Meeting agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Rally#Agenda. Don't forget to specify who will lead topic discusion. Add some information about topic(links, etc.) Thank you for

Re: [openstack-dev] Apache2 vs uWSGI vs ...

2015-09-25 Thread Sergii Golovatiuk
Hi, Morgan gave the perfect case why operators want to use uWSGI. Let's imagine a future when all openstack services will work as mod_wsgi processes under apache. It's like to put all eggs in one basket. If you need to reconfigure one service on controller it may affect another service. For instan

Re: [openstack-dev] Apache2 vs uWSGI vs ...

2015-09-25 Thread Sergii Golovatiuk
Alexandr, oauth, shibboleth & openid support are very keystone specific features. Many other openstack projects don't need these modules at all but they may require faster HTTP server (lighthttp/nginx). For all projects we may use "HTTP server -> uwsgi" model and leave apache for keystone as " HT

Re: [openstack-dev] [OPNFV] [Functest] Tempest & Rally

2015-09-25 Thread Boris Pavlovic
Jose, Rally community provides official docker images here: https://hub.docker.com/r/rallyforge/rally/ So I would suggest to use them. Best regards, Boris Pavlovic On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Jose Lausuch wrote: > Hi, > > > > Thanks for the hint Boris. > > > > Regarding what we do at

Re: [openstack-dev] Apache2 vs uWSGI vs ...

2015-09-25 Thread Adam Heczko
Are we discussing mod_wsgi and Keystone or OpenStack as a general? If Keystone specific use case, then probably Apache provides broadest choice of tested external authenticators. I'm not against uwsgi at all, but to be honest expectation that nginx could substitute Apache in terms of authentication

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Mistral Liberty RC1 available

2015-09-25 Thread Renat Akhmerov
Hi, Mistral Liberty RC1 release is available. The exact version name is 1.0.0.0rc1. Look at the release page in order to see a list of bugs fixed during RC1 cycle: https://launchpad.net/mistral/liberty/liberty-rc1 Thanks! Renat Akhmerov @ Mi

[openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging][devstack] Pika RabbitMQ driver implementation

2015-09-25 Thread Dmitriy Ukhlov
Hello stackers, I'm working on new olso.messaging RabbitMQ driver implementation which uses pika client library instead of kombu. It related to https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+spec/rabbit-pika. In this letter I want to share current results and probably get first feedack from you.

[openstack-dev] VDI questions

2015-09-25 Thread John Hunter
Hi guys, I am new to OpenStack, so I want to ask is there a project that works on VDI(Virtual Desktop Infrastructure) based OpenStack? I want to dig into it, please help. Sincerely, Zhao -- Best regards Junwang Zhao Department of Computer Science &Technology Peking University Beijing, 100871, PR

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] tripleo.org theme

2015-09-25 Thread Dan Prince
It has come to my attention that we aren't making great use of our tripleo.org domain. One thing that would be useful would be to have the new tripleo-docs content displayed there. It would also be nice to have quick links to some of our useful resources, perhaps Derek's CI report [1], a custom Rev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] CephFS native driver

2015-09-25 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Thanks! Keep me in the loop. Shinobu - Original Message - From: "John Spray" To: "Shinobu Kinjo" Cc: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 6:54:09 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] CephFS native driver On Fri, Sep 25, 2

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] How could an L2 agent extension access agent methods ?

2015-09-25 Thread thomas.morin
Kevin, Miguel, I agree that (4) is what makes most sense. (more below) Miguel Angel Ajo : Do you have a rough idea of what operations you may need to do? Right now, what bagpipe driver for networking-bgpvpn needs to interact with is: - int_br OVSBridge (read-only) - tun_br OVSBridge (add pa

Re: [openstack-dev] Apache2 vs uWSGI vs ...

2015-09-25 Thread David Stanek
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:25 AM Adam Heczko wrote: > Are we discussing mod_wsgi and Keystone or OpenStack as a general? > If Keystone specific use case, then probably Apache provides broadest > choice of tested external authenticators. > I'm not against uwsgi at all, but to be honest expectation

Re: [openstack-dev] VDI questions

2015-09-25 Thread John Hunter
As far as I know, there are some vendors provide VDI, VMware View, Citrix Xenserver, Amazon WorkSpaces. Is there a corresponding project in OpenStack? Please help! On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:34 PM, John Hunter wrote: > Hi guys, > I am new to OpenStack, so I want to ask is there a project that >

Re: [openstack-dev] Apache2 vs uWSGI vs ...

2015-09-25 Thread Sergii Golovatiuk
David, I am thinking how all OpenStack components may coexist as mod_wsgi processes under apache. In Fuel we stepped into problem with deployment using graceful restart [1] thus this thread was raised to have a good WSGI alternatives. [1] https://github.com/GrahamDumpleton/mod_wsgi/pull/95

Re: [openstack-dev] Apache2 vs uWSGI vs ...

2015-09-25 Thread Adam Heczko
OK, sorry I mixed up nginx and uwsgi :) A. On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 2:54 PM, David Stanek wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:25 AM Adam Heczko wrote: > >> Are we discussing mod_wsgi and Keystone or OpenStack as a general? >> If Keystone specific use case, then probably Apache provides broades

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] How could an L2 agent extension access agent methods ?

2015-09-25 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
> On 25 Sep 2015, at 14:37, thomas.mo...@orange.com wrote: > > Kevin, Miguel, > > I agree that (4) is what makes most sense. > (more below) > > Miguel Angel Ajo : >> Do you have a rough idea of what operations you may need to do? > > Right now, what bagpipe driver for networking-bgpvpn needs t

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][release] 2015.1.2

2015-09-25 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
> On 25 Sep 2015, at 09:02, Matthias Runge wrote: > > On 25/09/15 00:17, Alan Pevec wrote: >>> For Horizon, it would make sense to move this a week back. We discovered >>> a few issues in Liberty, which are present in current kilo, too. I'd >>> love to cherry-pick a few of them to kilo. >> >> Wh

[openstack-dev] [election][tc] TC Candidacy

2015-09-25 Thread Doug Hellmann
I am announcing my candidacy for a position on the OpenStack Technical Committee. I am currently employed by HP to work 100% upstream on OpenStack. I started contributing to OpenStack in 2012, not long after joining Dreamhost. In the time since, I have worked on a wide variety of projects within t

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][nova] how to upgrade from v1 to v2?

2015-09-25 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Mark Voelker's message of 2015-09-25 01:20:04 +: > > > > On Sep 24, 2015, at 5:55 PM, Sabari Murugesan wrote: > > > > Hi Melanie > > > > In general, images created by glance v1 API should be accessible using v2 > > and > > vice-versa. We fixed some bugs [1] [2] [3] where meta

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] LnP tests for oslo.messaging

2015-09-25 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Huang, Oscar's message of 2015-09-25 02:32:02 +: > Hi, > We would like to setup a LnP test environment for oslo.messaging and > Rabbit MQ so that we can continuously track the stability and performance > impact of the olso/kombu/amqp library changes and MQ upgrades. >

Re: [openstack-dev] Compute API (Was Re: [nova][cinder] how to handle AZ bug 1496235?)

2015-09-25 Thread Andrew Laski
On 09/24/15 at 03:13pm, James Penick wrote: At risk of getting too offtopic I think there's an alternate solution to doing this in Nova or on the client side. I think we're missing some sort of OpenStack API and service that can handle this. Nova is a low level infrastructure API and service,

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] nominating Brant Knudson for Oslo core

2015-09-25 Thread Ben Nemec
Not sure if my vote still counts, but +1. :-) On 09/24/2015 12:12 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Oslo team, > > I am nominating Brant Knudson for Oslo core. > > As liaison from the Keystone team Brant has participated in meetings, > summit sessions, and other discussions at a level higher than some

[openstack-dev] [all] -1 due to line length violation in commit messages

2015-09-25 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
Hi all, releases are approaching, so it’s the right time to start some bike shedding on the mailing list. Recently I got pointed out several times [1][2] that I violate our commit message requirement [3] for the message lines that says: "Subsequent lines should be wrapped at 72 characters.” I

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][nova] how to upgrade from v1 to v2?

2015-09-25 Thread Andrew Laski
On 09/25/15 at 09:59am, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Mark Voelker's message of 2015-09-25 01:20:04 +: > > On Sep 24, 2015, at 5:55 PM, Sabari Murugesan wrote: > > Hi Melanie > > In general, images created by glance v1 API should be accessible using v2 and > vice-versa. We fixed some b

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] -1 due to line length violation in commit messages

2015-09-25 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 09/25/2015 04:44 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Hi all, releases are approaching, so it’s the right time to start some bike shedding on the mailing list. Recently I got pointed out several times [1][2] that I violate our commit message requirement [3] for the message lines that says: "Subseque

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] -1 due to line length violation in commit messages

2015-09-25 Thread Vikram Choudhary
+1 for <=80 chars. It will be uniform with the existing coding style. On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 09/25/2015 04:44 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> releases are approaching, so it’s the right time to start some bike >> shedding on the mailing list. >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] -1 due to line length violation in commit messages

2015-09-25 Thread Julien Danjou
On Fri, Sep 25 2015, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > I agree that very long commit message lines can be bad, f.e. if they > are 200+ chars. But <= 79 chars?.. Don’t think so. Especially since we > have 79 chars limit for the code. Agreed. <= 80 chars should be a rule of thumb and applied in a smart way.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] -1 due to line length violation in commit messages

2015-09-25 Thread Doug Hellmann
git tools such as git log and git show indent the commit message in their output, so you don't actually have the full 79/80 character width to work with. That's where the 72 comes from. Doug Excerpts from Vikram Choudhary's message of 2015-09-25 20:25:41 +0530: > +1 for <=80 chars. It will be uni

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][nova] how to upgrade from v1 to v2?

2015-09-25 Thread Mark Voelker
On Sep 25, 2015, at 10:42 AM, Andrew Laski wrote: > > On 09/25/15 at 09:59am, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> Excerpts from Mark Voelker's message of 2015-09-25 01:20:04 +: >>> > >>> > On Sep 24, 2015, at 5:55 PM, Sabari Murugesan >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > Hi Melanie >>> > >>> > In general, images c

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Servicegroup refactoring for the Control Plane - Mitaka

2015-09-25 Thread Dulko, Michal
On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 11:11 -0700, Vilobh Meshram wrote: > Accepted in Liberty [1] [2] : > [1] Services information be stored in respective backend configured > by CONF.servicegroup_driver and all the interfaces which plan to > access service information go through servicegroup layer. > [2] Add to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] -1 due to line length violation in commit messages

2015-09-25 Thread Ivan Kolodyazhny
+1 for <=80 chars. 72 characters sometimes are not enough Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > git tools such as git log and git show indent the commit message in > their output, so you don't actually have the full 79/80 character width > to work wit

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] -1 due to line length violation in commit messages

2015-09-25 Thread Ryan Brown
On 09/25/2015 10:44 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Hi all, releases are approaching, so it’s the right time to start some bike shedding on the mailing list. Recently I got pointed out several times [1][2] that I violate our commit message requirement [3] for the message lines that says: "Subsequent

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] -1 due to line length violation in commit messages

2015-09-25 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 04:44:59PM +0200, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Hi all, > > releases are approaching, so it’s the right time to start some bike shedding > on the mailing list. > > Recently I got pointed out several times [1][2] that I violate our commit > message requirement [3] for the mess

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] -1 due to line length violation in commit messages

2015-09-25 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-09-25 16:44:59 +0200 (+0200), Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: [...] > I believe commit message lines of <=80 chars are absolutely fine > and should not get -1 treatment. I propose to raise the limit for > the guideline on wiki accordingly. [...] As one of those traditionalists who still does all hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] service default value functions

2015-09-25 Thread Yanis Guenane
On 09/23/2015 02:17 AM, Cody Herriges wrote: > Alex Schultz wrote: >> Hey puppet folks, >> >> Based on the meeting yesterday[0], I had proposed creating a parser >> function called is_service_default[1] to validate if a variable matched >> our agreed upon value of ''. This got me thinking >> abo

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] -1 due to line length violation in commit messages

2015-09-25 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:05:09AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > git tools such as git log and git show indent the commit message in > their output, so you don't actually have the full 79/80 character width > to work with. That's where the 72 comes from. It is also commonly done because so that wh

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging][devstack] Pika RabbitMQ driver implementation

2015-09-25 Thread Joshua Harlow
Dmitriy Ukhlov wrote: Hello stackers, I'm working on new olso.messaging RabbitMQ driver implementation which uses pika client library instead of kombu. It related to https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+spec/rabbit-pika. In this letter I want to share current results and probably get

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging][devstack] Pika RabbitMQ driver implementation

2015-09-25 Thread Joshua Harlow
Also a side question, that someone might know, Whatever happened to the folks from rabbitmq (incorporated? pivotal?) who were going to get involved in oslo.messaging, did that ever happen; if anyone knows? They might be a good bunch of people to review such a pika driver (since I think they

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] [app-catalog] versions for murano assets in the catalog

2015-09-25 Thread Fox, Kevin M
To clarify a bit, We're unsure that running glance without keystone as a distribution mechanism for apps.openstack.org assets is a good idea/fit. Having assets stored in the local cloud all in one place (In glance) seems like a very good idea to me. We need closer communications between Murano,

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][nova] how to upgrade from v1 to v2?

2015-09-25 Thread Chris Hoge
> On Sep 25, 2015, at 6:59 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Mark Voelker's message of 2015-09-25 01:20:04 +: >>> >>> On Sep 24, 2015, at 5:55 PM, Sabari Murugesan wrote: >>> >>> Hi Melanie >>> >>> In general, images created by glance v1 API should be accessible using v2 >>> an

[openstack-dev] [puppet] should puppet-neutron manage third party software?

2015-09-25 Thread Emilien Macchi
In our last meeting [1], we were discussing about whether managing or not external packaging repositories for Neutron plugin dependencies. Current situation: puppet-neutron is installing (packages like neutron-plugin-*) & configure Neutron plugins (configuration files like /etc/neutron/plugins/*.i

Re: [openstack-dev] CephFS native driver

2015-09-25 Thread Fox, Kevin M
I think having a native cephfs driver without nfs in the cloud is a very compelling feature. nfs is nearly impossible to make both HA and Scalable without adding really expensive dedicated hardware. Ceph on the other hand scales very nicely and its very fault tollerent out of the box. Thanks, K

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] tripleo.org theme

2015-09-25 Thread Derek Higgins
On 25/09/15 13:34, Dan Prince wrote: It has come to my attention that we aren't making great use of our tripleo.org domain. One thing that would be useful would be to have the new tripleo-docs content displayed there. It would also be nice to have quick links to some of our useful resources, pe

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] -1 due to line length violation in commit messages

2015-09-25 Thread Fox, Kevin M
Yeah, and worse, since I never can remember the exact number(72 I guess), I always just round down to 70-1 to be safe. Its silly. Thanks, Kevin From: Ihar Hrachyshka [ihrac...@redhat.com] Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 7:44 AM To: OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] should puppet-neutron manage third party software?

2015-09-25 Thread Edgar Magana
Hi There, I just added my comment on the review. I do agree with Emilien. There should be specific repos for plugins and drivers. BTW. I love the sdnmagic name ;-) Edgar On 9/25/15, 9:02 AM, "Emilien Macchi" wrote: >In our last meeting [1], we were discussing about whether managing or >n

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] -1 due to line length violation in commit messages

2015-09-25 Thread Fox, Kevin M
Another option... why are we wasting time on something that a computer can handle? Why not just let the line length be infinite in the commit message and have gerrit wrap it to length lines on merge? Thanks, Kevin From: Jim Rollenhagen [j...@jimrollenhag

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][nova] how to upgrade from v1 to v2?

2015-09-25 Thread Mark Voelker
On Sep 25, 2015, at 12:00 PM, Chris Hoge wrote: > >> >> On Sep 25, 2015, at 6:59 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> >> Excerpts from Mark Voelker's message of 2015-09-25 01:20:04 +: On Sep 24, 2015, at 5:55 PM, Sabari Murugesan wrote: Hi Melanie In general,

[openstack-dev] [release][ironic] Ironic 4.2.0 release

2015-09-25 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
Hi all, I'm proud to announce the release of Ironic 4.2.0! This follows quickly on our 4.1.0 release with 21 bug fixes, and marks the completion of four blueprints. It is also the basis for our stable/Liberty branch, and will be included in the coordinated OpenStack Liberty release. Major change

Re: [openstack-dev] Apache2 vs uWSGI vs ...

2015-09-25 Thread Adam Young
On 09/25/2015 07:09 AM, Sergii Golovatiuk wrote: Hi, Morgan gave the perfect case why operators want to use uWSGI. Let's imagine a future when all openstack services will work as mod_wsgi processes under apache. It's like to put all eggs in one basket. If you need to reconfigure one service o

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] should puppet-neutron manage third party software?

2015-09-25 Thread Anita Kuno
On 09/25/2015 12:14 PM, Edgar Magana wrote: > Hi There, > > I just added my comment on the review. I do agree with Emilien. There should > be specific repos for plugins and drivers. > > BTW. I love the sdnmagic name ;-) > > Edgar > > > > > On 9/25/15, 9:02 AM, "Emilien Macchi" wrote: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] Apache2 vs uWSGI vs ...

2015-09-25 Thread Morgan Fainberg
There is no reason why the wsgi app container matters. This is simply a "we should document use if uwsgi and/or gunicorn as an alternative to mod_wsgi". If one solution is better for the gate it will be used there and each deployment will make the determination of what they want to use. Adam's p

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] should we use fsync when writing iscsi config file?

2015-09-25 Thread Chris Friesen
On 09/24/2015 04:21 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: On 09/24/2015 12:18 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: I think what happened is that we took the SIGTERM after the open() call in create_iscsi_target(), but before writing anything to the file. f = open(volume_path, 'w+') f.write(volume_con

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Late Liberty patches should now be unblocked ...

2015-09-25 Thread Jay S. Bryant
All, Now that Mitaka is open I have done my best to go through and remove all the -2's that I had given to block Liberty patches that needed to wait for Mitaka. If you have a patch that I missed please ping me on IRC. Happy Mitaka merging! Thanks, Jay _

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] -1 due to line length violation in commit messages

2015-09-25 Thread Russell Bryant
On 09/25/2015 12:15 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: > Another option... why are we wasting time on something that a > computer can handle? Why not just let the line length be infinite in > the commit message and have gerrit wrap it to here> length lines on merge? I don't think gerrit should mess with the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [puppet] feedback request about puppet-keystone

2015-09-25 Thread Emilien Macchi
On 09/21/2015 12:20 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Hi, > > Puppet OpenStack group would like to know your feedback about using > puppet-keystone module. > > Please take two minutes and feel the form [1] that contains a few > questions. The answers will help us to define our roadmap for the next >

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][nova] how to upgrade from v1 to v2?

2015-09-25 Thread Andrew Laski
On 09/25/15 at 03:09pm, Mark Voelker wrote: On Sep 25, 2015, at 10:42 AM, Andrew Laski wrote: On 09/25/15 at 09:59am, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Mark Voelker's message of 2015-09-25 01:20:04 +: > > On Sep 24, 2015, at 5:55 PM, Sabari Murugesan wrote: > > Hi Melanie > > In genera

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][nova] how to upgrade from v1 to v2?

2015-09-25 Thread Brian Rosmaita
I'd like to clarify something. On 9/25/15, 12:16 PM, "Mark Voelker" wrote: [big snip] >Also worth pointing out here: when we talk about ³doing the same thing² >from a DefCore perspective, we¹re essentially talking about what¹s >exposed to the end user, not how that¹s implemented in OpenStack¹s so

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] tripleo.org theme

2015-09-25 Thread Ben Nemec
On 09/25/2015 07:34 AM, Dan Prince wrote: > It has come to my attention that we aren't making great use of our > tripleo.org domain. One thing that would be useful would be to have the > new tripleo-docs content displayed there. It would also be nice to have > quick links to some of our useful reso

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][nova] how to upgrade from v1 to v2?

2015-09-25 Thread Mark Voelker
On Sep 25, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > > I'd like to clarify something. > > On 9/25/15, 12:16 PM, "Mark Voelker" wrote: > [big snip] >> Also worth pointing out here: when we talk about ³doing the same thing² >> from a DefCore perspective, we¹re essentially talking about what¹s >>

[openstack-dev] [neutron][horizon] Nice new Network Topology panel in Horizon

2015-09-25 Thread Henry Gessau
It has been about three years in the making but now it is finally here. A screenshot doesn't do it justice, so here is a short video overview: https://youtu.be/PxFd-lJV0e4 Isn't that neat? I am sure you can see that it is a great improvement, especially for larger topologies. This new view will b

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][nova] how to upgrade from v1 to v2?

2015-09-25 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Mark Voelker's message of 2015-09-25 17:42:24 +: > On Sep 25, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Brian Rosmaita > wrote: > > > > I'd like to clarify something. > > > > On 9/25/15, 12:16 PM, "Mark Voelker" wrote: > > [big snip] > >> Also worth pointing out here: when we talk about ³doing the s

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] should we use fsync when writing iscsi config file?

2015-09-25 Thread Mitsuhiro Tanino
On 09/22/2015 06:43 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > On 23 September 2015 at 09:52, Chris Friesen > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I recently had an issue with one file out of a dozen or so in >> "/opt/cgcs/cinder/data/volumes/" being present but of size zero. I'm >> running stable/kilo if it makes a differen

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] should we use fsync when writing iscsi config file?

2015-09-25 Thread Eric Harney
On 09/25/2015 02:30 PM, Mitsuhiro Tanino wrote: > On 09/22/2015 06:43 PM, Robert Collins wrote: >> On 23 September 2015 at 09:52, Chris Friesen >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I recently had an issue with one file out of a dozen or so in >>> "/opt/cgcs/cinder/data/volumes/" being present but of size z

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Late Liberty patches should now be unblocked ...

2015-09-25 Thread Ivan Kolodyazhny
Thanks, Jay. I've removed my -2's last night. If I missed something, please ping me via e-mail or IRC (e0ne). Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:59 PM, Jay S. Bryant < jsbry...@electronicjungle.net> wrote: > All, > > Now that Mitaka is open I have done my best to go through an

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] -1 due to line length violation in commit messages

2015-09-25 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-09-25 16:15:15 + (+), Fox, Kevin M wrote: > Another option... why are we wasting time on something that a > computer can handle? Why not just let the line length be infinite > in the commit message and have gerrit wrap it to number here> length lines on merge? The commit message c

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] should we use fsync when writing iscsi config file?

2015-09-25 Thread Chris Friesen
On 09/25/2015 12:30 PM, Mitsuhiro Tanino wrote: On 09/22/2015 06:43 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 23 September 2015 at 09:52, Chris Friesen wrote: Hi, I recently had an issue with one file out of a dozen or so in "/opt/cgcs/cinder/data/volumes/" being present but of size zero. I'm running sta

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] should we use fsync when writing iscsi config file?

2015-09-25 Thread Mitsuhiro Tanino
> -Original Message- > From: Eric Harney [mailto:ehar...@redhat.com] > Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 2:56 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] should we use fsync when writing iscsi > config file? > > On 09/25/2015

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Recent proposal to remove NetApp drivers

2015-09-25 Thread John Griffith
Hey Everyone, So I've been kinda busy on IRC today with conversations about some patches I proposed yesterday [1], [2]. I thought maybe I should try and explain my actions a bit, because it seems that some think I just arbitrarily flew off the handle and proposed something drastic, or that I had

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Recent proposal to remove NetApp drivers

2015-09-25 Thread Anita Kuno
On 09/25/2015 03:15 PM, John Griffith wrote: > Hey Everyone, > > So I've been kinda busy on IRC today with conversations about some patches > I proposed yesterday [1], [2]. > > I thought maybe I should try and explain my actions a bit, because it seems > that some think I just arbitrarily flew of

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] should we use fsync when writing iscsi config file?

2015-09-25 Thread Mitsuhiro Tanino
> -Original Message- > From: Chris Friesen [mailto:chris.frie...@windriver.com] > Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 3:04 PM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] should we use fsync when writing iscsi > config file? > > On 09/25/2015 12:30 PM, Mitsu

[openstack-dev] [Heat] Assumptions regarding extensions to OpenStack api's

2015-09-25 Thread Pratik Mallya
Hello Heat Team, I was wondering if OpenStack Heat assumes that the Nova extensions api would always exist in a cloud? My impression was that since these features are extensions, they may or may not be implemented by the cloud provider and hence Heat must not rely on it being present. My quest

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][horizon] Nice new Network Topology panel in Horizon

2015-09-25 Thread Daniel Comnea
Great job Henry ! On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Henry Gessau wrote: > It has been about three years in the making but now it is finally here. > A screenshot doesn't do it justice, so here is a short video overview: > https://youtu.be/PxFd-lJV0e4 > > Isn't that neat? I am sure you can see that

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Recent proposal to remove NetApp drivers

2015-09-25 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-09-25 13:15:24 -0600 (-0600), John Griffith wrote: [...] > It seems that there are folks that have taken quite a bit of offense to > this, and are more than mildly upset with me. To them I apologize if this > upset you. I will say however that given the same situation and timing, I > woul

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Recent proposal to remove NetApp drivers

2015-09-25 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 1:15 PM, John Griffith wrote: > Hey Everyone, > > So I've been kinda busy on IRC today with conversations about some patches > I proposed yesterday [1], [2]. > > I thought maybe I should try and explain my actions a bit, because it > seems that some think I just arbitraril

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][nova] how to upgrade from v1 to v2?

2015-09-25 Thread Rochelle Grober
Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Mark Voelker's message of 2015-09-25 17:42:24 +: > On Sep 25, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Brian Rosmaita > wrote: > > > > I'd like to clarify something. > > > > On 9/25/15, 12:16 PM, "Mark Voelker" wrote: > > [big snip] > >> Also worth pointing out here: when we

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][horizon] Nice new Network Topology panel in Horizon

2015-09-25 Thread Henry Gessau
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015, Daniel Comnea wrote: > Great job Henry ! I had nothing to do with it! (See below.) > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Henry Gessau > wrote: > > It has been about three years in the making but now it is finally here. > A screenshot doesn't

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Assumptions regarding extensions to OpenStack api's

2015-09-25 Thread Monty Taylor
On 09/25/2015 02:32 PM, Pratik Mallya wrote: Hello Heat Team, I was wondering if OpenStack Heat assumes that the Nova extensions api would always exist in a cloud? My impression was that since these features are extensions, they may or may not be implemented by the cloud provider and hence Heat

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging][devstack] Pika RabbitMQ driver implementation

2015-09-25 Thread Dmitriy Ukhlov
Hello Joshua, thank you for your feedback. This will end up on review.openstack.org right so that it can be properly > reviewed (it will likely take a while since it looks to be ~1000+ lines of > code)? Yes, sure I will send this patch to review.openstack.org, but first of all I need to get mer

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][nova] how to upgrade from v1 to v2?

2015-09-25 Thread Mark Voelker
On Sep 25, 2015, at 1:56 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Mark Voelker's message of 2015-09-25 17:42:24 +: >> On Sep 25, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Brian Rosmaita >> wrote: >>> >>> I'd like to clarify something. >>> >>> On 9/25/15, 12:16 PM, "Mark Voelker" wrote: >>> [big snip] Als

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][nova] how to upgrade from v1 to v2?

2015-09-25 Thread Andrew Laski
On 09/25/15 at 07:44pm, Rochelle Grober wrote: Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Mark Voelker's message of 2015-09-25 17:42:24 +: On Sep 25, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > > I'd like to clarify something. > > On 9/25/15, 12:16 PM, "Mark Voelker" wrote: > [big snip] >> Also w

Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress] Congress Usecases VM

2015-09-25 Thread Shiv Haris
Thanks Alex, Zhou, I get errors from congress when I do a re-join. These errors seem to due to the order in which the services are coming up. Hence I still depend on running stack.sh after the VM is up and running. Please try out the new VM - also advise if you need to add any of your use cases

  1   2   >