On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:25 AM Adam Heczko <ahec...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> Are we discussing mod_wsgi and Keystone or OpenStack as a general? > If Keystone specific use case, then probably Apache provides broadest > choice of tested external authenticators. > I'm not against uwsgi at all, but to be honest expectation that nginx > could substitute Apache in terms of authentication providers is simply > unrealistic. > uwsgi isn't a replacement for Apache. It's a replacement for mod_wsgi. It just so happens that it does let you use user web servers if that's what your usecase dictates. As a Keystone developer I don't want to tell deployers that they have to use Apache. It should be their choice. Since Apache is the most common web server in our community I think we should continue to provide example configurations and guidance for it. -- David
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
