Re: [opensource-dev] Display names, again.

Forwarding your questions through the PR channels, Lance. Although, from the documentation provided by the Lab so far, the answer to question one is 'no'. On 20/08/2010 4:38 PM, Lance Corrimal wrote: > Is it just me or did the lindens stop replying to this topic? > > > ok, lets try this again.

[opensource-dev] Display names, again.

Is it just me or did the lindens stop replying to this topic? ok, lets try this again. Here are some distict questions, and I would like to see distinct "yes" or "no" answers from linden labs employees, and I would like it a lot if, in case no one of the lindens on the list can answer my ques

Re: [opensource-dev] Update Linux Build Documentation, please?

Of course I'd only do that -after- providing the shared build scripts. -- cg On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Lance Corrimal wrote: > Am Friday 20 August 2010 schrieb CG Linden: > > There is method to our madness... > > I put up a wiki page explaining our automated build process at: > > > > http

Re: [opensource-dev] Update Linux Build Documentation, please?

Am Friday 20 August 2010 schrieb CG Linden: > There is method to our madness... > I put up a wiki page explaining our automated build process at: > > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Automated_Build_System > > Now I wouldn't mind ripping develop.py apart and spreading the guts > into the top level

Re: [opensource-dev] Open Inventory Transfer

On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:56:29 -0700, Ricky wrote: > Very good question, and was the reason for my note bout accidental > inventory transfers. > > The solution I alluded to was to pop up an "are you sure" style dialog > box. However, I hate those with a passion. So I'm fishing for more > optimal

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

On 20/08/2010 2:51 PM, Baloo Uriza wrote: On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:53:18 -0700, Daniel Smith wrote: On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Baloo Uriza wrote: On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 10:15:14 -0700, Daniel Smith wrote: I'll ask the Lindens a direct question: What will you do to prevent others from

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:42:37 -0700, Bryon Ruxton wrote: > On 8/19/10 7:20 PM, "Argent Stonecutter" > wrote: > >> On 2010-08-19, at 14:09, Michael Schlenker wrote: >>> Its a special case of the general case, i didn't check but I'm pretty >>> sure 'Agent Smith' is taken by someone. If it is and yo

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:53:18 -0700, Daniel Smith wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Baloo Uriza > wrote: > >> On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 10:15:14 -0700, Daniel Smith wrote: >> >> > I'll ask the Lindens a direct question: >> > >> > What will you do to prevent others from using my username as thei

[opensource-dev] newview should be a diff lisc

if you really wanna help out the community and have advancement tale newview seperate it and allow it to contain changes that can be closed source. the rest of the projects/libs should be lgpl. just my two cents. Anyone wanting to have a closed source viewer has to basically rewrite newview at thi

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers? Correction

On 8/19/10 7:20 PM, "Argent Stonecutter" wrote: > On 2010-08-19, at 14:09, Michael Schlenker wrote: >> Its a special case of the general case, i didn't check but I'm pretty sure >> 'Agent Smith' is taken by someone. If it is and you >> had your way it would not be possible to use that name. > >

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

On 8/19/10 7:20 PM, "Argent Stonecutter" wrote: > On 2010-08-19, at 14:09, Michael Schlenker wrote: >> Its a special case of the general case, i didn't check but I'm pretty sure >> 'Agent Smith' is taken by someone. If it is and you >> had your way it would not be possible to use that name. > >

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

On 2010-08-19, at 14:09, Michael Schlenker wrote: > Its a special case of the general case, i didn't check but I'm pretty sure > 'Agent Smith' is taken by someone. If it is and you > had your way it would not be possible to use that name. Yes. So? The homograph issue needs to be addressed in any

[opensource-dev] Mac Build Failing

I've pulled rev 11450 (tip at the moment), then cd'd into indra ran develop.py and the compile failed. More info on procedures I used after the system specs. Hardware Overview: Model Name: Mac mini aluminum Model Identifier: Macmini4,1 Processor Name: Intel Core 2 Duo Processor

Re: [opensource-dev] Open Inventory Transfer

One way to eliminate the possibility of accidental transfers is a mandatory confirmation window on the transfer when it's done via dragging an edit window. When the item is dragged, a confirmation box wouldn't be necessary..just when dragging the window.On the other hand, I don't know of

[opensource-dev] Snowstorm Daily Scrum Summary - 08/19/2010

Date: Thu Aug 19 Daily Scrum Summary also available online: https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Snowstorm_Daily_Scrum_Archive == GENERAL NOTES == Q is OOO for the next few days Remember to update the Sprint Backlog! == DAILY SCRUM == === Aimee === PAST Staged some more build fixes from Snowglobe

Re: [opensource-dev] Open Inventory Transfer

Very good question, and was the reason for my note bout accidental inventory transfers. The solution I alluded to was to pop up an "are you sure" style dialog box. However, I hate those with a passion. So I'm fishing for more optimal solutions. It is possible there may be no good solution to th

Re: [opensource-dev] To Pie or To List

Either way, I still see it as of little use with objects I own or am the creator of! As regards the order for objects for which I am neither creator nor owner I have no suggestion. The current order might make sense. Then again, Do I ever have permission to /Delete/ someone else's objects? Not s

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

Daniel Smith : > Thanks for playing. Just sign up last week? That's rude, unnecessary, and arrogant. I joined in 2006, and I think Baloo is quite likely correct. There's no call to insult someone just because they dare to disagree with you. Let's try to keep it civil. DC/DL ___

Re: [opensource-dev] Update Linux Build Documentation, please?

CG, I get not found errors when trying to access the hg repository for the build system. Is this repository not operational yet or is the link incorrect in the doc. Thx! Mike From: opensource-dev-boun...@lists.secondlife.com [mailto:opensource-dev-boun...@lists.secondlife.com] On Behalf Of C

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

Seems like twitter has a pretty good solution. Display names are unique. And your login account isn't public so you have better security. Default your display name to your current SL name. After that people can request the name they want. As far as scripts, chat, everything else, that use your

Re: [opensource-dev] Update Linux Build Documentation, please?

There is method to our madness... I put up a wiki page explaining our automated build process at: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Automated_Build_System Now I wouldn't mind ripping develop.py apart and spreading the guts into the top level build.sh script, but don't have time to do that right now

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Baloo Uriza wrote: > On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 10:15:14 -0700, Daniel Smith wrote: > > > I'll ask the Lindens a direct question: > > > > What will you do to prevent others from using my username as their > > displayname? > > I'm going to hazard to guess the answer is "n

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 10:15:14 -0700, Daniel Smith wrote: > I'll ask the Lindens a direct question: > > What will you do to prevent others from using my username as their > displayname? I'm going to hazard to guess the answer is "nothing." If anything, this brings SL into better parity with the

Re: [opensource-dev] Update Linux Build Documentation, pl ease?

Aleric, you made a great job with your documention effort! https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Compiling_the_viewer_(Linux) now this page is surely more useful than in the past. However, it's still a very long document (not your fault, there's very old stuff there) and I think we can make it even ea

Re: [opensource-dev] Pie menu ideas (was: Re: Open Viewer Development Announcement)

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Opensource Obscure wrote: --snip-- > > As always, providing users with the ability to choose a different > system (that is, pie menu) may be ideal - but again, this shouldn't > have an high priority. I agree with that. Maybe a simple debug setting or a checkbox or

Re: [opensource-dev] Viewer-external vs viewer-development

On 2010-08-19 14:15, Kitty wrote: > Sorry if this has already come up, but is there any ETA on when all of > viewer-external (*not* Snowglobe) will make it into viewer-development? > > I.e. the last SVN code drop from 2 days ago changes > LLViewerObject::getItemID() to "getAttachedItemID()", and

Re: [opensource-dev] Version numbering

On 2010-08-19 12:08, Trilo Byte wrote: > Now that 2.1.1 has been released, shouldn't nightly builds be labeled 2.1.2? Yes, probably... still getting that sorted out. ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com

Re: [opensource-dev] SSH authentication

On 2010-08-19 8:55, Boroondas Gupte wrote: * * IMPEDIMENTS * * * (minor) Can't get ssh authentication to hg.secondlife.com/bitbucket.org working * * * * What exactly isn't working t

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

Am Thursday 19 August 2010 schrieb Bryon Ruxton: > As I conveyed in the blog, it could be just a warning rather than a > complete restriction. Such as: "Please be aware that this is a > resident's username. Any deceptive attempt using this resident's > name is prohibited..." etc in the case of a m

Re: [opensource-dev] Snowstorm Backlog Request: SNOW-766

Aleric - this seems like a perfectly reasonable improvement to include in our general build improvements task for this sprint. If you would please prepare a public clone of viewer-development in which this patch is successfully applied, I'll get it reviewed from there and pulled into viewer-

Re: [opensource-dev] Open Inventory Transfer

On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 17:25:05 -0700, Ricky wrote: > Well, she was recently instructed by my dad (an advanced user like > myself) to send him a notecard she was editing. She asked how. My dad > instructed her to "drag it to the IM window." This she knew how to > find. She then complained that it

Re: [opensource-dev] Snowstorm, JIRA and versions

On 19 August 2010 13:04, Carlo Wood wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:45:14PM -0400, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote: > > > for clarification...). If correct, I'll start moving JIRAs from SNOW > > > to VWR when I see fit. > > > > That's correct. > > I can see some inconvenience arising from re

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

On 8/19/10 12:09 PM, "Michael Schlenker" wrote: > Am 19.08.2010 um 11:51 schrieb Argent Stonecutter: > >> >> On 2010-08-18, at 13:19, Michael Schlenker wrote: Can you elaborate on what kind of RP would require you to be able to set your display name to "Argent Stonecutter" >> >>> Sur

Re: [opensource-dev] Update Linux Build Documentation, please?

That document has been recently (pre-viewer-development and hg) updated by me, including adding all the caveats that exist for building standalone. Which part does give you problems? Building on standalone never was easy-- in fact, before my update it was impossible without being guided personally

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

Following up on myself.. On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Daniel Smith wrote: > What will you do to prevent others from using my username as their > displayname? > > And it's not just a display issue. What happens with chat and im logs? Are > they going to only show the displayname? >From

Re: [opensource-dev] To Pie or To List

I think that "Report Abuse" should always be the top-most menu entry in every menu, so that it's easy to find and quick to access. Report first, ask questions later. Why mute or TP away, or HAHAHA just be mature about something, when you can Run to Daddy Linden Lab and Report the suckers!!! On W

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

Daniel Smith : >The focus here is identity within SL. We work hard to craft our AVs >and our reputations. If you want to use your analogy, you would be >the only david_ch...@somesluser.com. Now, do you want someone >impersonating that? Because that's the sort of thing I am getting at >with the

Re: [opensource-dev] Snowstorm, JIRA and versions

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:45:14PM -0400, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote: > > for clarification...). If correct, I'll start moving JIRAs from SNOW > > to VWR when I see fit. > > That's correct. I can see some inconvenience arising from renaming SNOW's to VWR's. We use 'SNOW-xyz' a lot in (text

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

Well it must be obvious for any user that anyone they see or hear or receive an IM from is using either a user name or a display name. And by obvious I mean "validated by the server during the transaction", not "forged by another viewer which can pretend to use any user name". In other words, any t

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

Am 19.08.2010 um 21:30 schrieb Daniel Smith: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Michael Schlenker > wrote: >> >> >> How about a display option in the viewer that can 'highlight' the fact that >> your display name is the same as your username >> (different colour, font or an other UI hint). >

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:37 PM, David M Chess wrote: > > Daniel Smith : > >>I still have not heard a definitive answer as to what gets logged in >>IM and Chat. >>Forget the "display" for a moment.  What do you want to have logged as >>"Michael Schlenker" >>that you did not write? > > Not to be a

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

Daniel Smith : >I still have not heard a definitive answer as to what gets logged in >IM and Chat. >Forget the "display" for a moment. What do you want to have logged as >"Michael Schlenker" >that you did not write? Not to be a wet blanket, but anyone can sign their email "David Chess" right no

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Michael Schlenker wrote: > > > How about a display option in the viewer that can 'highlight' the fact that > your display name is the same as your username > (different colour, font or an other UI hint). > That would prevent many of the imposter issues, as it wou

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

Am 19.08.2010 um 11:51 schrieb Argent Stonecutter: > > On 2010-08-18, at 13:19, Michael Schlenker wrote: >>> Can you elaborate on what kind of RP would require you to be able to set >>> your display name to "Argent Stonecutter" > >> Sure. Anywhere you wanna have uniform appearance, like having

Re: [opensource-dev] no "allow create landmark" in 2.1?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 8/19/2010 10:37 AM, Lance Corrimal wrote: > is it just my failing eyesight, or is there no "allow create landmark" > checkbox in "about land" in 2.1 (snowglobe 2.1.0 r3622) ??? It's not there in 2.1.1.208114 either >_>; -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE---

[opensource-dev] Viewer-external vs viewer-development

Sorry if this has already come up, but is there any ETA on when all of viewer-external (*not* Snowglobe) will make it into viewer-development? I.e. the last SVN code drop from 2 days ago changes LLViewerObject::getItemID() to "getAttachedItemID()", and all "childXXX" calls on LLView are replaced w

Re: [opensource-dev] Open Viewer Development Announcement

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:41:38AM -0400, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote: > We still do require a Contribution Agreement, for good and valid reasons I've > explained many times - most notably that it allows us to improve our license > in > the future. Had we not required the CA in the past, we

Re: [opensource-dev] Open Viewer Development Announcement

Marine Kelley : > That would be awesome. I know there are reasons behind the removal of the pie menu and its replacement by a well known list menu, but PLEASE I am so > much more productive and less frustrated with the old pie menu ! Muscle memory and size of the clickable areas and all that.

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 8/19/2010 10:15 AM, Daniel Smith wrote: > And it's not just a display issue. What happens with chat and im logs? Are > they going to only show the displayname? I have no idea what it will be, but I'm hoping for IMs it will continue to use the us

[opensource-dev] no "allow create landmark" in 2.1?

is it just my failing eyesight, or is there no "allow create landmark" checkbox in "about land" in 2.1 (snowglobe 2.1.0 r3622) ??? bye, LC ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please

Re: [opensource-dev] Open Viewer Development Announcement

On 20/08/2010 3:16 AM, Henri Beauchamp wrote: > On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:04:21 -0400, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote: > >>On 2010-08-18 14:14, Aidan Thornton wrote: >>> On 8/18/10, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote: While there were some good things about the v1 implementation of pie >>

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

Am Thursday 19 August 2010 schrieb Kelly Linden: > No. Account names must be unique. No new user can create ann.otoole > OR annotoole as a username, that name is taken by you. Can someone else set the DISPLAY NAME to "Lance Corrimal" ??? bye, LC ___ P

Re: [opensource-dev] Open Viewer Development Announcement

That would be awesome. I know there are reasons behind the removal of the pie menu and its replacement by a well known list menu, but PLEASE I am so much more productive and less frustrated with the old pie menu ! Muscle memory and size of the clickable areas and all that. Simply put with the list

Re: [opensource-dev] Open Viewer Development Announcement

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 8/19/2010 10:16 AM, Henri Beauchamp wrote: > A smarter approach would be to automatically move the cursor itself to > the center of the pie menu (without moving the latter to avoid an > annoying "drifting" effect) when you click on a sub-menu. >

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Kelly Linden wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Aidan Thornton wrote: > >> On 8/19/10, Kelly Linden wrote: >> > I just wanted to point out that this theoretical new user's username >> would >> > be baloo198731, it would not be baloo198731.resident. Th

Re: [opensource-dev] Open Viewer Development Announcement

On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:04:21 -0400, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote: > On 2010-08-18 14:14, Aidan Thornton wrote: > > On 8/18/10, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote: > >> While there were some good things about the v1 implementation of pie > >> menus, they also had some flaws - such as not openi

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

I'll ask the Lindens a direct question: What will you do to prevent others from using my username as their displayname? I dont care what people do in group tags - that is different. I dont want to see my name (in any form, uppercase, lowercase, with or without dots or spaces, etc.) used as a dis

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Aidan Thornton wrote: > On 8/19/10, Kelly Linden wrote: > > I just wanted to point out that this theoretical new user's username > would > > be baloo198731, it would not be baloo198731.resident. The 'Resident' > isn't > > really a part of a new user's identity. I

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

No. Account names must be unique. No new user can create ann.otoole OR annotoole as a username, that name is taken by you. - Kelly On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Ann Otoole wrote: > Do I understand you correctly that new accounts can make their name > anything including existing account name

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

On 8/19/10, Kelly Linden wrote: > I just wanted to point out that this theoretical new user's username would > be baloo198731, it would not be baloo198731.resident. The 'Resident' isn't > really a part of a new user's identity. It is only shown to viewers that do > not support display names and le

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

Do I understand you correctly that new accounts can make their name anything including existing account names? From: Kelly Linden To: Jesse Barnett Cc: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com; Baloo Uriza Sent: Thu, August 19, 2010 11:27:21 AM Subject: Re: [ope

[opensource-dev] Version numbering

Now that 2.1.1 has been released, shouldn't nightly builds be labeled 2.1.2? TriloByte Zanzibar ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmo

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Jesse Barnett wrote: > baloo198731.residentPlenty of names available. > I just wanted to point out that this theoretical new user's username would be baloo198731, it would not be baloo198731.resident. The 'Resident' isn't really a part of a new user's ide

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

Lol, another peanut thrown from the back rows, but doesn't "Compatibility with openID" that mean that we may start seeing "christa...@facebook.comresident" in a few years? (Note: I am not saying that this has been stated or is acceptable to anyone any visible timeframe and am not trying to start a

Re: [opensource-dev] Windows Build of Snowstorm (Viewer 2.1.1)

I had a successful windows, C++ Express 2005, build and the patches are included here. https://nic...@bitbucket.org/NickyP/viewer-development From: Zak Escher To: opensource-dev Mailing List Sent: Thu, August 19, 2010 8:23:58 AM Subject: [opensource-dev] Wind

Re: [opensource-dev] Windows Build of Snowstorm (Viewer 2.1.1) (LLKDU)

That's because of the LLKDU issue that Merov is currently working to fix. You can work around if for now by replacing the llkdu.dll that comes with the development viewer with one from the release viewer. Aimee. On 19 Aug 2010, at 14:23, Zak Escher wrote: > I have tried every build of Viewer 2

[opensource-dev] Windows Build of Snowstorm (Viewer 2.1.1)

I have tried every build of Viewer 2.1.1 since Sunday (8/19/2010) and all have crashed on launch. Is there a proper place to report these issues? -- - Zak Escher email: zak.esc...@gmail.com Join me in Second Life http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=f76730f9dee0d54e3cc51e29da87373a

[opensource-dev] SSH authentication (was: Snowstorm Daily Scrum Summary - 08/18/2010)

[Oz, sorry for the duplicate. I've sent this from a wrong address originally, so the list rejected it.] Hi Oz On 08/19/2010 04:57 AM, Esbee Linden (Sarah Hutchinson) wrote: > Date: Wed Aug 18 > Also available > here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Snowstorm_Daily_Scrum_Archive > > [...] > * > *

Re: [opensource-dev] Please - enough about the CA

Argent Stonecutter a écrit : On 2010-08-19, at 04:09, Gareth Nelson wrote: > None of those projects have an agreement that allows proprietary versions I think Qt has LGPL and proprietary licensing now. You're right : http://qt.nokia.com/downloads ___

Re: [opensource-dev] vehicles got some problem ?

On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:39:36 +0900, Rustam Rakhimov wrote: > Hi VW developers [developers are future] > > > I want to ask you question about vehicles > > As I know vehicles got some problem in OpenSim isn't it ? > > so is there any news about Vehicles in Opensim. I want it to run some > car sc

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

Is RegAPI still going to be available with last names or is that being updated too? On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Baloo Uriza wrote: > On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:04:19 -0700, Kelly Linden wrote: > >> 'Resident' is just the final last name, and is treated specially on new >> viewers to be hidden fr

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

baloo198731.residentPlenty of names available. This has absolutely nothing to do with "We listened to our users" as this is not what we asked for. Pyske figured it out in the SLU thread. This is a move to the openID format and this is confirmed when you look at the Display Name wiki page:

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:04:19 -0700, Kelly Linden wrote: > 'Resident' is just the final last name, and is treated specially on new > viewers to be hidden from view when displayed. So new users won't have the choice of picking a last name anymore? Isn't that going to severely limit the number of

Re: [opensource-dev] Pie menu ideas (was: Re: Open Viewer Development Announcement)

I got used to the pie menu and got comfortable with it, but I still think the pie menu is a bit weird for new unexperienced users. The current menu resembles the menu you may find across many applications with large userbases. Overall, I think the current menu is a better solution. A rework o

[opensource-dev] Workaround for build issues on Gentoo Linux; Using CMake directly instead of develop.py (was: Update Linux Build Documentation, please?)

Hi Tapple Welcome to the opensource-dev and to Snowglobe and snowstorm development/testing! On 08/19/2010 04:36 AM, Tapple Gao wrote: > I'm on Gentoo Linux, and the build instructions for Linux [1] have > never worked for me (./develop.py cmake; ./develop.py build). For default (i.e. non-standal

Re: [opensource-dev] Update Linux Build Documentation, pl ease?

On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 22:36:32 -0400, Tapple Gao wrote: > Also, the build instructions have a lot of caveats for > standalone builders, which, as someone who has never even been > able to complete a non-standalone build, I am rather confused > by. > > So, I'd like it if someone could update the l

Re: [opensource-dev] Please - enough about the CA

On 2010-08-19, at 04:09, Gareth Nelson wrote: > None of those projects have an agreement that allows proprietary versions I think Qt has LGPL and proprietary licensing now. ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife

Re: [opensource-dev] To Pie or To List

On 2010-08-18, at 19:23, Ricky wrote: > Furthermore, if I don't have the > privileges to return an item the return option should be either > removed or grayed out. This is actually a problem in 1.x as well. ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information ava

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

On 2010-08-18, at 13:19, Michael Schlenker wrote: >> Can you elaborate on what kind of RP would require you to be able to set >> your display name to "Argent Stonecutter" > Sure. Anywhere you wanna have uniform appearance, like having a bunch of > 'Agent Smith' AVs in black suits to give the >

Re: [opensource-dev] Please - enough about the CA

None of those projects have an agreement that allows proprietary versions On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 4:12 AM, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Henri Beauchamp wrote: > > SL is the ONLY so-called (but actually still not, obviously: a Canada-Dry > LGPL, perhaps ?)

Re: [opensource-dev] Open Viewer Development Announcement

One thing I liked about the pie menu is the area where the mouse click needs to take place increases in width as you move away from the center, making it easy to make the desired pick. I often find when navigating nested rectangular menus that it's difficult to keep the mouse hovered in the desired