Hey,
Anil Gulecha wrote:
> If you can hack around with the scripts, you can add this to BeleniX,
> the opensolaris LiveCD.
>
> If your application isnt very big (under 1 mb).. you can easily add that
> to the miniroot of BeleniX, so the distributed version (On USB or CD)
> will contian your appli
Hi,
I want to get various disk parameters including disk serial
numbers (or disk IDs). How do I do that on thumper with OpenSoalris?
Is there any equivalent command for hdparm on Solaris?
Regards,
_Atul
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolari
Ehlo,
Belenix is Ok. I have read and install Belenix ... and downloading the
remastering kit.
Not yet success.
Anyway, i have FTP access @Home, not @Office. with speed just 5kbs :D
In your opinion which one is more appropriate for "server" ? As i see
Belenix is targeted to "DESKTOP",
i prefer Sch
It's a very nice video, two issues, one the MB they had picked has a USB issue
on the kernel boot sequence and second the video is low resolution, which
suggest the vender ID and device number for this video card used in the video
is not supported is, you can tell by the big desktop icons and t
This mail has been posted in virtual console discussion alias. The
broadcasting is for those who may be interested in this feature on solaris.
The new release for "Virtual Console" is available now, you can download
and try for fun:
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/vconsole/Downloads/
There is
Subramanian Chockalingam wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have production Sun Fire v240's with Solaris 9 running and planning to
>upgrade to Solaris 10.
>
Please try and stay on topic, OpenSolaris.
Ian
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensola
On 4/19/07, Subramanian Chockalingam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I have production Sun Fire v240's with Solaris 9 running and planning to
upgrade to Solaris 10. Its all to be done through WAN Boot Installation
using Flash Archive. What I'm worried about the limitation of Solaris 10 WAN
boot allo
On 18/04/07, John Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I will agree with creating two partitions, The Solaris installer only seems to
see the FAT32 file system correctly, from when it calls fdisk from what I can
tell the code is not still not yet there, and there should be a RFE for
including NT
Hi all,
The installation video has been updated to post-nv_55 installer for your use.
Thanks to Mike Patino, Ginnie Wray, and Lynne Thompson for their hard work to
do this. For the updated installation video, see
http://frsun.downloads.edgesuite.net/sun/07C00892/media/demos/OpenSolarisDualBoot-
Hi,
I have production Sun Fire v240's with Solaris 9 running and planning to
upgrade to Solaris 10. Its all to be done through WAN Boot Installation using
Flash Archive. What I'm worried about the limitation of Solaris 10 WAN boot
allowing only 2 GBytes image and fails if its more? Is this only
I will agree with creating two partitions, The Solaris installer only seems to
see the FAT32 file system correctly, from when it calls fdisk from what I can
tell the code is not still not yet there, and there should be a RFE for
including NTFS. and so if you do not setup even just a small parti
On 18/04/07, xiaoming zhu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, I'd like to play the Solaris Express, but I cannot spend much
effort/time to debug the kernel, I just want to have a simple tool/way to
update/recover the system.
If you install Solaris Express, that's exactly what you're opening
yoursel
On 18/04/07, Thomas Rampelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
> On 17/04/07, Chung Hang Christopher Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That is not my problem. I would not bother about this
>> if I was more than happy to drop in a DVD or a bunch
>> of CDs to 'upgrade' each box
>
>
On 18/04/07, xiaoming zhu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/18/07, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Solaris 10 already supports that feature if you use Sun Update
> Manager, if you're talking about updating.
I have a question please:
Does Solaris 10 support to boot directly from ZFS no
When I try and install Solaris 10 it asks for the software 5 disk. I do not
know what it is asking for. It says I can skip the install but then it just
wants to reboot and it comes back to the same place asking for the software 5
disk. Can anyone help???
This message posted from opensolar
This is mainly of interest to the zfs-discuss alias, but I
had said I would post the availability of this kit to
the main alias too, so here it is:
This tarball;
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/install/files/zfsboot-kit-20060418.i386.tar.bz2
contains the necessary files for patching an
From: Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Google indexes PDFs now, and I have gotten hit results from google
>searches that were from docs.sun.com many times.
When I want to get a snippet of info, I much prefer a web page than a 90 page
PDF. When I want to explore a subject in depth, I much pr
Correct, there are the four images you referenced available on this page:
http://developers.sun.com/solaris/downloads/solaris_apps/index.jsp
Those are the past 3 Solaris 10 releasese plus the current Solaris Express
Developer Edition.
But if you dig down one layer to the Solaris Express, Develo
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 08:13 -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
> If you're talking about *ugprading* between releases, it is not
> flawless for Ubuntu. I should know, that's the only Linux distribution
> I run.
Indeed-- I find myself doing a complete Ubuntu reinstall every few
months, because continually
Tom Haynes wrote:
Elton wrote:
I have setup a small (5 machines) development/test network using
Solaris 10 11/06 (I know this is an OpenSolaris forum). I have an
LDAP server configured and running which also serves as the Home
Directory Server.
The problem I have encountered is when users a
Also, since I am running LDAP the setup instructions for LDAP include loading
all the auto_mount files into the directory server. But, in the Home Dir setup
Instructions the user is instructed to set automount: to files in the
nsswitch.conf file? Not sure why, what is the purpose of loading th
Elton wrote:
I have setup a small (5 machines) development/test network using Solaris 10
11/06 (I know this is an OpenSolaris forum). I have an LDAP server configured
and running which also serves as the Home Directory Server.
The problem I have encountered is when users access there machines
lloy0076 wrote:
This discussion seems to be spinning around in circles. There is a lot
of benefit to an "apt" like packaging system but clearly a good number
of organisations and individuals have gotten by with Solaris without
such a packaging system.
That is neither wrong, nor right. It just
Shawn Walker wrote:
On 17/04/07, Chung Hang Christopher Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That is not my problem. I would not bother about this
if I was more than happy to drop in a DVD or a bunch
of CDs to 'upgrade' each box
Except you don't even have to do that. All you need is an ISO image,
n
Shawn Walker wrote:
On 17/04/07, Chung Hang Christopher Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thank you. the concept of apt/yum repositories seems
to be very alien here.
No, it is not. You just have a hard time believing that we don't
embrace it as the "one true way" of doing things. I think the poi
First of all, thank you answer my questions.
On 4/18/07, a b <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I doubt it. BFU is meant for an ad-hoc update on a single system for a
Solaris developer. Not end user, not sysadmin, but a developer. Which
implies that said developer has an indepth understanding of Solari
Shawn Walker wrote:
Sun Connection is very easy to use to manage updates and is all you're
likely to need in a *production* environment. So I don't understand
your compliant. Given that you have never indicated actual usage of
it, I think it is unfair for you to be critical of it.
Upgrades are e
> This problem is not related to the update manager
> from what I know.
> Instead, this seems to be a problem with Sun's patch
> database (which
> continues to have issues).
That might be so, but the net end result is still the same: it does not work
correctly and especially not to my satisfactio
I have setup a small (5 machines) development/test network using Solaris 10
11/06 (I know this is an OpenSolaris forum). I have an LDAP server configured
and running which also serves as the Home Directory Server.
The problem I have encountered is when users access there machines they can not
* xiaoming zhu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 4/18/07, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >Solaris 10 already supports that feature if you use Sun Update
> >Manager, if you're talking about updating.
>
>
> I have a question please:
>
> Does Solaris 10 support to boot directly fro
On 4/18/07, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Solaris 10 already supports that feature if you use Sun Update
Manager, if you're talking about updating.
I have a question please:
Does Solaris 10 support to boot directly from ZFS now? How can I update to
this feature with Solaris 10? I
On 18/04/07, MC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As soon as Ubuntu supported "click this button to upgrade your entire OS flawlessly
from the internet", that feature became a standard for everyone to meet.
I take it as a given that Solaris/OpenSolaris will eventually support such a
feature. I hope
On 18/04/07, a b <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can be critical of the Sun Update Connection because I was a paying
customer for one year.
To be fair and objective (and not be a "Sun PR channel", as some feel) Sun
Update connection never worked right.
It shows patches for Solaris 8 on a Solaris
On 18/04/07, Manish Chakravarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All,
I downloaded the tarball and it got built in SXDE with any modifications
(using the bundled Sun Studio 11)
It has pretty looking GTK fonts and icons.
Now my question is: how do i make a .pkg out of it?
(it is clear the
vim7.0
Section 1 of the Contributor Agreement [1] states:
1. Contribution means any source code, object code, patch, tool,
sample, graphic, specification, manual, documentation, e-mail,
comment, posting, communication or any other material posted or
submitted by You to a Project.
Am I c
Amey Abhyankar wrote:
I am curious to know if you select ZFS file system while installing Solaris 10
on a SATA hdd.
Not currently possible. The work required to do this
has not been completed yet.
James C. McPherson
--
Solaris kernel software engineer
Sun Microsystems
__
I am curious to know if you select ZFS file system while installing Solaris 10
on a SATA hdd.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Very imp question is what is the size of your hdd ?
I strongly recomand to make 2 partitions for Windows XP
Leave remaining space for Solaris.
- Format C:/ drive with [b]NTFS[/b] file system
- Format D:/ drive with [b]FAT32[/b] file system
I am not Soalris expert, but most linux OS's dont
"Anil Gulecha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you can hack around with the scripts, you can add this to BeleniX, the
> opensolaris LiveCD.
>
> If your application isnt very big (under 1 mb).. you can easily add that to
> the miniroot of BeleniX, so the distributed version (On USB or CD) will
> co
I joined this forum several weeks ago. I sent message here regarding to
delivery of "Solaris 10 OS" kit & also "Start kit" . I did not receive it. I
sent order in early 2006.
Well, today I received "Solaris 10 OS" kit which contains 3 DVD's. 1 DVD
contains Solaris 10 for x86 systems, other DV
On 4/14/07, Eko Budhi Suprasetiawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello all,
i am new to Open Solaris, but have a demand to have my own OpenSolaris
installer,
which basically a simple design like this :
Add a software (e.g Moodle learning management software) as
pre-installed
so that, if i distri
Hello,
Thanks, but webstart is actually request user to "install separately"
...
what we require is adding a pre-installed application, which require no
user interaction.
Furthermore, we need to remove some package from Solaris, which not
required anymore.
Best regards,
Eko Budhi S
On Fri, 200
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of the
intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply
e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
Any unau
Lalit Mittal
Managed Hosting Services
Computer Sciences Corporation
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
India: 91-120-3064000 Extn. 8229
US : 1-302-781-1010 Extn. 8229
---
No. GNOME 2.18 is targeted to B65 now.
Please see:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/jds/documents/jds_schedule/
Harry
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 23:52 -0700, Girts Zeltins wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Will it be based on GNOME 2.18?
>
> Regards,
> Girts
>
>
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
Alan DuBoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No system to date is without sacrifice in some way for Solaris. I'd like
> to hear a lot more of how we can make Solaris be itself. I mean this in
> regards to pkgsrc wanting things in /usr/pkg, belenix wanting /usr/foss,
> and even Solaris using /usr/sf
> > In practice, the convenience approach can only work
> so much, until the
> > whole model collapses. It might work very well for
> a single desktop
> > system, but after a certain people to systems
> ratio, the whole model
> > can't support the needs of the user or users any
> more.
> >
> > U
metadbs on two local disks is a common used configuration.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
48 matches
Mail list logo
