velopment] Windows 64-bit version tests
>
> On 2010-02-16 00:35, karrbd wrote:
> > The new inf file you provided works on Vista x64 and Win7 x64.
>
> So I assume that it would work on XP 64-bit too, am I right?
Just tried that too, yes it also works on XP 64.
> > It inst
That looks great, I'm looking forward to using it.
> -Original Message-
> From: Xiaofan Chen [mailto:xiaof...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 4:12 PM
> To: karrbd
> Cc: openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
> Subject: Re: [Openocd-development] Windo
On Monday 15 February 2010, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> I wonder whether that would work as fast as ftd2xx... I see that there
> won't be support for isochronous transfers, and I've heard somewhere
> that this is important for applications like OpenOCD?
There's no OpenOCD code I've seen that request
On 2010-02-16 01:12, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> Soon you will be able to use libftdi 1.0 which is based on libusb 1.0.
I wonder whether that would work as fast as ftd2xx... I see that there
won't be support for isochronous transfers, and I've heard somewhere
that this is important for applications li
On 2010-02-16 00:35, karrbd wrote:
> The new inf file you provided works on Vista x64 and Win7 x64.
So I assume that it would work on XP 64-bit too, am I right?
> It installs from that inf file on WinXP 32-bit as well, but I assume that
> 32-bit users would not install from that package anyway si
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 7:35 AM, karrbd wrote:
> Ideally I would run these drivers outside of test mode, but I don't have
> time now to make a verified+signed driver with a code-signing certificate.
> It looks like the inf file and driver will work on x64 in case someone out
> there wants to do th
February 15, 2010 9:43 AM
> To: openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
> Subject: Re: [Openocd-development] Windows 64-bit version tests
>
> On 2010-02-15 08:20, karrbd wrote:
> > I had success with WinXP 64 by changing libusb-win32_ft2232_driver.inf
as
> > follows.
> >
inal Message-
> From: openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de
[mailto:openocd-development-
> boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Freddie Chopin
> Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2010 7:02 AM
> To: openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
> Subject: Re: [Openocd-development] Windo
On 2010-02-12 21:21, karrbd wrote:
> I tried a few Windows OSes with this 64-bit build:
>
> When installing the driver on Win7 x64, Vista x64, and WinXP x64 it fails
> with "A service section in this INF is invalid."
>
> I tried this with JTAGkey2 and Olimex ARM-USB-TINY.
>
> Let me know what other
Freddie Chopin wrote:
> I've got snapshots of 0.4.0-rc1-dev compiled for 64-bit Windows systems,
> but I cannot test that (I use 32-bit Windows). I can produce releases of
> 64-bit versions (just like the "regular" releases on my website), but
> I'd like to test the executable, drivers, and the
On Saturday 16 January 2010, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> I was thinking about providing developement packages (whole tree [exe,
> scripts, dlls, pdf, info, etc.]), but without installer. The main
> problem is that on my webpage I don't have enough:
> 1. bandwith
> 2. quota
> If only OpenOCD could pub
On 2010-01-16 16:57, Dean Glazeski wrote:
> Do you have a tutorial online for doing the cross compile process? That
> may be a more viable solution than trying to post development versions
> of the software. I'd at least like to know the steps involved :). If
> it's scriptable, I may put togethe
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> On 2010-01-16 14:14, Thomas Kindler wrote:
> > Could you also provide a recent build for normal Win32?! I tried to
> > compile one myself a few days ago, but failed to get the libftdi stuff
> > working.
>
> I was thinking about providing de
On 2010-01-16 14:14, Thomas Kindler wrote:
> Could you also provide a recent build for normal Win32?! I tried to
> compile one myself a few days ago, but failed to get the libftdi stuff
> working.
I was thinking about providing developement packages (whole tree [exe,
scripts, dlls, pdf, info, et
Hi Freddie!
Freddie Chopin wrote:
> I've got snapshots of 0.4.0-rc1-dev compiled for 64-bit Windows systems,
> but I cannot test that (I use 32-bit Windows). I can produce releases of
> 64-bit versions (just like the "regular" releases on my website), but
> I'd like to test the executable, driv
I've got snapshots of 0.4.0-rc1-dev compiled for 64-bit Windows systems,
but I cannot test that (I use 32-bit Windows). I can produce releases of
64-bit versions (just like the "regular" releases on my website), but
I'd like to test the executable, drivers, and the whole package. If
anyone care
16 matches
Mail list logo
