On Monday 15 February 2010, Freddie Chopin wrote: > I wonder whether that would work as fast as ftd2xx... I see that there > won't be support for isochronous transfers, and I've heard somewhere > that this is important for applications like OpenOCD?
There's no OpenOCD code I've seen that requests isochronous transfers. Using isochronous transfers for JTAG would be a Bad Idea. Among other things, they don't have the same robustness guarantess as bulk transfers. Bulk has at least a way to retransmit after errors ... ISO is only "best efforts". _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
